Video: Election supervisor shows how easy it is for election workers to change votes to whatever they want
https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1336888380940947457
https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1336888380940947457
Jovan Pulitzer says Georgia Called in Trucks to Get Rid of the Evidence in Fulton County He is Supposed to be Scanning!
Jovan Pulitzer says Georgia Called in Trucks to Get Rid of the Evidence in Fulton County He is Supposed to be Scanning!
Jim Hoft
December 31, 2020
Inventor Jovan Pulitzer joined radio host Monica Matthews on Thursday after his explosive testimony in the Georgia Senate Judiciary subcommittee on Elections on Wednesday.
Jovan Pulitzer destroyed Georgia’s corrupted 2020 election process and results during the hearing on Wednesday. Pulitzer explained how he can look at the Georgia ballots and determine almost immediately if a ballot is fraudulent or not. Pulitzer notes that he can look at 500,000 ballots in a couple hours.
Pulitzer then broke into a Dominion Voting Machine real-time during the hearing.
https://twitter.com/NetworksManager/status/1344376946914979844
Then following the hearing the subcommittee unanimously passed a motion to audit Fulton County’s absentee ballots with the process Pulitzer outlined during the hearing.
During Thursday’s discussion with Monica Matthews the two discussed the process of exposing ballot fraud via technology along with very heartfelt personal reasons every American should demand the integrity of this election be upheld. Pulitzer also confirmed that China is in fact, online with a GA polling station TODAY.
Then Jovan Pulitzer dropped this bomb!
Pulitzer told Monica Matthews that as soon as he was tasked with auditing the Fulton County ballots trucks pulled up to the facility and the ballots were being loaded into the trucks and were being shredded.
Jovan Pulitzer: “I’d like your permission of you and your fine audience that as I answer you that I have your permission to piss you off… The very minute that order went through and that order was followed, and all the legal notices were done, it didn’t even take four hours later where moving trucks with this stuff was backed up to those buildings trying to get rid of the evidence.”
Where the hell is the FBI and DOJ?
Do we have law enforcement anymore in this country?
Or is their only purpose to harass conservatives?
Oomf! Dominion CEO LIED! Said Voting Machines “Are Not Connected to Internet” — That Was Before Jovan Pulitzer Broke into a Dominion Machine during Live Testimony Using Internet
Oomf! Dominion CEO LIED! Said Voting Machines “Are Not Connected to Internet” — That Was Before Jovan Pulitzer Broke into a Dominion Machine during Live Testimony Using Internet
By Jim Hoft
December 31, 2020
Dominion Voting Machines’ CEO John Poulos says their machines are not designed to be online.
Poulos made the statement during testimony before the Michigan State Oversight Committee on December 15, 2020.
John Poulos told the committee, “Additionally, voting systems are by design are meant to be used as closed systems that are not networked meaning they are not connected to the internet.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3uUvTlrb10
That was the CEO of Dominion just two weeks ago.
Then this happened.
On Wednesday during his live testimony before the Georgia Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Elections, inventor Jovan Hutton Pulitzer hacked into a Dominion Voting Machine — LIVE during his testimony.
Pulitzer confirmed that the Georgia runoff IS connected to the internet.
He established a two-way communication from a polling pad in a voting center.
“At this very moment at a polling location in the county, not only do we have access through the devices to the poll pad–the system, but WE ARE IN,” Pulitzer said.
He continued, “And it’s not supposed to have WiFi and that’s not supposed to be able to happen so we’ve documented now it’s communicating two ways in real time, meaning it’s receiving data and sending data — should never happen, shouldn’t be WiFi, we’ve now documented it in real-time.”
Jovan Pulitzer just exposed the Dominion CEO as a confirmed liar.
These voting machines should be outlawed from use in future elections!
https://twitter.com/NetworksManager/status/1344376946914979844
Georgia County Official: Raffensperger Sent Armed Secretary of State Agents with Handcuffs to the County After They Complained about the Inaccurate Dominion Machines (VIDEO)
Georgia County Official: Raffensperger Sent Armed Secretary of State Agents with Handcuffs to the County After They Complained about the Inaccurate Dominion Machines (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
December 30, 2020
Coffee County Georgia officials sent out a letter in early December to Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. County officials told Raffensperger they were not able to duplicate the election night results on their Dominion voting machines.
