Prosecutors Find Mail-In Jury Votes At 3AM, Rittenhouse Now Guilty [Satire]

https://babylonbee.com/news/after-prosecutors-find-mail-in-jury-votes-at-3am-rittenhouse-now-guilty

Prosecutors Find Mail-In Jury Votes At 3AM, Rittenhouse Now Guilty

November 20, 2021

KENOSHA, WI—In a stunning reversal, Kyle Rittenhouse awoke this morning to discover that he had been found guilty after all.

Prosecutors explained that during the night, they had found dozens of mail-in jury votes declaring the defendant guilty on all counts. Apparently, boxes of these mail-in votes arrived in a truck at the courthouse around 3:00 am.

Attorneys for Mr. Rittenhouse were dumbfounded as to how such a thing could have happened, raising questions as to the validity of mail-in jury voting. They stated: “We’ve never heard of this. This isn’t part of the legal system. Where did these votes even come from?”

“How DARE you question the sanctity of our criminal justice system!” cried the prosecuting attorneys. “There is no justice until EVERY vote is counted!”

Prosecutors then explained that it was a new COVID measure they had just instituted. “But given how well it’s worked out,” they said, “we’re planning on making it permanent.”

November 20, 2021. Tags: , , , . Humor, Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Far Left Judge Marie Avery Moses Issues Protective Order on Eric Coomer’s Deposition After He Comes Across as Completely Unhinged – But Not on Defendants Including The Gateway Pundit

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/far-left-judge-marie-avery-moses-issues-protective-order-eric-coomers-deposition-comes-across-completely-unhinged-not-defendants-including-gateway-pundit/

Far Left Judge Marie Avery Moses Issues Protective Order on Eric Coomer’s Deposition After He Comes Across as Completely Unhinged – But Not on Defendants Including The Gateway Pundit

By Jim Hoft

September 30, 2021

What double standard?

The American left is out to destroy the justice system in the country today.

Attorney Sidney Powell announced during an interview last week that her legal team will depose Dominion’s Eric Coomer for questioning later in the day.

Coomer sued several Trump supporters, media outlets and media personalities following the 2020 presidential election, including Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, Michelle Malkin, Joe Oltmann, The Gateway Pundit and Jim Hoft, among others.

Eric Coomer was deposed for an hour by Powell’s attorneys last week.

From what we are hearing it was a complete disaster. The Dominion executive came across completely unhinged and angry.

That’s when far left Judge Marie Avery Moses stepped in to protect Eric Coomer.

Judge Moses issued a Protective Order that only grants secrecy to Eric Coomer’s deposition – but not anyone else’s.

According to our confidential source, “The Judge issued this order sua sponte, which means that no one asked her to do this. She just did it on her own the day after Coomer gave a train-wreck deposition in which he was very clearly emotionally unstable, arrogant, and repeatedly failed to give direct answers to questions. He was clearly playing games and his testimony is simply not credible.”

The media is now blocked from downloading his testimony.

One wonders how the Judge came to this conclusion – the day after Coomer’s deposition – that his deposition transcript needed to be sealed.

What happened to integrity, honesty and justice in America?

Here is the court order by Judge Moses.

October 1, 2021. Tags: , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. 1 comment.

CORRECTION: Fact check: Deviation from Benford’s Law does not prove election fraud

Link to my original post: https://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/2020/11/07/joe-bidens-votes-violate-benfords-law-mathematics/

And here’s the correction, which I have also added to my original post:

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-benford/fact-check-deviation-from-benfords-law-does-not-prove-election-fraud-idUSKBN27Q3AI

Fact check: Deviation from Benford’s Law does not prove election fraud

By Reuters Staff

Social media users have been sharing posts that say a mathematical rule called Benford’s Law provides clear proof of fraud in the U.S. presidential election. However, research papers and academics consulted by Reuters consistently say that deviation from Benford’s Law does not prove election fraud took place.

Benford’s law says that in many naturally occurring sets of numbers, the first digits of these numbers (eg. the ‘1’ in ‘15’) are not evenly distributed. Measurements with a lower first digit occur more frequently: 1 is the first digit in a number about 30 percent of the time while 9 begins less than 5 percent of numbers. In certain data sets ranging from rainfall amounts to town populations, the numbers follow a Benford’s Law distribution. Deviation of data from Benford’s law has been examined in areas such as finance to detect if something is not right, for example fraud, mistakes or misstatements (here , here) .

The posts, such as those here and here , show graphs that compare candidate’s vote tallies by leading digit to the expected distribution according to Benford’s law in order to contend that Biden’s vote tallies do not follow Benford’s Law but Trump’s do. Posts state that Benford’s law is a test that has been used before to detect fraud (here) . Captions on the posts include, “Joe Biden’s votes violate Benford’s Law”; “It’s easy to win if you cheat”; “Statistically impossible odds […] now MATH doesn’t even agree with their faux victory.”

Reuters sought comment from experts regarding these claims.

Theodore P. Hill, Professor Emeritus of Mathematics at Georgia Tech, Atlanta, cautioned that regardless of the distribution uncovered, the application of Benford’s Law would not provide definitive evidence that fraud took place.

“First, I’d like to stress that Benford’s Law can NOT be used to “prove fraud”,” he told Reuters by email. “It is only a Red Flag test, that can raise doubts. E.g., the IRS has been using it for decades to ferret out fraudsters, but only by identifying suspicious entries, at which time they put the auditors to work on the hard evidence. Whether or not a dataset follows BL proves nothing.”

Walter Mebane, Professor at the Department of Political Science and Department of Statistics at the University of Michigan (here) authored a December 2006 article (here) around the application of Benford’s Law to the US presidential election results. The article suggested some limitations of the process, but said in the Abstract: “The test is worth taking seriously as a statistical test for election fraud.”

Nevertheless, Mebane’s article also said, in the Discussion: “In any case, the 2BL test on its own should not be considered proof either that election fraud has occurred or that an election was clean. A significant 2BL test result can be caused by complications other than fraud. Some kinds of fraud the 2BL test cannot detect.”

