Don Lemon: Five suggestions for black people. Skip to 1:54
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4z8EA_4YNvw
Here are many examples of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election that, as far as I’m aware, have not been debunked.
By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)
January 4, 2024
The mainstream media continues to insist that there is “no evidence” of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election.
They are lying.
Here are many examples of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election that, as far as I’m aware, have not been debunked:
Mainstream media reported that Fulton County, Georgia, “stopped” counting ballots for the night because “a water pipe has broken,” and “sent the ballot counters home.”
Video shows Republican poll watchers and media reporters leaving the building.
The same video shows a few people remain, and continue counting votes without Republican poll watchers or media reporters.
Video shows an election worker scanning the same ballots three times.
There is no visible water in these videos.
Sources:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C25DAAHZdEw
https://www.bitchute.com/video/MkqNtENpjyii/
https://twitter.com/abcpolitics/status/1323846118208376834
https://www.bitchute.com/video/rPqQKvuFk473/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/v3qUNQRKJyH5/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/fv1BUbsk1mSW/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6Bvf8xq1CsoJ/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiREC3Zy20E
To me, this is what it means to be a libertarian
https://twitter.com/DanielAlmanPGH/status/1740615275182264577
Newsom chooses Maryland resident to represent California
California governor names Laphonza Butler, former Kamala Harris adviser, to Feinstein Senate seat
By Michael R. Blood
October 2, 2023
LOS ANGELES (AP) — California Gov. Gavin Newsom has selected Laphonza Butler, a Democratic strategist and adviser to Kamala Harris’ 2020 presidential campaign, to fill the U.S. Senate seat made vacant by the death of Sen. Dianne Feinstein.
Butler currently lives in Maryland, according to her Emily’s List biography. Izzy Gardon, a spokesman for Newsom, said Butler owns a home in California. She is expected to reregister to vote in California before being sworn in. That could happen as early as Tuesday evening when the Senate returns to session.
Is there any video or photographic evidence that John Fetterman is not brain dead?
By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)
March 4, 2023
Is there any video or photographic evidence that John Fetterman is not brain dead?
Bill Maher: Woke and Liberal are the OPPOSITE of each other
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hx_8AeiUDlU
Political Compass
Political Compass:
https://www.politicalcompass.org/test
Here are my results:
Economic Left/Right: 0.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.51
Californians Move to Texas – Episodes 1 and 2
Episode 1:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlDWzN6TW5Y
Episode 2:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MOy6Z_UP7c
Tesla introduces the first robot politician
Tesla robot walks, waves, but doesn’t show off complex tasks
October 1, 2022
DETROIT (AP) — An early prototype of Tesla Inc.’s proposed Optimus humanoid robot slowly and awkwardly walked onto a stage, turned, and waved to a cheering crowd at the company’s artificial intelligence event Friday.
… the robots are “missing a brain” and don’t have the intelligence to navigate themselves
Here are many examples of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election that, as far as I’m aware, have not been debunked. Last updated on April 9, 2023.
By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)
Last updated on April 9, 2023
The mainstream media continues to insist that there is “no evidence” of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election.
They are lying.
Here are many examples of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election that, as far as I’m aware, have not been debunked:
Update on April 9, 2023: This bolded part about Russell James Ramsland, Jr. has been debunked by the Washington Post. Source: https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:DIeNh6OUiiIJ:https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/interactive/2021/trump-election-fraud-texas-businessman-ramsland-asog/&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Russell James Ramsland, Jr. audited 22 Dominion voting machines that were used in Antrim County, Michigan.
This is his conclusion from his report on his audit:
“We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.”
Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, and Michigan Judge Kevin Elsenheimer all tried to prevent the public from seeing Ramsland’s report on his audit.
Why did they try to prevent the public from seeing the audit?
What were they afraid of?
Also, after the audit was ordered, but before the audit actually took place, Benson ordered the memory in the voting machines to be erased.
Why did Benson order the memory in the machines to be erased before the audit?
What was she afraid of?
Sources:
https://g1nbc.com/howell-mi/files/2020/12/Recount-Release-of-Security-Memo-Nov-2020-General.pdf
https://www.bitchute.com/video/RMJ7vx1tyFls/
Mainstream media reported that Fulton County, Georgia, “stopped” counting ballots for the night because “a water pipe has broken,” and “sent the ballot counters home.”
Video shows Republican poll watchers and media reporters leaving the building.
The same video shows a few people remain, and continue counting votes without Republican poll watchers or media reporters.
Video shows an election worker scanning the same ballots three times.
There is no visible water in these videos.
Sources:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C25DAAHZdEw
https://www.bitchute.com/video/MkqNtENpjyii/
https://twitter.com/abcpolitics/status/1323846118208376834
https://www.bitchute.com/video/rPqQKvuFk473/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/v3qUNQRKJyH5/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/fv1BUbsk1mSW/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6Bvf8xq1CsoJ/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiREC3Zy20E
CORRECTION: Fact check: Deviation from Benford’s Law does not prove election fraud
Link to my original post: https://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/2020/11/07/joe-bidens-votes-violate-benfords-law-mathematics/
And here’s the correction, which I have also added to my original post:
Fact check: Deviation from Benford’s Law does not prove election fraud
By Reuters Staff
Social media users have been sharing posts that say a mathematical rule called Benford’s Law provides clear proof of fraud in the U.S. presidential election. However, research papers and academics consulted by Reuters consistently say that deviation from Benford’s Law does not prove election fraud took place.