Since they couldn’t duplicate their numbers with the fancy new voting machines they went with their original numbers.
On Wednesday morning a Coffee County official spoke before Georgia’s Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Elections. The woman told the subcommittee that when their county complained to Secretary of State Raffensperger about the voting machines and the recounts Secretary Raffensperger sent armed Secretary of State officials with handcuffs and two Dominion operators to the county.
She said Raffensperger was intentionally threatening the county officials.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxVqop8ZR1Y
Georgia election supervisor shows how easy it is to CHEAT during ballot adjudication process
Georgia election supervisor shows how easy it is to CHEAT during ballot adjudication process
December 30, 2020
A Georgia election supervisor demonstrated to members at a Georgia Senate Judiciary hearing this morning how easy it is to cheat during the adjudication process for ballots using the Dominion software:
https://twitter.com/kylenabecker/status/1344374038110597120
https://twitter.com/kylenabecker/status/1344374038110597120
This is insane. Ballots should be in a read-only mode after they are scanned and election supervisors should not have the ability to change anything. If someone screwed up and voted for both Biden and Trump, that part of the ballot should be discarded by the computer. But the election supervisor shouldn’t have the ability to alter anything.
Adding to the madness, a caucus chair who was involved in the recount pointed out how they rescanned 15k ballots five different times and they could never get the same count each time they scanned. She said the variance was around 50 each time they scanned the ballots, and their scans never matched the manual recount nor the initial count on election night:
https://twitter.com/kylenabecker/status/1344374096797331456
https://twitter.com/kylenabecker/status/1344374096797331456
If you are scanning ballots, getting an accurate count should not be this hard. States need to be forced to dump Dominion software and let’s just all go back to paper ballots.
RAFFENSPERGER GETS CAUGHT: Georgia Ballots Were Printed DIFFERENTLY for GOP Areas vs. DEM Areas – Election Was Rigged!
RAFFENSPERGER GETS CAUGHT: Georgia Ballots Were Printed DIFFERENTLY for GOP Areas vs. DEM Areas – Election Was Rigged!
By Jim Hoft
December 30, 2020
Members of Georgia’s Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Elections and members of the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing to study Georgia’s Election Laws, and the numerous voting irregularities in the 2020 presidential election.
The hearing comes after a Senate subcommittee held a hearing last week at the capitol to discuss perceived voting irregularities in November’s presidential election.
During the hearing witness Jovan Pulitzer was invited to testify on the irregularities in the November 3rd election.
Jovan Pulitzer is a brilliant inventor and author best known for creating and patenting CRQ and has founded companies that included seed investment rounds ranging from $1.6m to over $250m.
Joe Hoft wrote about this brilliant man first here at The Gateway Pundit.
On Tuesday Jovan Pulitzer revealed the differences between ballots printed for Democrat precincts versus Republican precincts.
The Republican precincts had a barcode up in the right-hand corner.
The votes from two different areas are printed differently.
This caused GOP votes to get kicked out by the Dominion machines.
Secretary of State Raffensperger allowed this to take place in a historically red state.
Raffensperger should be brought up on charges immediately.
Georgia Senate votes to let Jovan Hutton Pulitzer – an inventor and forensics expert – examine Fulton County’s absentee ballots. In these videos, he explains how he will look for fraud. If the election workers in Fulton County did cheat, they should be very, very scared of this guy.
By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)
December 30, 2020
Jovan Hutton Pulitzer is a first rate inventor with a huge number of patents.
In this video from several days ago, Pulitzer explains how he could detect cheating in absentee ballots:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgeqGmvQXKs
This second video is testimony that Pulitzer just gave today at a Georgia election hearing. He goes into more detail about how he would look for cheating:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PpyoYlGqBg
And this video is the Georgia Senate from today, voting to let Pulitzer examine the ballots from Fulton County:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-YqbsVg8ow
If the election workers in Fulton County did cheat, they should be very, very scared of this guy.