On Nov. 9, 2020, in response to “several queries” Mebane published a paper called “Inappropriate Applications of Benford’s Law Regularities to Some Data from the 2020 Presidential Election in the United States” (here). His paper says, “The displays shown at those sources using the first digits of precinct vote counts data from Fulton County, GA, Allegheny County, PA, Milwaukee, WI, and Chicago, IL, say nothing about possible frauds” before examining the reasons behind this statement.

“It is widely understood that the first digits of precinct vote counts are not useful for trying to diagnose election frauds,” he writes.

Elsewhere, a study called “Benford’s Law and the Detection of Election Fraud”, published in 2011 by Joseph Deckert, Mikhail Myagkov, Professor of Political Science at the University of Oregon (here) and Peter Ordeshook, Professor of Political Science at Caltech (here), found that Benford’s Law was “problematical at best” when applied to elections: “We find that conformity with and deviations from Benford’s Law follow no pattern. […] Its “success rate” either way is essentially equivalent to a toss of a coin, thereby rendering it problematical at best as a forensic tool and wholly misleading at worst.” (here)

Dr Jen Golbeck, Professor of the College of Information Studies at the University of Maryland (www.cs.umd.edu/~golbeck/), said in a thread on Twitter (here) that the claims in the social media posts are false, citing the above article. She told Reuters, “There is just not solid evidence that Benford works in elections at all. The results are profoundly mixed. Which means it’s not evidence of anything.”

Golbeck points out that the numbers on some graphs being cited by social media users are not even labelled, whilst the law “works on very specific types of numbers”. She added that none of the research that analyzes the Benford Law is as simplistic as the analysis people are posting: instead, research uses “quite advanced statistical techniques”, often looking at the second digits which have their own expected distribution.

The specific case of the Milwaukee results was also examined by Professor Boud Roukema of Poland’s Nicolaus Copernicus University. Roukema considered the application of Benford’s Law to the 2009 Iranian elections (arxiv.org/abs/0906.2789) . He told Reuters by email: “A major flaw in applying Benford’s law to the Milwaukee results is that the logarithmic distribution – how many “powers of tens” there are – in the numbers of votes per ward in Milwaukee is very narrow. In other words, half of all the wards have total votes from about 570 to 1200, and the logarithmic average (mean) is about 800.

“Biden overall got about 70% of the votes in Milwaukee. So the most likely vote for Biden (in the simplest model, assuming no falsification) in a typical Milwaukee ward is something like 0.7 times 800, which is 560 votes. We expect about half the Biden votes to lie between about 400 and 850 in typical Milwaukee wards.

“So the most popular first digit of the votes for Biden should be 5 – the first digit of 560 – and 4s and 6s and 7s should also be reasonably frequent.

“This is just what we see in the blue vertical bars in top left figure in the diagram at (here). So Benford’s law reasoning, applied to the real data, shows no reason to suspect fraud here.”

The academic and digital research coalition Election Integrity Partnership also cautioned against the conclusion that deviation from Benford’s Law is evidence of election fraud (here). It pointed out that for the law to hold, all numbers must be equally likely to appear and the numbers must span multiple orders of magnitude (eg. Range from 100 to 10,000,000). They say that one of these conditions is not met in the election: “For vote tallies, all numbers are equally likely, but not all states meet the second assumption. In the state of Nevada, Esmeralda County has around 900 people while Clark County has over 2,250,000 people. In the state of Vermont, the bounds are much narrower.”

VERDICT

False. The degree to which Benford’s Law can be used as an indicator of electoral fraud has been debated by academics, but the application of the rule to the leading digit of local vote tallies is problematic and apparent deviation from the law cannot be used alone to prove electoral fraud, experts say.

This article was produced by the Reuters Fact Check team. Read more about our fact-checking work here.

September 4, 2021. Tags: , , , , , , , . Math, Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Investigators Have Video of 240 Leftist Operatives in Georgia Dumping Thousands of Ballots from Backpacks into Drop Boxes in Middle of the Night!

Article: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/breaking-got-caught-investigators-video-240-leftist-operatives-georgia-dumping-thousands-ballots-backpacks-drop-boxes-middle-night/

Video: https://rumble.com/vm1kkx-ga-officials-have-video-of-240-leftist-operatives-dumping-1000s-of-ballots-.html

 

September 3, 2021. Tags: , , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

In Maricopa County, Arizona, 11,326 people voted but did not register to vote until after the election

Video at https://www.bitchute.com/video/3ajWHO5V0n2V/

July 15, 2021. Tags: , , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Maricopa County, Arizona counted 74,243 mail-in ballots that have no record of being sent to voters

Video at https://www.bitchute.com/video/JoyNvFYEnu5g/

July 15, 2021. Tags: , , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Here are some early results from the audit in Maricopa County, Arizona

Election workers counted 74,000 mail-in ballots that had never actually been mailed out to anyone.

11,326 people voted in the election but did not appear on the voter rolls on November 7, but did appear on the voter rolls on December 4.

3,981 people voted even though they had not registered to vote until after the October 15 registration deadline.

18,000 people who voted were removed from the voting rolls after the election.

Sources:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/07/wow-az-audit-finds-74000-ballots-returned-counted-2020-election-no-record-sent/

https://therightscoop.com/watch-arizona-forensic-auditors-detail-the-highly-suspicious-findings-from-their-audit/

https://www.westernjournal.com/breaking-az-auditors-reveal-massively-disturbing-results-2020-election/

July 15, 2021. Tags: , , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Atlanta’s biggest newspaper and Fox News are both reporting that ballots were scanned multiple times in Fulton County, Georgia

New article from Atlanta’s biggest newspaper:

https://www.ajc.com/politics/some-ballots-initially-double-counted-in-fulton-before-recount/GY4FTEEI6REIJN3SDKIDNIOYV4/

New report from Fox News:

https://rumble.com/vjuxir-tucker-presents-meaningful-evidence-of-voter-fraud-in-georgia-election.html

Older info:

CBS News, Nov 3, 2020: “Pipe burst in Georgia delays vote counting”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C25DAAHZdEw

ABC News, November 3, 2020: “The election department sent the ballot counters at the State Farm Arena in Atlanta home at 10:30 p.m., Regina Waller, the Fulton County public affairs manager for elections, tells ABC News.”

https://twitter.com/abcpolitics/status/1323846118208376834

Video from that same night shows that after Republican poll watchers and news reporters went home, election workers stayed behind and continued counting the ballots. There is no visible water leak in the video.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/rPqQKvuFk473/

Video shows Fulton County election worker scanning the same ballots three times after Republican poll watchers and news reporters went home because of a “water leak.”

https://www.bitchute.com/video/6Bvf8xq1CsoJ/

July 15, 2021. Tags: , , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. 2 comments.