Benford’s law says that in many naturally occurring sets of numbers, the first digits of these numbers (eg. the ‘1’ in ‘15’) are not evenly distributed. Measurements with a lower first digit occur more frequently: 1 is the first digit in a number about 30 percent of the time while 9 begins less than 5 percent of numbers. In certain data sets ranging from rainfall amounts to town populations, the numbers follow a Benford’s Law distribution. Deviation of data from Benford’s law has been examined in areas such as finance to detect if something is not right, for example fraud, mistakes or misstatements (here , here) .
The posts, such as those here and here , show graphs that compare candidate’s vote tallies by leading digit to the expected distribution according to Benford’s law in order to contend that Biden’s vote tallies do not follow Benford’s Law but Trump’s do. Posts state that Benford’s law is a test that has been used before to detect fraud (here) . Captions on the posts include, “Joe Biden’s votes violate Benford’s Law”; “It’s easy to win if you cheat”; “Statistically impossible odds […] now MATH doesn’t even agree with their faux victory.”
Reuters sought comment from experts regarding these claims.
Theodore P. Hill, Professor Emeritus of Mathematics at Georgia Tech, Atlanta, cautioned that regardless of the distribution uncovered, the application of Benford’s Law would not provide definitive evidence that fraud took place.
“First, I’d like to stress that Benford’s Law can NOT be used to “prove fraud”,” he told Reuters by email. “It is only a Red Flag test, that can raise doubts. E.g., the IRS has been using it for decades to ferret out fraudsters, but only by identifying suspicious entries, at which time they put the auditors to work on the hard evidence. Whether or not a dataset follows BL proves nothing.”
Walter Mebane, Professor at the Department of Political Science and Department of Statistics at the University of Michigan (here) authored a December 2006 article (here) around the application of Benford’s Law to the US presidential election results. The article suggested some limitations of the process, but said in the Abstract: “The test is worth taking seriously as a statistical test for election fraud.”
Nevertheless, Mebane’s article also said, in the Discussion: “In any case, the 2BL test on its own should not be considered proof either that election fraud has occurred or that an election was clean. A significant 2BL test result can be caused by complications other than fraud. Some kinds of fraud the 2BL test cannot detect.”
On Nov. 9, 2020, in response to “several queries” Mebane published a paper called “Inappropriate Applications of Benford’s Law Regularities to Some Data from the 2020 Presidential Election in the United States” (here). His paper says, “The displays shown at those sources using the first digits of precinct vote counts data from Fulton County, GA, Allegheny County, PA, Milwaukee, WI, and Chicago, IL, say nothing about possible frauds” before examining the reasons behind this statement.
“It is widely understood that the first digits of precinct vote counts are not useful for trying to diagnose election frauds,” he writes.
Elsewhere, a study called “Benford’s Law and the Detection of Election Fraud”, published in 2011 by Joseph Deckert, Mikhail Myagkov, Professor of Political Science at the University of Oregon (here) and Peter Ordeshook, Professor of Political Science at Caltech (here), found that Benford’s Law was “problematical at best” when applied to elections: “We find that conformity with and deviations from Benford’s Law follow no pattern. […] Its “success rate” either way is essentially equivalent to a toss of a coin, thereby rendering it problematical at best as a forensic tool and wholly misleading at worst.” (here)
Dr Jen Golbeck, Professor of the College of Information Studies at the University of Maryland (www.cs.umd.edu/~golbeck/), said in a thread on Twitter (here) that the claims in the social media posts are false, citing the above article. She told Reuters, “There is just not solid evidence that Benford works in elections at all. The results are profoundly mixed. Which means it’s not evidence of anything.”
Golbeck points out that the numbers on some graphs being cited by social media users are not even labelled, whilst the law “works on very specific types of numbers”. She added that none of the research that analyzes the Benford Law is as simplistic as the analysis people are posting: instead, research uses “quite advanced statistical techniques”, often looking at the second digits which have their own expected distribution.
The specific case of the Milwaukee results was also examined by Professor Boud Roukema of Poland’s Nicolaus Copernicus University. Roukema considered the application of Benford’s Law to the 2009 Iranian elections (arxiv.org/abs/0906.2789) . He told Reuters by email: “A major flaw in applying Benford’s law to the Milwaukee results is that the logarithmic distribution – how many “powers of tens” there are – in the numbers of votes per ward in Milwaukee is very narrow. In other words, half of all the wards have total votes from about 570 to 1200, and the logarithmic average (mean) is about 800.
“Biden overall got about 70% of the votes in Milwaukee. So the most likely vote for Biden (in the simplest model, assuming no falsification) in a typical Milwaukee ward is something like 0.7 times 800, which is 560 votes. We expect about half the Biden votes to lie between about 400 and 850 in typical Milwaukee wards.
“So the most popular first digit of the votes for Biden should be 5 – the first digit of 560 – and 4s and 6s and 7s should also be reasonably frequent.
“This is just what we see in the blue vertical bars in top left figure in the diagram at (here). So Benford’s law reasoning, applied to the real data, shows no reason to suspect fraud here.”