GA Senate passes motion to give Pulitzer access to Fulton County absentee ballots
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-YqbsVg8ow
Jovan Hutton Pulitzer Testimony @ GA Senate Judiciary Committee
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PpyoYlGqBg
Dominion system hacked live during Georgia election hearing
https://twitter.com/tracybeanz/status/1344350454218686464
https://www.worldtribune.com/dominion-system-hacked-live-during-georgia-election-hearing/
Dominion system hacked live during Georgia election hearing
December 30, 2020
A witness at Wednesday’s state Senate hearing in Georgia was able to access, in real time, the Dominion system at a Georgia polling place.
Inventor Jovan Hutton Pulitzer established a two-way communication from a polling pad in a voting center.
“At this very moment at a polling location in the county, not only do we have access through the devices to the poll pad, the system, but WE ARE IN,” Pulitzer said.
He continued: “And it’s not supposed to have WiFi and that’s not supposed to be able to happen so we’ve documented now it’s communicating two ways in real time, meaning it’s receiving data and sending data — should never happen, shouldn’t be WiFi, we’ve now documented it in real time.”
Georgia’s Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Elections and members of the Senate Judiciary Committee held the hearing to study Georgia’s Election Laws and the numerous voting irregularities in the 2020 presidential election.
Pulitzer also revealed differences between ballots printed for Democrat precincts versus Republican precincts, which he said caused GOP votes to get kicked out by the Dominion Voting Systems machines.
Pulitzer confirmed that the system tabulating votes in the two Senate runoffs in Georgia is connected to the Internet.
“That’s going on right there where everyone is voting [in the Georgia runoff],” he said.
Pulitzer said: “I have no regard for the smoking mirrors of how the machines work, the hidden stuff in the code, or how this machine is supposed to be programmed. If the machine worked according to programming none of us would be standing here. We’re here because something broke.
“So I’m saying ‘I don’t care about the machine’. I don’t even care about the code that was written in the machine. What I care about is that physical artifact. And you know what? That physical artifact has material differences from district to district that should not be there … why are they there?”
Pulitzer said the people of Georgia trusted state officials to ensure the election was valid and fraud free. The current election results are flawed, he said: “This isn’t the beating of a drum, this is the burning of a city.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PpyoYlGqBg
DOJ Adviser Lott: Trump votes subtracted, Biden votes inflated
You can read John Lott’s study at:
https://www.oann.com/doj-adviser-lott-trump-votes-subtracted-biden-votes-inflated/
DOJ Adviser Lott: Trump votes subtracted, Biden votes inflated
December 30, 2020
Senior Adviser to the Justice Department John Lott reveals voter fraud was rampant in this year’s elections.
In his new study, Lott revealed an unusual pattern of subtracting Trump votes from the final tally and adding excess votes to Joe Biden.
He found more than 11,000 Trump votes were subtracted in Fulton County, Georgia and another 44,000 Trump votes were wiped out in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
Lott also discovered that Biden received 289,000 “excess” votes across five battleground states and it’s unclear where those votes come from. President Trump shared the study on Twitter. He said elections officials gave Biden hundreds-of-thousands of fake votes.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1344173684983017473
Georgia Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Unanimously Passes Motion to Audit Fulton County’s Absentee Ballots Using Method Outlined by Jovan Pulitzer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgeqGmvQXKs
Georgia Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Unanimously Passes Motion to Audit Fulton County’s Absentee Ballots Using Method Outlined by Jovan Pulitzer
By Cristina Laila
December 30, 2020
Members of Georgia’s Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Elections and members of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday held a hearing to study Georgia’s Election Laws, and their past and present impact on the current Election cycle.
The star of the show on Wednesday was inventor Jovan Pulitzer.
Pulitzer explained how he could quickly audit their results using his technique of identifying fraudulent paper ballots and said he will do it for free.
Mr. Pulitzer said he has “no regard for the smoke and mirrors of how the machines work.” – IT’S ALL ABOUT THE PAPER BALLOTS.
“I don’t care about the machine. I don’t even care about the code that was written in the machine. What I care about is that physical artifact [ballot] and that physical artifact has material differences district to district that should not be there.”