Double-Scanned Ballots Uncovered in Fulton County Election

https://rumble.com/vju1en-double-scanned-ballots-uncovered-in-fulton-county-election.html

 

July 14, 2021. Tags: , , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Tucker Carlson Presents ‘Meaningful Evidence of Voter Fraud’ in Georgia Election

https://rumble.com/vjuxir-tucker-presents-meaningful-evidence-of-voter-fraud-in-georgia-election.html

July 14, 2021. Tags: , , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Atlanta Journal-Constitution: “Some ballots initially double-counted in Fulton before recount”

https://www.ajc.com/politics/some-ballots-initially-double-counted-in-fulton-before-recount/GY4FTEEI6REIJN3SDKIDNIOYV4/

Some ballots initially double-counted in Fulton before recount

By Mark Niesse

July 13, 2021

The most obvious example of duplicates in the initial count occurred in a batch of 99 ballots first scanned the morning of Oct. 28, then scanned again about an hour later, with the second batch tallied in exact reverse order from the first. Those batches had 58 votes for Biden, 39 for Trump, one for Libertarian Jo Jorgensen and one for West.

Part or all of another batch of 98 ballots appeared to be scanned a second time within minutes on election night. Biden received 55 votes in the first of those batches and 56 in the second batch. Many of the ballots appeared to be identical.

Video at https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZT30qJPxxb1U/

July 14, 2021. Tags: , , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Ballot images prove that the same ballots were scanned multiple times in Fulton County, Georgia

Video at https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZT30qJPxxb1U/

Article at https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/07/hard-evidence-presented-duplicate-ballots-counted-fulton-county-georgia-2020-election/

July 14, 2021. Tags: , , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

When People Don’t Want an Audit – They Are Hiding Something

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/06/reminder-people-dont-want-audit-hiding-something/

When People Don’t Want an Audit – They Are Hiding Something

By Joe Hoft

June 21, 2021

The only people who fight to prevent an audit of their operation are people who have something to hide.

I have been involved in hundreds of audits around the world.  I’ve performed audits across the US, in Canada, the UK, Scotland, Spain, Portugal, South Africa, Argentina, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, China, Hong Kong, Malaysia, India, Singapore, Australia, and New Zealand.

I’ve performed operational audits, IT-related audits, financial audits, and fraud audits.

I’ve reported on processes, financials, IT, and operational activities, some of which were very good and some that were not.

In all the audits I’ve participated in I have never seen the ‘auditee’ (the person who owns the process or financials) complain the way the Democrats do in response to the audit going on in Maricopa County.

I’ve never had auditees select their own auditors and have them perform their audits to show everything was working fine before I performed my audit, like the Board of Supervisors did in Maricopa County.

(In this case, the selected auditors reviewed a couple of audit machines and said they were working fine and because of this, they claimed the entire 2020 election was fine. They didn’t look at a single ballot – 2.1 million ballots and they didn’t look at one.)

I’ve never seen an auditee complain to the media about the audit that I was performing.

I’ve never had an auditee beg me not to perform an audit of their shop.

I’ve never had an auditee threaten a lawsuit if I performed an audit.

I’ve never had a politician push his fellow politicians and agencies to stop an audit.

Nope, never had any of this happen.

June 21, 2021. Tags: , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

In Fulton County, Georgia, five sequential batches of absentee votes each appeared with the exact same vote count of 392 for Biden, 96 for President Donald Trump, and 3 for Libertarian Jo Jorgensen, a count that state officials admitted was a statistical impossibility

In Fulton County, Georgia, five sequential batches of absentee votes each appeared with the exact same vote count of 392 for Biden, 96 for President Donald Trump, and 3 for Libertarian Jo Jorgensen, a count that state officials admitted was a statistical impossibility.

Sources:

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/georgia-audit-documents-show-unsecured-missing-ballot-batches-ballots

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/06/explosive-development-georgia-investigators-29-page-elections-report-discovered-released-reveals-massive-election-integrity-problems

June 20, 2021. Tags: , , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

In Maricopa County, Arizona, 52 ballots all came from the same two-bedroom home

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/06/watch-maricopa-audit-liaison-says-need-investigate-anomalies-like-52-ballots-submitted-two-bedroom-home/

Maricopa Audit Liaison Says They Need to Investigate Anomalies — Like 52 Ballots Submitted From a Two-Bedroom Home

By Cassandra Fairbanks

June 19, 2021

Former Arizona Secretary of State and current senate liaison for the Maricopa County audit, Ken Bennett, has said that they need to investigate anomalies such as 52 ballots that came from a single two-bedroom home.

Bennett was giving an update on the next steps in the audit during an interview with John Fredricks on the Outside The Beltway podcast.

Additionally, Bennett stated that the Maricopa Board of Supervisors is refusing to provide information related to the routers used and administrative passwords for the tabulation machines.

Bennett explained that they are going through the envelopes to make sure that each one has a valid signature and that the person is a resident of Maricopa County. Ballots with unsigned envelopes are not permitted to be counted under the election laws.

“So, if the signatures don’t match or the signatures aren’t there, what happens?” Fredricks asked.

“Well, then part of our report would say that Maricopa County opened X numbers of thousands of envelopes and counted the ballots inside those envelopes that never should have been opened,” Bennett explained.

During the final minute of the interview, Bennett was asked to wrap up what people can expect to see from the audit in the next couple of weeks.

“There is still checking of voter registration anomalies,” he explained before citing “fifty two people voting from a two-bedroom home somewhere, or people voting twice, or dead people voting.”