The academic and digital research coalition Election Integrity Partnership also cautioned against the conclusion that deviation from Benford’s Law is evidence of election fraud (here). It pointed out that for the law to hold, all numbers must be equally likely to appear and the numbers must span multiple orders of magnitude (eg. Range from 100 to 10,000,000). They say that one of these conditions is not met in the election: “For vote tallies, all numbers are equally likely, but not all states meet the second assumption. In the state of Nevada, Esmeralda County has around 900 people while Clark County has over 2,250,000 people. In the state of Vermont, the bounds are much narrower.”
VERDICT
False. The degree to which Benford’s Law can be used as an indicator of electoral fraud has been debated by academics, but the application of the rule to the leading digit of local vote tallies is problematic and apparent deviation from the law cannot be used alone to prove electoral fraud, experts say.
This article was produced by the Reuters Fact Check team. Read more about our fact-checking work here.
This guy tried to start a new business in San Francisco, but government bureaucracy forced him to abandon his plans after he had already spent $200,000
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ice-cream-owner-tried-failed-110001498.html
The ice cream owner who tried, failed – and now owes $200,000
By Gene Marks
May 30, 2021
He tried, and he failed. But the worst part is he never got a chance to even start. And now he’s got a $200,000 debt to pay off.
That’s the story of Jason Yu, a 30-year-old father of two who had the audacity to attempt to open up an ice cream shop in San Francisco’s Mission District. Unfortunately, the city got in his way.
As reported by San Francisco Chronicle, Yu started his project – a shop that sold green-tea-flavored ice cream – in late 2018, and ultimately found a location in mid-2019 where he got to work. After committing to a lease ($7,300 a month – this is San Francisco, remember?) he hired an architect to draw up plans for the space, which proposed no structural changes or modifications.
Then the city stepped in.
After submitting plans to the department of building and inspection in November 2019, which required him to notify his neighbors, one of said neighbors – a competing ice cream shop no less – contested the idea and Yu was forced to wait until the following June before he could plead his case in front the city’s planning commission (more legal fees), who ultimately gave him the go-ahead.
So we’re ready to open, right? Wrong.
As the Chronicle explains: “Yu won approval, but then got stuck in the city’s never-ending web of securing permits. The Department of Building Inspection’s online permit tracker shows Yu faced 15 hurdles to secure his permits including getting the sign-off from a host of departments. The last to weigh in was the Department of Public Health, which said in December its review was complete, but that Yu owed more money in permit fees before the department could give the OK.”
Yu had spent a boatload – about $200,000 – by this point and still had nothing to show for it. It was then that he decided to cut his losses and abandon the idea. “This [the ice cream shop] became a nightmare project,” Yu said.
The problem facing small business owners like Yu is that, in San Francisco, existing businesses and residents are allowed to contest the establishment of new businesses or construction projects in their neighborhoods. Many – not surprisingly – have pushed these rights to their extreme because there’s little downside to filing even frivolous claims. So, as Mike Chen reports in The Frisc, an existing falafel shop can tie up a would-be competitor for months or neighbors can reject each other’s remodeling plans for the smallest of reasons.
“While community and neighborhood input is often positive, what we have here is overkill,” Chen writes. “The labyrinthine permitting and ‘Discretionary Review’ process (where appeals courts can decide what cases to hear) contribute to commercial storefront vacancies and to our housing crisis.” Chen says he had observed regulatory processes like discretionary reviews and environmental appeals “for years”.
The good news is that San Francisco’s political leaders seem to be waking up to the fact that over-regulation is killing commerce.
Yu’s story, which went viral last month (and spurred an online campaign against the competing ice cream shop owner) has drawn national attention to San Francisco’s burdensome process for starting up a small business. In late 2020, the city passed legislation – called Prop H – to help streamline the process for starting a new business but there have been few takers so far. According to Knight, as of the end of last month only 50 people have expressed interest and only two new businesses have been approved.
Thanks to Covid – and a good broadband connection – many workers and entrepreneurs are already moving out of big towns and enjoying the quality of life found in more peaceful surroundings where costs are lower and safe streets are a given. For cities like San Francisco to counter this growing trend, rules have to be relaxed and more businesses should be allowed to move quickly and easily open. Forcing a would-be owner of an ice cream shop of all things to spend $200,000 and then abandon the venture because of red tape is not a recipe for future economic growth.
Here are many examples of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election that, as far as I’m aware, have not been debunked. Updated for May 11, 2021.
By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)
May 11, 2021
The mainstream media continues to insist that there is “no evidence” of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election.
They are lying.
Here are many examples of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election that, as far as I’m aware, have not been debunked:
Russell James Ramsland, Jr. audited 22 Dominion voting machines that were used in Antrim County, Michigan.
This is his conclusion from his report on his audit:
“We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.”
Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, and Michigan Judge Kevin Elsenheimer all tried to prevent the public from seeing Ramsland’s report on his audit.
Why did they try to prevent the public from seeing the audit?
What were they afraid of?
Also, after the audit was ordered, but before the audit actually took place, Benson ordered the memory in the voting machines to be erased.
Why did Benson order the memory in the machines to be erased before the audit?
What was she afraid of?