Pulitzer said it would take him two hours to look at 500,000 ballots.
The Georgia State Senate Judiciary Subcomittee unanimously passed a motion to audit Fulton County’s absentee ballots with the process Pulitzer outlined during today’s hearing.
WATCH:
https://twitter.com/rusttt34/status/1344384542270869505
https://twitter.com/rusttt34/status/1344384542270869505
Watch Pulitzer explain his method to audit absentee ballots:
https://twitter.com/JovanHPulitzer/status/1343962532583759873
Video shows white woman assaulting black teen, and falsely accusing him of stealing her phone
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLjSw5EPlWU
https://www.yahoo.com/news/woman-expected-charged-alleged-hotel-135850449.html
Woman expected to be charged in alleged hotel attack involving Black teen
By Biba Adams
December 30, 2020
NYPD officials say their review of security camera footage from the Arlo Hotel in SoHo made all the difference.
The New York Police Department has announced it will be pursuing charges against the woman who attacked Keyon Harrold Jr. after falsely accusing the teen of stealing her iPhone.
The identity of the young white woman has not yet been released.
According to Rodney Harrison, the NYPD chief of detectives, their review of security camera footage from the Arlo Hotel in SoHo made all the difference.
“After we were able to get video,” Harrison said at a news briefing. “we’re now looking to charge this individual with assault and maybe even look at grand larceny or maybe even attempted robbery.”
The Manhattan district attorney’s office is also investigating the Saturday incident.
Grammy Award-winning jazz musician Keyon Harrold described it on his Instagram page. The account quickly went viral.
“This incident went on for five more minutes, me protecting my son from this lunatic. She scratched me; she Tackled and grabbed him,” Harrold wrote in the caption of the minute-long clip. In it, the woman can be seen repeatedly lunging at Harrold and his son, demanding that they prove the 14-year-old boy does not have her phone.
While the boy was not seriously injured, Harrold sustained minor scratches as he protected his child. He has also said his entire family is traumatized by the incident.
“My son, over and over again, he tells his mom, he tells me, ‘Why would she think that I would take her phone?’” Harrold told NBC News.
The family has retained attorney Benjamin Crump, who is calling on the New York D.A.’s office to charge the woman with assault and battery.
“This is what it will take to drive change,” Crump said in a statement. “It’s deeply troubling that incidents like this one, in which a Black child is viewed as and treated like a criminal, continue to happen.”
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio called the incident an example of racism.
“It would be horrific at any age, but it’s especially offensive that it happened to a child,” de Blasio said in a tweet. “To Keyon Harrold Jr. and his family: I am so sorry this happened to you. Her behavior was an affront to our city’s values.”
Arlo Hotels also issued a statement of apology for not “de-escalating” the situation. Harrold contends the hotel manager empowered the young woman by also demanding that the boy show the phone.
Hotel officials said the phone was later returned by an Uber driver.
It’s a Miracle! The Flu Is Eradicated!
https://wheelgunr.blogspot.com/2020/12/its-miracle-flu-is-eradicated.html
It’s a Miracle! The Flu Is Eradicated!
December 29, 2020
Or maybe not. Weekly U.S. Influenza Surveillance Report | CDC.
Maybe this falls under the heading of Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics. Do you think we cured the Flu, do you think they are ignoring the Flu, or do you think government is lying to you? (Hint: EVERYONE is lying to you.)
As usual, click the images for a larger view.
Flu map for week 51 from the 2019-2020 Flu Season (from the CDC page linked above). Last year week 51 ended on Dec 21, 2019.
And a similar map from the 2020-2021 Flu season, for week 51 – which ended Dec 19, 2020.
Part of the caption (from 2019) reads…
This map use the proportion of outpatient visits to healthcare providers for influenza-like illness to measure the ILI activity level within a state.
Gee, do you think that “influenza-like illness” is getting counted differently this year? Hat tip to Twitter and Dr. David Samadi, MD.
As for Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics, the origin of the phrase is confused, but it seem Benjamin Disraeli never said that.