“There’s going to be a few to several weeks of that type of investigation, and then there will probably be a few to several weeks of putting the whole report together,” he added. “The report’s going to be massive.”

 

June 20, 2021. Tags: , , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

What Difference Does Proving a Stolen Election Make? All the Difference in the World

https://townhall.com/columnists/wayneallynroot/2021/06/20/what-difference-does-proving-a-stolen-election-make-all-the-difference-in-the-world-n2591219

What Difference Does Proving a Stolen Election Make? All the Difference in the World

By Wayne Allyn Root

June 20, 2021

Remember that famous Hillary Clinton line about Benghazi? She asked, “What difference does it make?” She meant it’s over; it’s old news; why rehash it now? Nothing will change. Of course, that was convenient for Clinton and former President Barack Obama. They lied, and heroes died at Benghazi. The last thing Clinton or Obama wanted was an investigation.

Democrats are saying the same thing now about the 2020 election. They say: “What difference does it make? Donald Trump lost. It’s over. The election is certified. Joe Biden is the president. Nothing will change. You’re all wasting your time.” Again, that’s pretty convenient.

We are a nation of laws. That’s what made America the greatest nation in world history. Without laws, investigations, arrests and convictions, we might as well be Haiti, or Cuba, or Venezuela, or Zimbabwe, or Mexico or any other lawless socialist hellhole around the world. Where people live in misery and malaise, with no rights, while the government, despots and ruthless criminals do whatever they want to the people.

We are America. We can’t let that happen. We must investigate and pursue justice, no matter where it leads.

Forensic audits will uncover the truth. And the truth will set us free. The truth will prove — even to Democrats and dummies (I know, I repeat myself) — that we were right. Trump was cheated. The election was rigged and stolen. Trump is the real president. Biden is not the rightful president of the United States.

You can feel it. The tide has turned. We are so close to proving Arizona and Georgia were stolen. Some legislators from other states want to plan forensic audits. Soon all the dominoes will fall.

Proving the election was stolen will make all the difference in the world. Of course, Democrats and the fake news media frauds know that. That’s precisely what they’re so afraid of. They’re scared to death the truth is about to come out.

And yes, they’re scared to death because they don’t know where this will lead; they don’t know what the citizens will do once they realize the election was rigged and stolen.

Democrats will say it’s too late. They will argue: “Nothing can be done. Stolen election or not, Biden is president, end of story. Tough luck.” I’m not an elections lawyer or a constitutional scholar. I’ll leave the question of whether Trump can be reinstated as president up to legal experts.

But I know this: Bad things will happen to the Democrats if it’s proven they stole the election. All hell will break loose. Democrats are in a world of trouble, and they know it.

On the minor scale, here’s some of the things I could imagine happening next:

Once we can prove the election was stolen, Democrats are finished. This is like when a famous business mogul and philanthropist is found to be a criminal who stole everyone’s money. Ask Bernie Madoff. Everyone hates you for the rest of all time. You can never walk out of your home again. You can’t show your face in public. People scream “shame” at you wherever you go. Your legacy is destroyed forever.

Lawsuits will fly. Legal fees will cripple the Biden administration and the Democratic Party. Donations will dry up.

Biden will be the lame duck of all lame ducks. He will never pass another piece of legislation. He won’t be able to leave the White House. He might as well be a convicted criminal. The White House will be his prison cell.

Republicans will win a landslide in 2022. The GOP will control both houses of Congress. Even voters who don’t like Trump will feel guilty that his presidency was stolen. Trump will be a lock to win back the presidency in 2024.

That’s all separate from massive protests, million-man-marches on Washington, unrest, civil disobedience and the prospect of 74 million Trump voters withholding taxes to bring the Biden government to its knees and force Biden’s resignation.

And then there are the criminal charges. Thousands of Democrats were involved, in multiple states, in the greatest theft in America’s history. I call this treason. That’s life in prison, or worse. This won’t end well for Democrats.

So, now you know why they’re panicking. Wouldn’t you?

So, yes, proving the election was stolen is the whole ball of wax. It’s the whole kitchen sink. It changes both the history and the future of America.

God bless the forensic audits. And God help the Democrats when the American people see proof the election was stolen.

June 20, 2021. Tags: , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. 3 comments.

Why a Judge Has Georgia Vote Fraud on His Mind: ‘Pristine’ Biden Ballots That Looked Xeroxed

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2021/06/08/why_a_judge_has_georgia_vote_fraud_on_his_mind_pristine_biden_ballots_that_look_xeroxed_779795.html

Why a Judge Has Georgia Vote Fraud on His Mind: ‘Pristine’ Biden Ballots That Looked Xeroxed

By Paul Sperry

June 8, 2021

When Fulton County, Ga., poll manager Suzi Voyles sorted through a large stack of mail-in ballots last November, she noticed an alarmingly odd pattern of uniformity in the markings for Joseph R. Biden. One after another, the absentee votes contained perfectly filled-in ovals for Biden — except that each of the darkened bubbles featured an identical white void inside them in the shape of a tiny crescent, indicating they’d been marked with toner ink instead of a pen or pencil.

Adding to suspicions, she noticed that all of the ballots were printed on different stock paper than the others she handled as part of a statewide hand recount of the razor-thin Nov. 3 presidential election. And none was folded or creased, as she typically observed in mail-in ballots that had been removed from envelopes.

In short, the Biden votes looked like they’d been duplicated by a copying machine.

“All of them were strangely pristine,” said Voyles, who said she’d never seen anything like it in her 20 years monitoring elections in Fulton County, which includes much of Atlanta.

She wasn’t alone. At least three other poll workers observed the same thing in stacks of absentee ballots for Biden processed by the county, and they have joined Voyles in swearing under penalty of perjury that they looked fake.

Now election watchdogs have used their affidavits to help convince a state judge to unseal all of the 147,000 mail-in ballots counted in Fulton and allow a closer inspection of the suspicious Biden ballots for evidence of counterfeiting. They argue that potentially tens of thousands may have been manufactured in a race that Biden won by just 12,000 votes thanks to a late surge of mail-in ballots counted after election monitors were shooed from State Farm Arena in Atlanta.