Sources:
https://g1nbc.com/howell-mi/files/2020/12/Recount-Release-of-Security-Memo-Nov-2020-General.pdf
https://www.bitchute.com/video/RMJ7vx1tyFls/
Mainstream media reported that Fulton County, Georgia, “stopped” counting ballots for the night because “a water pipe has broken,” and “sent the ballot counters home.”
Video shows Republican poll watchers and media reporters leaving the building.
The same video shows a few people remain, and continue counting votes without Republican poll watchers or media reporters.
Video shows an election worker scanning the same ballots three times.
There is no visible water in these videos.
Sources:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C25DAAHZdEw
https://www.bitchute.com/video/MkqNtENpjyii/
https://twitter.com/abcpolitics/status/1323846118208376834
https://www.bitchute.com/video/rPqQKvuFk473/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/v3qUNQRKJyH5/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keANzinHWUA
https://www.bitchute.com/video/fv1BUbsk1mSW/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6Bvf8xq1CsoJ/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiREC3Zy20E
America Should Focus on Exceptionalism Not Imperfections
America Should Focus on Exceptionalism Not Imperfections
By Michael Busler
May 9, 2021
Starting about 15 years ago a trend began that convinced Americans to focus on this country’s imperfections rather than its exceptionalism. This now rapidly growing trend has resulted in long-term economic stagnation and a deeply divided country.
America’s astonishing growth and well spread generosity has resulted in the world’s most prosperous country. It has also resulted in keeping much of the world safe from unwanted oppression, mostly by leading the victories in World War I and World War II. America fought other wars around the globe that protected our security interests but mostly help preserve freedom in other countries.
America was however, not perfect. Slavery and racism had been common practices in virtually every country in the world since the beginning of recorded history. Tragically, and what today seems like obvious ignorance, people just accepted that as normal.
About 90 years after our country was founded, we realized the unjust treatment of human beings was not consistent with the principles that America followed. Slavery was abolished. Deep seeded racism would, however, take a lot longer.
About 100 years after slavery was abolished, America made civil rights the law of the land, so that all people, regardless of skin color, had to be treated equally. Finally America had corrected its system to reflect its values. Racism within individuals could not be fixed quite as quickly.
Sometimes there are people whose ignorant and negative beliefs span generations. Often when these people have not had success in life or have faced tragedy, they look to blame others.
Their prejudice makes it easy for them to blame people of color.
Sometimes it’s the circumstances and the behavior of the minority groups that contributes to the racism. Since many have not been afforded adequate education and economic opportunities, they tend to have lower average income levels and higher than average crime rates. That fuels the racists.
In spite of those and other imperfections, miraculous advancements have been made in every area that improves the quality of life and our standard of living.
In healthcare, we have eliminated major diseases, fought pandemics in record time and vastly extended the life expectancy. The quality of life has vastly improved since we cure or at least treat almost all major health issues. We even use robotic surgery to quickly and accurately replace knees and hips.
Americans loved to be entertained and are willing to pay handsomely. As such the free market economy has been able to satisfy all of those needs. Large-screen, easy to use televisions are in everyone’s homes. The choice of what to watch is endless. Cable companies now offer hundreds of channels. At least a dozen streaming services allow us to watch what we want, when we want.
America loves sports. Those needs were also satisfied by our free market economy. There are now professional sports leagues with more than 30 teams for baseball, football and basketball. Soccer continues to grow in the US. Add in the tv broadcasting of college football and basketball, golf, tennis, car racing and the Olympics and there something for everyone.
Then there’s technology which has revolutionized our lives. The personal computer hit the market in the early 1980’s. That led to the creation of the internet in the 1990’s. Then came cell phones and tablets which morphed into small computers with wide-ranging communication devices and a high tech camera. This technology has vastly improved the quality of life for the entire population.
We should focus on our achievements instead of focusing on our imperfections. Although we should recognize those imperfections and move to fix them without destroying anything.
Instead we vilify those who we should be thanking. Businesspeople who were able to provide the most satisfying goods and services, became very wealthy. Most are now millionaires and a few are billionaires.
We should be thankful to them for satisfying the needs of consumers and providing opportunity for workers. That’s the way a free market system works: exceptional but not perfect. It provides a fair distribution of income based on an individual’s contribution. Because contributions vary widely, we have an unequal distribution of income.
Focusing on the imperfections will continue to stagnate long term economic growth and further divide the country. Our system is not racist. Barak Obama and Kamala Harris would not have been elected if we have a racist system. There are racist people who need to be better educated.
In the meantime let’s focus on the three-quarter full part of the glass rather than the one-quarter empty.
I think the COVID-19 lockdown is killing more people than it is saving. Here are my many reasons for thinking such a thing. Updated for March 26, 2021.
By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)
March 26, 2021
I think the COVIOD-19 lockdown is killing more people than it is saving.
I’m going to start out by posting the CDC’s estimated survival rates, by age, for people who contract COVID-19:
Here are many examples of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election that, as far as I’m aware, have not been debunked. Updated for March 10, 2021.
Note: A more recent version of this list can be found at https://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/2021/05/11/stop-the-steal-5/
By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)
March 10, 2021
The mainstream media continues to insist that there is “no evidence” of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election.
They are lying.