“We have what is almost surely major absentee-ballot fraud in Fulton County involving 10,000 to 20,000 probably false ballots,” said Garland Favorito, the lead petitioner in the case and a certified poll watcher who runs VoterGa.org, one of the leading advocates for election integrity in the state.

(more…)

June 10, 2021. Tags: , , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Georgia poll watchers’ concerns about Biden ballots appearing photocopied led to watchdog inspection. Three poll watchers have sworn under penalty of perjury that the ballots looked fake.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSp1F7DNBZU

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/georgia-poll-watchers-concerns-about-biden-ballots-appearing-photocopied

Georgia poll watchers’ concerns about Biden ballots appearing photocopied led to watchdog inspection

Three poll watchers have sworn under penalty of perjury that the ballots looked fake.

By Joseph Weber

June 9, 2021

Concerns from a polling manager in Georgia’s Fulton County about the unusual uniformity of mail-in ballots is the basis for the court-delayed inspection effort that is expected to resume in the coming weeks.

Polling manager Suzi Voyles says that when counting absentee ballots for the 2020 presidential election, thousands of them, perhaps tens of thousands, for then-Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden appeared to have been photocopied. 

Voyles’ observation and similar ones from at least three other poll workers prompted them to come forward and swear under penalty of perjury that the ballots looked fake.

Election watchdogs have used their affidavits to help convince a state judge to unseal all of the 147,000 mail-in ballots counted in Fulton and allow a closer inspection of the suspicious Biden ballots for evidence of counterfeiting, The Epoch Times reports Tuesday. 

Voyles also said she noticed that all of the ballots were printed on paper different from others she handled as part of a statewide hand recount of the presidential election. 

She also said none were purportedly folded or creased, as she typically observed in mail-in ballots that had been removed from envelopes.

“All of them were strangely pristine,” said Voyles, who for 20 years has monitored elections in Fulton County, which includes much of Atlanta.

The watchdogs suspect as many as tens of thousands of the ballots may have been manufactured in a race that Biden won by just 12,000 votes, in large part because of the late surge in mail-in ballots counted after election monitors were asked to leave State Farm Arena in Atlanta.

“We have what is almost surely major absentee-ballot fraud in Fulton County involving 10,000 to 20,000 probably false ballots,” Garland Favorito, the lead petitioner in the case and a certified poll watcher who runs VoterGa.org, told The Epoch Times.

He and other petitioners were ordered to meet at a warehouse May 28 to settle the terms of the inspection of the absentee ballots. But the day before the scheduled meeting, the county filed a motion to dismiss the case, delaying the inspection indefinitely.

Favorito said the sides will be in court June 21 to resolve the motions. He expects talks over the logistics of the inspection to resume after the Fourth of July holiday, according to The Times.

 

June 10, 2021. Tags: , , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Election Workers Set to Be Deposed in Georgia Ballot Case

https://www.theepochtimes.com/election-workers-set-to-be-deposed-in-georgia-ballot-case_3850941.html

Election Workers Set to Be Deposed in Georgia Ballot Case

By Zachary Stieber

June 9, 2021

Several election workers in Fulton County, Georgia, are scheduled to be deposed in the coming days in a lawsuit that alleges thousands of fraudulent ballots were scanned in Atlanta on election night in 2020.

Ruby Freeman, her daughter Wandrea Moss, Caryn Ficklin, and Keisha Dixon were served with notices to appear for depositions in the case, according to court records.

Freeman and Moss were two of the workers in the absentee ballot counting room at State Farm Arena, when ballots were processed for some time on Nov. 3, 2020, with no observers, including no state election monitor.

Freeman is scheduled to be deposed on June 11. She was advised to bring a thumb drive containing images of all communications she made between Jan. 1, 2020, and Dec. 31, 2020, regarding the presidential election, according to a court document obtained by The Epoch Times. The communications include messages sent by cellphones, through email, on Snapchat, and over Facebook.

She was also told to bring all electronic devices she utilized during the same timeframe.

Moss, who was given similar orders, is slated to appear on June 10.

Dixon helped register voters while Ficklin works for the county.

Robert Cheeley, who is representing some of the plaintiffs in the case, asked for the depositions. Cheeley didn’t respond to repeated requests by The Epoch Times for comment, including a message left at his office with a secretary.

A Fulton County spokesperson declined to comment.

“Our position is that that’s premature. We want to get to the inspection and then we’ll figure out who we want to depose,” Garland Favorito, an election observer who is one of the petitioners, told people in an online chat over the weekend.

“I think it would nail down some of the issues, some of the things that are still unanswered at State Farm Arena. I think that’s [Cheeley’s] intent.”

Petitioners in the case asserted in December 2020 that election workers failed to comply with state laws governing the treatment of absentee ballots. That failure “created two classes that had two different standards” when it came to mail-in ballots, they alleged.

A county official told news outlets and people in a ballot counting room at roughly 11 p.m. on election night that counting was done for the evening, but workers soon resumed processing ballots. Republican observers said they left because of the announcement and a state election monitor was absent for 82 minutes, according to Gabriel Sterling, an official with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger’s office.

Sterling later said there was “managerial sloppiness” and “chain of custody” issues in the county, although county officials insisted nothing untoward happened.

Petitioners received low-resolution images of ballots in the case, but have more recently sought images that are at a quality of 600 dots per inch or higher. Henry County Superior Court Judge Brian Amero agreed to the request last month, but postponed the taking of new images after county agencies filed motions to dismiss the case.

A hearing on the motions will take place on June 21.

June 10, 2021. Tags: , , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

In California 3,000 Votes Were Recorded from an Empty Dorm Building

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/06/every-state-audited-california-3000-votes-recorded-empty-dorm-building/

In California 3,000 Votes Were Recorded from an Empty Dorm Building

June 5, 2021

The Santa Barbara News-Press reported this past week:

https://newspress.com/anatomy-of-an-investigation-into-a-non-investigation/

May 30, 2021

Approximately 3,000 mail-in ballots counted in the Nov. 3 election were supposedly cast by UCSB students residing in a voting precinct that, along with other dorm buildings, includes the Francisco Torres/Santa Catalina Residence Hall at 6850 El Colegio Road in Goleta.

Problem: Due to COVID-19, the Torres Building, which normally accommodates 1,300 students, was empty and locked down through most of 2020, as were all other UCSB dorms.

This means no students/voters were residing inside the Torres Building (nor any of the other dorms) during the election season.

It also means these ballots were fraudulent.

That’s because there’s a second problem: These ballots could not legally have been forwarded to students where they were actually living.

Why not?

Because forwarding ballots to alternative addresses is a felony.

Questions: Did someone at the Torres Building hijack ballots, mark and file them? Or did someone illegally forward the ballots to students living with their parents elsewhere?

THE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

Thomas Cole of Analytics 805, which monitors elections, uncovered the Goleta precinct’s voting irregularities during the course of his routine analysis. Alarmed by the phantom ballots he’d pinpointed, Mr. Cole called the Santa Barbara District Attorney’s Office for advice on how to file a criminal complaint alleging Fraud Corruption of the Voting Process.

The D.A.’s Office directed him to the Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Office.

Mr. Cole’s subsequent complaint, filed with the Sheriff’s Office, alleges that:

Someone in charge of the mail at the building illegally filled out those ballots for the students and sent all those ballots directly back to the election board, which is a felony.

Someone in charge of or with access to the ballots and signature machines simply ignored the phony signatures on the ballots returned from the Torres Building, which is a felony.

Or officials turned off the signature inspection machine.

Or officials lowered the threshold of the machine inspection on the Torres Building precinct ballots, thus allowing the approximate 3,000 fraudulent ballots to be counted, a felony.

Only a student actually residing in the Torres Building during October-November 2020 could have received a ballot to vote. And since the building was closed and locked down, that is impossible.

Thus, the 3,000 votes counted from the Torres Building are illegal.

THE “INVESTIGATION”?

Sgt. Joseph Schmidt, of the Sheriff Office’s Criminal Investigations Bureau, wrote an email of receipt to Mr. Cole and provided him with a case number: 21-2491.

Sgt. Schmidt added: “I will write a courtesy report and forward it to the University of California Santa Barbara Police Department.”

Two-and-a-half months later and no further word from Sergeant Schmidt and with no word whatsoever from the UCSB Police Department, Mr. Cole turned to The Investigator.

The Investigator wrote Sgt. Schmidt:

“I would like to know if your office has investigated or is currently investigating this complaint. Apparently, you were going to write a report and forward it to the UCSB Police Department. Has this been done? To whom was it sent, i.e. who is the best person to contact there? I would be most grateful if you would clarify who currently has jurisdiction over this complaint, along with names of officers assigned to it and any additional case numbers that may apply.”

Sgt. Schmidt responded by stating that the location of the complaint is within the jurisdiction of UCSB PD. He provided a direct number to its records department, from which The Investigator garnered the following information:

A report had indeed been received (in a timely fashion) by UCSB PD from the Sheriff’s Office.

UCSB PD had given the complaint its own case number: 21-0207.

The case was assigned to Cpl. Tiffany Little for follow-up.

Consequently, The Investigator sent Cpl. Little an email with these questions:

“1. Have you yet endeavored to investigate this complaint?

“2. If yes, what progress have you made?

“3. If the investigation has been concluded, what were its findings?”

(Neither UCSB PD Chief Alex Yao nor Operations Lt. Rob Romero had responded to The Investigator’s earlier email requests seeking clarification of this case.)

Two days later, The Investigator followed up with the following email to Cpl. Little, copied to Sgt. Jeff Lupo (her supervisor), along with Chief Yao and Lt. Romero:

“Since Thomas Cole, who filed this complaint, has not been contacted by anyone from UCSB PD to assess the mystery voting data that compelled him to file his complaint, I am left with the impression that nothing has been done to investigate this alleged felony crime. Please convince me otherwise before my column deadline tomorrow afternoon.”

Not 20 minutes later (19 to be precise), Cpl. Little telephoned The Investigator.

“It’s not us,” she explained. “SB County elections is not our jurisdiction.”

In that case, what did UCSB PD do with the complaint?

Said Cpl. Little, “We sent it to the D.A.’s office to sort out jurisdiction.”

“To whom may I speak with at the D.A.’s office who knows about this?”

“It doesn’t work like that,” replied Cpl. Little. “It happens electronically.”

Which sounds awfully like a black hole.

And is.

The Investigator telephoned the D.A.’s Office and spoke with James Blackburn, who identified himself as a legal office professional. Mr. Blackburn could find no record of having received either UCSB PD case number 21-0207. For good measure, he also checked the Sheriff’s Office case number 21-2419. Nada.

“Sometimes it takes two or three weeks to register,” he added helpfully. “Could you find out when they sent it?”

In other words, the old-fashioned runaround.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE

For a start, an investigating officer (if anyone can and wants to figure out the correct jurisdiction) should interview Mr. Cole and inspect his voting data.

All of the signatures from Torres Building ballots, currently in possession of the Santa Barbara County Election Division, should be matched to test for phony signatures.

If the signatures are phony — well, then: game, set, match.

If the signatures are genuine, someone in charge of the mail at the Torres Building illegally forwarded the ballots to students at their parents’ homes, which were then illegally accepted by the Elections Division, which operates within the purview of Joseph E. Holland, clerk, recorder and registrar of voters.

This is not rocket science.

A law enforcement officer investigating alleged fraud and corruption of the voting process should be able to interview whomever is in charge of mail at the Torres Building and determine if ballots were forwarded to students.

As Mr. Cole points out in his complaint: If they answer yes, it is a felony. If the answer is no, how did all those students get ballots to vote?

An investigating law enforcement officer should be able to interview election officials and gain access to the ballots in question to assess the veracity of ballot signatures.

After all, these are felony crimes, punishable by huge fines, disqualification from public office and up to three years in prison.

We are forever told by those who govern us that our right to vote is so very precious — sacrosanct, even. But when our choices for elective office are diluted with fake votes, our preciously sacrosanct vote becomes disenfranchised — and democracy suffers.

If election laws go unenforced, cheating and the candidates chosen by cheaters will endure and rule.