Here are many examples of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election that, as far as I’m aware, have not been debunked:
Russell James Ramsland, Jr. audited 22 Dominion voting machines that were used in Antrim County, Michigan.
This is his conclusion from his report on his audit:
“We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.”
Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, and Michigan Judge Kevin Elsenheimer all tried to prevent the public from seeing Ramsland’s report on his audit.
Why did they try to prevent the public from seeing the audit?
What were they afraid of?
Also, after the audit was ordered, but before the audit actually took place, Benson ordered the memory in the voting machines to be erased.
Why did Benson order the memory in the machines to be erased before the audit?
What was she afraid of?
Sources:
https://g1nbc.com/howell-mi/files/2020/12/Recount-Release-of-Security-Memo-Nov-2020-General.pdf
Mainstream media reported that Fulton County, Georgia, “stopped” counting ballots for the night because “a water pipe has broken,” and “sent the ballot counters home.”
Video shows Republican poll watchers and media reporters leaving the building.
The same video shows a few people remain, and continue counting votes without Republican poll watchers or media reporters.
Video shows an election worker scanning the same ballots three times.
There is no visible water leak in these videos.
Sources:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C25DAAHZdEw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C25DAAHZdEw
https://twitter.com/abcpolitics/status/1323846118208376834
https://www.bitchute.com/video/v3qUNQRKJyH5/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keANzinHWUA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keANzinHWUA
https://www.bitchute.com/video/fv1BUbsk1mSW/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiREC3Zy20E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiREC3Zy20E
A study of more than 3,000 U.S. counties shows that, all else being equal, counties that used Dominion voting machines gave Biden an extra 5.6% of the vote, compared to counties that did not use Dominion machines. Since all other factors were taken into account, this is almost certain proof that Democrats cheated.
Sources:
YouTube banned a C-SPAN video of Trump’s lawyer’s opening statement on voter fraud from the Senate Committee Hearing.
Fortunately, BitChute has the video.
Why would YouTube ban a C-SPAN video?
What are they afraid of?
Sources:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/eLYThvcgZ6ef/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/eLYThvcgZ6ef/
Maricopa County, Arizona rejects subpoena to audit voting machines.
What are they afraid of?
Skip to 0:48
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6CZA44KrBQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6CZA44KrBQ
Arizona’s Maricopa board of supervisors is playing games – Trying to block a legitimate forensic audit of 2020 election ballots – Why?
Why are Arizona’s Maricopa County board of supervisors not in jail? They are reportedly breaking the law by not handing over 2020 election ballots.
Pennsylvania accepted mail in ballots for 69 hours later than what is allowed by law.
Article 1, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution says:
“The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof”
Pennsylvania law says:
“NO ABSENTEE BALLOT UNDER THIS SUBSECTION SHALL BE COUNTED WHICH IS RECEIVED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS LATER THAN [EIGHT O’CLOCK P.M. ON THE DAY OF THE PRIMARY OR ELECTION]”
NPR said:
“Pennsylvania Supreme Court Extends Vote By Mail Deadline” “Mail ballots will now be accepted if they are received by 5 p.m. on the Friday after the election and were either postmarked by Nov. 3 or there is no evidence to suggest they were sent after Election Day. Previously, mail ballots had to be received by 8 p.m. on Election Day.”
In several states, vote counting was paused late at night.
Later, when counting resumed, there were giant vote spikes with impossibly high percentages for Biden.
These things only happened in the states where Democrats needed to flip the state from Trump to Biden.
They did not happen in other states.
Source: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1329543841217540096.html
DeKalb County, Georgia illegally refused to honor an Open Records Request to show the documents for the chain of custody for the absentee ballots that were submitted in drop boxes.
What are they afraid of?
An audit of 1,400 mail-in ballots in Nevada found that 2% were cast by voters who never actually received a ballot in the mail, and 1% were cast by voters who say they didn’t even vote.
In Michigan, Federal Judge Linda Parker rejected an election lawsuit filed by Matt Braynard.
This video shows some of the claims that Braynard would have made if Judge Parker had allowed the lawsuit to proceed.
Braynard claims that his team spoke with 926 people whose names and address had been used to cast absentee ballots.
He claims that 12.6% of those people said they never requested an absentee ballot.
He plays audio from some of those people.
Why is Judge Parker afraid to let the public hear their testimony?
Sources:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8ukz9SDIdk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8ukz9SDIdk
Page 79 of this lawsuit from Georgia says
“all 900 military ballots in Fulton County that supposedly were 100% for Joe Biden”
What a computer expert said about voting results in Michigan.
Sources:
Tens of thousands of ballots arrived before their sent date in Pennsylvania.
Source: https://www.theepochtimes.com/pennsylvania-100000-ballots-with-implausible-return-dates_3572942.html
In Antrim County, Michigan, human actions and/or computer software gave thousands of Trump votes to Biden.
Wisconsin illegally refused to remove 234,000 names from the voting rolls even though they had moved out of the state or to a different city within the state.
All of these people had ignored a written notification that had been mailed to their old address.
Wisconsin made it very easy for all of these 234,000 names to be used for fraudulent voting, because the state allowed every single person in the state to declare themself as “indefinitely confined,” which allowed them to vote by absentee ballot, which allowed them to ignore the state’s voter ID law.
In 2019, only 72,000 voters in the state were “indefinitely confined.”
In 2020, this number more than tripled.
The state illegally kept the Green Party candidate off the ballot.
The city of Madison placed illegal drop boxes in the city’s 206 parks.
These illegal drop boxes were not supervised.
City employees “helped” voters to fill out their ballots before placing them into these illegal drop boxes.
The city of Milwaukee withheld reporting its vote totals until after it knew how many votes Biden would need to win.
Dominion took over Georgia voting machines remotely during 2020 election.
This is what Democrats mean when they say they are in favor of “ballot harvesting.”
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4n_5V62LT-Q
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4n_5V62LT-Q
You would think elections officials would want an investigation because it would exonerate them.
But they don’t.
What are they hiding?
Source: https://amgreatness.com/2020/12/26/mccarthy-misses-the-point-in-the-michigan-election-audit/
In Pennsylvania, a certified public accountant is claiming that the number of ballots is 202,377 bigger than the number of people who actually voted.
For five states to stop counting on election night is absolutely unprecedented.
In these videos, Jovan Hutton Pulitzer – an inventor and forensics expert – explained how he will look for fraud on paper ballots.
Georgia Senate voted to let Pulitzer examine Fulton County’s absentee ballots.
But hours later, trucks showed up and employees took the ballots into hiding to prevent them from being examined.
It was later discovered that the ballots weren’t just put into hiding. They were actually put through shredders. And not just regular shredders. They used military grade shredders, which makes it impossible to reconstruct them.
Why did they destroy the ballots before they could be examined?
What are they afraid of?
Sources:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgeqGmvQXKs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgeqGmvQXKs
https://rumble.com/vcnila-jovan-pulitzer-georgia-senate-ballot-fraud-detection.html
https://rumble.com/vcb3yh-jovan-pulitzer-georgia-fraud-hearing.html
A study by John Lott concluded:
“The precinct level estimates for Georgia and Pennsylvania indicate that vote fraud may account for Biden’s win in both states. The voter turnout rate data also indicates that there are significant excess votes in Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, and Wisconsin as well. While the problems shown here are large, there are two reasons to believe that they are underestimates: 1) the estimates using precinct level data assume that there is no fraud occurring with in-person voting and 2) the voter turnout estimates do not account for ballots for the opposing candidate that are lost, destroyed, or replaced with ballots filled out for the other candidate.”
Dominion voting machine hacked live during Georgia election hearing.
But they’re not supposed to be connected to the internet.
Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/fwFdW4fuzJvV/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/fwFdW4fuzJvV/
In Fulton County, Georgia, ballots in Republican-heavy areas, but not Democrat-heavy areas, were deliberately printed to create errors, in order to send them to be “fixed” by election workers.
Georgia Witness: “93% of military ballots for Biden.”
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9Gi7af-Gz8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9Gi7af-Gz8
Georgia County Official: Raffensperger sent armed Secretary of State agents with handcuffs to the county after they complained about the inaccurate Dominion machines.
Dominion Voting Machines CEO John Poulos said their machines “are not connected to the internet.”
But Dominion’s own training manual says they are connected to the internet.
Why did Poulos lie about this?
Source: https://youtu.be/7R1eWkPZPUY
Election supervisor shows how easy it is for election workers to change votes to whatever they want.
The official term for this form of cheating is “adjudication.”
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAHBAoy4Pis
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAHBAoy4Pis
Dominion employee Eric Coomer shows how election workers can change the votes on ballots.
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtB3tLaXLJE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtB3tLaXLJE
Video from Fulton County, Georgia, shows an election worker scanning the same ballots five times.
Sources:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sk7MgCQanaM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sk7MgCQanaM
https://www.bitchute.com/video/NttWvjegsPhF/
https://www.independentsentinel.com/same-batch-of-ballots-scanned-five-times-in-fulton-county/
Data scientists: Georgia data reveals 30,000+ Trump votes removed, another 12,173 switched to Biden
Sources:
https://rumble.com/vcfgpt-georgia-data-reveals-30000-trump-votes-removed.html
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8hcYJPl2Mavq/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejaq6IWrtPU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejaq6IWrtPU
Richard Barron is the Elections Director in Fulton County, Georgia.
In this video, he says:
“So far we’ve scanned 113,130 ballots. We’ve adjudicated over 106,000.”
Sources: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksR1fivmxSg
https://www.bitchute.com/video/AKcR5XsgqXIo/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksR1fivmxSg
The Navarro Report.
The Navarro Report: Volume Two.
The Navarro Report: Volume Three.
Report from William T. Ligon.
Source: http://www.senatorligon.com/THE_FINAL%20REPORT.PDF
https://web.archive.org/web/20201221050203/http://www.senatorligon.com/THE_FINAL%20REPORT.PDF
Dominion admits that their voting machines are connected to the internet.
Sources: https://twitter.com/JovanHPulitzer/status/1345830256234651653
https://twitter.com/JovanHPulitzer/status/1345830256234651653
Still no chain of custody documents produced in Georgia for 76% of absentee ballots cast in drop boxes two months ago in Presidential election.
More than 400,000 votes were removed from Trump in Pennsylvania, data scientists say.