And there’s another important issue here: How can we, as a country, morally insist on monitoring the elections inside foreign countries when we, ourselves, are incapable of ensuring that our own elections are fair?

Mr. Cole told The Investigator that, nearly three months since sounding the alarm, he has lost faith in the ability of local law enforcement to investigate voter fraud. He now intends to file his complaint with the FBI.

Perhaps the Bureau will also investigate why law enforcement in Santa Barbara is sluggishly reluctant to investigate and enforce its own voting irregularities.

WHISTLE-BLOWERS WELCOME

There is, clearly, something terribly wrong with this picture.

Has Santa Barbara’s law enforcement community (including the D.A.’s Office) been politicized into ignoring complaints that do not fit a mainstream election narrative?

Are we living in a county that ignores legitimate complaints about illegal irregularities in the voting process?

The Investigator would like to hear from anyone who may have insider knowledge about why this voter fraud claim has not been investigated and (even more so) if there has been a concerted effort to cover up the fraudulent votes from UCSB’s Torres Building (and the other dorms).

Whistle-blowers are protected by law — and this column pledges to shield their identities.

June 5, 2021. Tags: , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Judge orders audit of paper ballots in Fulton County, Georgia. Video proves election officials lied when they told the mainstream media they “stopped” counting votes for the night because of a “water leak.”

By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)

May 21, 2021

On election night, when the mainstream media reported that Fulton County, Georgia, had “stopped” counting votes for the night because of a “water leak,” I immediately suspected that they were cheating.

A few days later, video was released, which showed the Republican poll watchers, news reporters, and other people leaving. However, a few election workers stayed behind, and continued counting paper ballots. And there is no visible water leak in the video. Ever since I first saw that video, this has always been what I consider to be the #1 biggest example of proof of cheating in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election.

To this very day, other than cheating, no one has explained why election workers lied to the mainstream media about “stopping” the counting for the night because of a “water leak.”

CBS News, November 3, 2020: “Pipe burst in Georgia delays vote counting”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C25DAAHZdEw

https://www.bitchute.com/video/MkqNtENpjyii/

ABC News, November 3, 2020: “The election department sent the ballot counters at the State Farm Arena in Atlanta home at 10:30 p.m., Regina Waller, the Fulton County public affairs manager for elections, tells ABC News.”

https://twitter.com/abcpolitics/status/1323846118208376834

https://web.archive.org/web/20201104043502/https://twitter.com/abcpolitics/status/1323846118208376834

This video shows Republican poll watchers, news reporters, and other people leaving. However, a few election workers stay behind and continue counting votes. And there is no visible water leak in the video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keANzinHWUA

https://www.bitchute.com/video/rPqQKvuFk473/

CNN, May 21, 2021: “Another ballot audit set to move ahead in Fulton County, Georgia, as judge rules absentee ballots can be unsealed”

https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/21/politics/georgia-ballot-audit-fulton-county/index.html

May 21, 2021. Tags: , , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

The ABC News affiliate from Scranton, PA, says that in Luzerne County, PA, a “coding error” by Dominion affects Republican ballots, but not Democratic ones

https://www.wnep.com/article/news/local/luzerne-county/election-machines-voting-luzerne-county/523-025cb220-f839-4fda-91f4-125ed6bcc0c4

Voting machine typo causing concern for some Luzerne County voters

Several precincts are reporting issues with Republican ballots.

By Chelsea Strub 

May 18, 2021

LUZERNE COUNTY, Pa. — Primary Election Day is off to a rocky start in Luzerne County. What election officials are calling a “typo” is making Republican voters uneasy.

Some voting locations are reporting that when Republicans go up to the machine to vote, an introduction screen says “Official Democratic Ballot.”

The judge of elections at a polling place in Kingston Township said he paused voting Tuesday morning until this was addressed. He said election officials in Wilkes-Barre told him this is a typo and when voters go to the next screen, the republican ballot loads. They also cross-checked it with an emergency Republican paper ballot to be sure.

When registered Republicans went to vote, after poll workers pulled up their ballots, the welcome screen said, “Official Democratic Ballot.” This made Republican voters uneasy, but elections officials tell us it had nothing to do with the legitimacy of the votes. They call it a coding error.

Republican voters all over the county saw this screen before voting.

“There was considerable confusion. They refer to it as miscoding. It’s hard to imagine how something like that slips by people. It was explained well the person that came to the polling place,” said Dudley Snyder from Kingston.

Luzerne County election officials say it was a coding error with the vendor Dominion Voting Systems that led to the misprint on the introductory voting screen, but they say that is where the error ended.

“We want to assure everybody that what happens is when you are a registered Republican, we have a specific code for that ballot. And once we punch that code in, even though the header says something like, ‘Democratic ballot.’ it’s actually for the races that are in the Republican party,” said Luzerne County Director of Election Bob Morgan.
Morgan says Republican votes on the machines will be counted correctly as the ballots print out with proper Republican voter information. Voters confirmed this to Newswatch 16.

“Came out of the machine, on the paper was marked ‘Republican.’ All of the candidates that I voted for the word were Republican. If that doesn’t get counted correctly, it’s beyond the scope of any of us to do anything about it,” Dudley said.

Voters who do not want to vote at the machines are given the option to vote by provisional ballot at the polls, but it still leaves some voters in Luzerne County feeling uneasy.

“If a coding error can get the name wrong name at the top, how do you know there aren’t coding errors that can screw up the cast, the counting of the ballots themselves?” Dudley asked. “It’s going to take a long time; I think before anybody gets any degree of comfort with it anymore.”

The error concerned Republican party leaders in the county.

“I went in to vote myself, and it happened to me also, so we have a great concern as a Republican Party to instill that the integrity of the election process,” said Justin Behrens, chair of the Luzerne County Republican Party.

Behrens said he called legal counsel and came to the courthouse to file a lawsuit to impound all voting machines and switch to paper ballots immediately. Instead, county officials and Republican and Democrat party leaders reached a compromise: All voting machines will be locked up and secured after the election and available for an audit.

“We’re going to make sure that all the equipment that’s used is going to be secured and locked safe for us to do an investigation or do or to do whatever we want to do to check it out as a party,” Behrens said.
Republican voters have an option at the polls for the rest of the day.

“Any Republican voter who wants to vote in this primary election today who has not voted it yet can go to their polling place, and they will be given an option of voting on the machine, by voting with an emergency ballot, or by voting with a provisional ballot without the requirement of an affirmation,” explained attorney Michael Butera.

May 21, 2021. Tags: , , , . Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

The Data Drives Deleted by the Maricopa County Included Adjudicated Files (Where Votes Were Changed)

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/breaking-exclusive-data-drives-deleted-maricopa-county-included-adjudicated-files-votes-changed/

The Data Drives Deleted by the Maricopa County Included Adjudicated Files (Where Votes Were Changed)

By Joe Hoft

May 13, 2021

There are many material items noted in the letter from Arizona Senator Karen Fann to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors Chairman, Jack Sellers.  But one item not provided by the County and apparently deleted is a very important piece of data that the County did not want the auditors to see. 

Late last night we reported on the letter sent to Maricopa County Board of Supervisors Chairman from Karen Fann at the Arizona Senate.  The Senate has hired auditors to audit the 2020 Election in the County.  Many significant and material issues were noted in the letter related to the audit last night.  Many items were not supplied to the auditors.  One item that bears mention is related to some of the files that were deleted before data was provided to the auditors.

The Senate stated in their shocking letter the following items were missing:

We have recently discovered that the entire “Database” directory from the D drive of the machine “EMSPrimary” has been deleted. This removes election related details that appear to have been covered by the subpoena.  In addition, the main database for the Election Management System (EMS) Software, “Results Tally and Reporting,” is not located anywhere on the EMSPrimary machine, even though all of the EMS Clients reference that machine as the location of the database. This suggests that the main database for all election-related data for the November 2020 General Election has been removed. Can you please advise as to why these folders were deleted, and whether there are any backups that may contain the deleted folders?

The image below shows the location of the files known to be deleted. In addition, the main database for “Results Tally and Reporting” is not present.

Here is a tweet with the files deleted noted:

https://web.archive.org/web/20210513021723/https://twitter.com/ArizonaAudit/status/1392656033496006656

https://twitter.com/ArizonaAudit/status/1392656033496006656

The tweet from Maricopa Arizona Audit says:

Breaking Update: Maricopa County deleted a directory full of election databases from the 2020 election cycle days before the election equipment was delivered to the audit. This is spoliation of evidence!

The tweet includes this image:

maricopa tweet

 

 

If you look closely at the files that were deleted, you will see that they include adjudicated ballot files.  These would include ballots that were reviewed by someone (the system won’t tell you who) and manipulated by that person (the system won’t tell you when) and likely changed to Biden votes.

We have known this for some time.  The adjudication process is currently designed to allow voter fraud through changing votes from one candidate to another.

We know there is massive fraud in Maricopa because Biden somehow miraculously outperformed Hillary in the county at 150% and became the first Democrat since Truman to win the county.

As we noted above, spoilation of evidence is a serious offence, much like tampering with evidence is.  Penalties include prison sentences.  Do you think the Maricopa Board of Supervisors would risk going to prison over evidence they destroyed that didn’t show massive voter fraud?

May 13, 2021. Tags: , , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. 1 comment.

Maricopa County Ballot Batches Off by 17.5%, ‘Likely Joe Biden Did Not Win Arizona’

https://rumble.com/vgzj2p-maricopa-county-ballot-batches-off-by-17.5-likely-joe-biden-did-not-win-ari.html

May 13, 2021. Tags: , , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Maricopa Auditors Find ‘Significant Discrepancies’ Between Number of Ballots and Batch Reports in Each Box

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/maricopa-auditors-find-significant-discrepancies-number-ballots-batch-reports-box/

Maricopa Auditors Find ‘Significant Discrepancies’ Between Number of Ballots and Batch Reports in Each Box

By Cassandra Fairbanks

May 13, 2021

Ballot auditors in Maricopa County are reporting that they have found “significant discrepancies” between the number of ballots therein and the batch reports included in the boxes.

Arizona Senate Republicans are in their third week of recounting 2.1 million Maricopa County ballots by hand.

The state senate is now asking Maricopa County officials to appear at a meeting next week to answer questions about “serious issues” that they have uncovered.

Maricopa Arizona Audit tweeted:

Breaking Update: As we open boxes of ballots delivered by Maricopa County, we are discovering significant discrepancies between the number of ballots therein and the batch reports included in the boxes.

Source:

https://web.archive.org/web/20210513182640/https://twitter.com/ArizonaAudit/status/1392888273631068164

https://twitter.com/ArizonaAudit/status/1392888273631068164

The auditors have been reporting 5-15 percent discrepancies across many boxes, with the number consistently growing. Joe Biden supposedly won the county by only 2.2 percent, according to the official results.

Political strategist Boris Epshteyn said on an appearance on Steve Bannon’s War Room show that the discrepancies may actually be as high as 17.5 percent — making it likely that “Biden did not win Arizona.”

The National File reports that the “Arizona Senate President recently sent a letter to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, outlining the major issues discovered already in the audit, and offering to settle them without additional subpoenas or compulsory action. In the letter, says Epshteyn on Steve Bannon’s podcast, it reveals, ‘Pallet five, batch 2976, 200 pink slip total, actual total 165. They are missing 35 ballots out of that batch.’ He added, ’35 out of 100 is 17.5%. 10 out of 200 is 5%.’”

Video: Maricopa County Ballot Batches Off by 17.5%, ‘Likely Joe Biden Did Not Win Arizona’

https://rumble.com/vgzj2p-maricopa-county-ballot-batches-off-by-17.5-likely-joe-biden-did-not-win-ari.html

“Do you know how shocking that is? 17.5% discrepancy in a batch is beyond belief.” He added, “In one they’ve got 18 more than there’s supposed to be, which is a 9% discrepancy. Again, if we are to have any confidence in elections in this country, how can we possibly be okay with discrepancies of double digit percentages? It’s absolutely mind boggling, anything above a tiny fraction of a percentage is unacceptable, by the way, unacceptable according to the Federal Elections Commission.”

May 13, 2021. Tags: , , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Next Page »