Sources:
One day after someone allegedly attempted to shoot a member of his team, Jovan Pulitzer announced that evidence was found and confirmed of mail-in ballots with the votes already filled in by machine.
Sources:
https://stream.org/democrats-prefer-intimidation-rather-than-validation-of-the-election-results/
A study shows that every single time they found a bunch of votes in the middle of the night, it was always in Biden’s favor.
Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/489695105/Vote-Dumps-Report
Democrats were only able to “win” in 2020 by breaking chain of custody laws in every swing state.
The TCF Center election fraud – Newly discovered video shows late night deliveries of tens of thousands of illegal ballots 8 hours after deadline.
Sources:
Five videos – Five states where votes were switched live on TV away from President Trump to Biden.
Sources:
Article on all five states: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/four-videos-four-states-votes-switched-live-tv-away-president-trump-biden/
Video from Pennsylvania: https://rumble.com/vbf6oj-video-evidence-of-voter-software-fraud-pennsylvania-pa.html
Video from Georgia: https://rumble.com/vbgf67-video-evidence-of-voter-software-fraud-georgia-ga.html
Video from Virginia: https://rumble.com/vbf56n-video-evidence-of-voter-software-fraud-virginia-va.html
Video from Wisconsin: https://rumble.com/vbf7m5-video-evidence-of-voter-software-fraud-wisconsin-wi.html
Video from Florida: https://twitter.com/thedeziner/status/1325932850278002689
Dominion owned machines removed 6% of the votes from each of 4 Windham, New Hampshire GOP candidates.
Sources:
https://patch.com/new-hampshire/windham/investigators-eye-voting-devices-cards-after-windham-recount
https://www.nhpr.org/post/ag-asked-investigate-differing-vote-totals-contested-windham-race
Three 300,000 Biden vote dumps late on election night in Virginia cannot be adequately explained or tied to final results.
Sources:
Captured in real time: That moment in Virginia at 5:12 AM where they took 373,000 votes off the state totals
Another “glitch” – Trump loses 32,615 votes in Pennsylvania in one hour in AP totals
More “glitches” in Pennsylvania: Votes for Trump drop in three different counties simultaneously – almost as if it was coordinated
Another ‘computer glitch’ identified and corrected in Oakland County, Michigan, led to Republican winning his race
System ‘glitch’ also uncovered in Wisconsin – Reversal of swapped votes removes lead from Joe Biden
Data expert claims his team has identified enough fraudulent ballots in Georgia, Arizona, and Wisconsin to overthrow the election
San Antonio woman in Project Veritas video arrested on election-related charges.
Sources:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7jH6GaqAU0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7jH6GaqAU0
Four months after 2020 Presidential election in Georgia, no chain of custody documents produced for 404,000 absentee ballots deposited in drop boxes; Fulton County one of 35 scofflaw counties.
Sources:
I’m Jewish. I don’t feel “denigrated” by Gina Carano’s recent statement. Shame on Disney/Lucasfilm for firing her!
By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)
February 11, 2021
Gina Carano, actress on the TV series The Mandalorian, recently posted the following on TikTok:
“Jews were beaten in the streets, not by Nazi soldiers but by their neighbors… even by children.”
“Because history is edited, most people today don’t realize that to get to the point where Nazi soldiers could easily round up thousands of Jews, the government first made their own neighbors hate them simply for being Jews. How is that any different from hating someone for their political views?”
Her employer, Disney/Lucasfilm, responded with the following:
“Gina Carano is not currently employed by Lucasfilm and there are no plans for her to be in the future. Nevertheless, her social media posts denigrating people based on their cultural and religious identities are abhorrent and unacceptable.”
I’m Jewish.
I don’t feel “denigrated” by Carano’s statment.
I actually agree with what she said.
And even if I didn’t agree with what she said, I still support free speech for everyone.
I’ve seen every episode of The Mandalorian.
I think it was wrong for Disney/Lucasfilm to fire Carano.
This wonderful TV series can only be harmed by her firing.
Shame on Disney/Lucasfilm for firing her!
Does Ashli Babbitt’s blood pattern look real or fake? For a fatal neck shot, why is there so little blood, and no spraying or spattering? Skip to 14:19 in this video to see for yourself.
Usually, when a police officer shoots and kills an unarmed person, the name of the police officer is reported by the media, the result of the autopsy is reported by the media, and the date and location of the funeral are reported by the media.
But with Ashli Babbitt, none of those three things have been reported in this case, even though it’s been more than a month since she was killed.
Why is that?
I just watched this entire 21 minute analysis of the shooting. The guy makes a good case that the entire thing was staged.
I’m not saying he’s right. I’m not saying he’s wrong.
If he is right, it would explain why there haven’t been any news reports about the name of the shooter, the autopsy, or the funeral.
Does Ashli Babbitt’s blood pattern look real or fake?
For a fatal neck shot, why is there so little blood, and no spraying or spattering?
Skip to 14:19 in this video to see for yourself.
Everything Wrong With the Capitol Shooting In 21 Minutes Or Less [Banned by YouTube, this video tries to prove that Ashli Babbitt’s shooting was fake]
Usually, when a police officer shoots and kills an unarmed person, the name of the police officer is reported by the media, the result of the autopsy is reported by the media, and the date and location of the funeral are reported by the media.
But with Ashli Babbitt, none of those three things have been reported in this case, even though it’s been more than a month since she was killed.
Why is that?
I just watched this entire 21 minute analysis of the shooting. The guy makes a good case that the entire thing was staged.
I’m not saying he’s right. I’m not saying he’s wrong.
If he is right, it would explain why there haven’t been any news reports about the name of the shooter, the autopsy, or the funeral.
Nancy Pelosi violated her own metal detector rule
Republicans Demand Pelosi Be Fined $5,000 for Skirting Her Own Metal Detector Rule
By Ivan Pentchoukov
February 5, 2021
Republicans from the Committee on House Administration on Friday requested that the House Sergeant at Arms impose a fine on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) for breaking her own rule by allegedly bypassing a metal detector on her way into the House chamber.
“Yesterday, at approximately 9:59 a.m., multiple members observed the Speaker of the House entering the House chamber without completing a security screening,” Republican Reps. Rodney Davis (Ill.), Barry Loudermilk (Ga.) and Bryan Steil (Wisc.) wrote in a letter to Acting House Sergeant at Arms Timothy Blodgett.
“What was observed was a clear violation of House Resolution 73 and you are required by House Rules to impose this fine. Please inform us once the fine has been assessed.”
Pelosi’s office did not respond to a request for comment. The speaker put the rule in place specifically targeting a handful of Republicans who have spoken about legally carrying firearms on the House floor. The fine for the first offense is $5,000.
The Office of the Sergeant at Arms didn’t respond to a request for comment. Blodgett told The Hill that he has not received a complaint about the matter from the Capitol Police.
“House Sergeant at Arms imposes the fine after receiving an unusual occurrence report from the United States Capitol Police (USCP). An unusual incident report from the Capitol Police is appended to the document sent to the Member providing notice of the fine,” Blodgett wrote to The Hill.
“Only the USCP can determine whether an individual has failed to complete security screening as only the USCP has sufficient training to determine compliance with USCP screening procedures. I have directed that the USCP produce and provide unusual incident reports on any individual who fails to complete security screening without exception. I have not received any unusual incident report from the USCP concerning the Speaker of the House.”
The text of the resolution does not require a report from the USCP for a fine to be imposed but does authorize the sergeant at arms to establish policies and procedures to implement the resolution.
Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas), who was himself fined $5,000 for violating the resolution, wrote on Twitter, “Why isn’t the Speaker of the House being fined for skirting the metal detector?”
“Speaker Pelosi made the rules. She must live by her rules like everyone else,” Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) wrote on Twitter.
Video: When conservative Ami Horowitz visited Yale University to conduct his latest experiment, 65% of the people that he spoke with signed his petition to get rid of the U.S. Constitution
Conservative Ami Horowitz has a regular habit of visiting different colleges to see what percentage of the people that he talks with will sign his ridiculous petitions. You can see his many different experiments at his YouTube channel at this link: https://www.youtube.com/user/amihorowitz/videos
In Horowitz’s latest experiment, he visited Yale University. 65% of the people that he talked with signed his petition to get rid of the U.S. Constitution.
In my opinion, this proves that this Ivy League University gives students a dumbed down education which supports totalitarianism.
According to mainstream news sources, at least two of the people arrested at the Capitol riot are left wing activists
By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)
January 14, 2021
Associated Press reported:
NYC man arrested on Capitol riot charges freed on $100K bond
January 12, 2021
NEW YORK (AP) — The son of a New York City judge who was arrested by the FBI on charges that he was among the protesters who stormed the U.S. Capitol was ordered Tuesday by a different judge to stay away from Washington.
Aaron Mostofsky, 34, was picked up at his brother’s home in Brooklyn on Tuesday morning, about a week after he was seen inside the Capitol wearing a fur costume and a police vest he is accused of stealing during the mayhem.
The charges include a felony count of theft of government property — a bulletproof police vest worth $1,905 and a riot shield valued at $265.
Records show Aaron Mostofsky is a registered Democrat.
KTVX, the ABC television affiliate in Salt Lake City, Utah, reported:
Utah activist who provided video of deadly D.C. riot to investigators arrested
January 14, 2021
SALT LAKE CITY (ABC4) – A Utah activist is facing charges for his alleged involvement in the deadly U.S. Capitol protest last week.
The Tooele County Sheriff’s Office tells ABC4’s Jason Nguyen that John Sullivan has been booked into their custody under a U.S. Marshall’s warrant.
According to the U.S. Department of Justice, Sullivan has been charged with entering a restricted building or grounds without authority; civil disorders; and violent entry or disorderly conduct.
The criminal complaint filed against Sullivan lists him as the “leader of an organization called Insurgence USA through which he organizes protests.”
He was arrested in June in connection to riots in Provo and charged with 3rd-degree felony riot and criminal mischief. In July, officials say Sullivan was charged with rioting and criminal mischief for the Provo riots.
Federal investigators say they obtained a video posted on YouTube of Sullivan allegedly seen in the crowd, telling those around him over a microphone “we got to rip Trump out of office” and “we ain’t waiting until the next election.” He was also seen wearing a ballistic vest and a gas mask.
Dan from Squirrel Hill's Blog 