“For Five States to Stop Counting on Election Night Is Absolutely Unprecedented” – Sidney Powell Lays Out Evidence of Rampant Election Fraud in Latest Interview
“For Five States to Stop Counting on Election Night Is Absolutely Unprecedented” – Sidney Powell Lays Out Evidence of Rampant Election Fraud in Latest Interview
By Jim Hoft
December 29, 2020
Attorney Sidney Powell joined Todd Herman for a radio interview on Tuesday.
When asked about what her “Elevator Pitch” would be to the Supreme Court, she responded with undeniable truths.
Via Twitter user Murray:
“The very night of the election many people saw something that they had never seen before in the history of our elections. They saw votes being changed on the screen in front of them, going from President Donald Trump to Joe Biden. On top of that, the morning after the election, even that night, the voting stopped. They stopped counting in multiple districts at the same time before the vote got to 270 electors for President Trump. That’s never happened before. The only time votes have ever stopped being counted in this country on election night was when the Broward County problem developed over Hanging Chad’s in one county in FL. So for FIVE states to stop counting on election night is absolutely UNPRECEDENTED. And they did it because the vote count for the electoral college was about to hit [+ go over] 270 for President Donald Trump, because of the massive outpouring of votes for him that night. By the next morning, multiple mathematicians had contacted me and told me they knew the algorithm that had been run to change the votes. It was that obvious to people with mathematical expertise. It is a mathematical impossibility for 100’s of thousands of votes to show up for VP Biden alone and to have been injected into the system the way that they were. We have eye-witness testimony of countless people who saw votes coming in, in unsecured containers and improper means and looking different the night of the election. These people have come forward at great personal risk to themselves & their families to provide thousands of affidavits of voting abnormalities and actual crimes that they witnessed happen on election night. The very fact that the other side is working so hard to hide all of this. Federal law requires transparency in our electoral process and our elections.”
There is a federal statute that requires all the documents pertaining to the election to be maintained for 22 months following an election, for the very reason that it has to be completely auditable. A Federal Judge in October [in ATL] found all kinds of problems w/ the Dominion system that GA bought and crammed down for everybody across the state to use. That’s where the most problems have been, is in GA. Witnesses have come forward, there was supposedly a water leak that they shut down voting for. That was an abject lie. We have video of witnesses pulling suspect ballots out from under a table after they ran off all the observers. Somebody told me that one of the people that did that has told gov’t officials how it happened and what happened. But has that information been provided to the public? No. There is rampant voter fraud of all kinds. Federal violations of 5 years + more across the country by virtue of all the misconduct on election night. The flipping of votes by Dominion is even advertised, on their ability to do that, to run a fraction, to make a Biden vote count 1.26% and a Trump vote to only count 0.74%. They’ve done it before. They’ve done it in Venezuela. They done it in other foreign countries. They’ve done it in THIS country. We have evidence even that it was done in 2016 in CA to benefit Hillary over Bernie Sanders, and it’s been done in other local elections and smaller elections in different places. This is the only time it’s been this widespread, and the reason it didn’t work this time, they’ve been able to shave these votes for a long time, but the reason it didn’t work completely this time and they had to shut down in so many places was because so many Trump supporters poured out on the day of the election to vote for President Donald Trump in what was a LANDSLIDE victory, a historic victory, is because it BROKE the algorithm. That’s why they had to stop counting that night. That’s why they had to bring in ballots and try to back-fill. And it still doesn’t work, because there are still 100’s of thousands of more votes than there were voters to vote them. The math simply doesn’t add up. And if they had nothing to hide, why aren’t they providing transparency into the voting systems of the United States of America, the country that is founded upon the Rule of Law and is supposed to be above all this? It is absolutely the most appalling criminal operation in the history of our country.”
Trump campaign asks Supreme Court to review Wisconsin voter fraud case
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-campaign-supreme-court-review-wisconsin-voter-fraud-case
Trump campaign asks Supreme Court to review Wisconsin voter fraud case
Seeks review before Congress meets to certify the Electoral College on Jan. 6
By Thomas Barrabi
December 29, 2020
President Trump’s legal team petitioned the US Supreme Court on Tuesday to consider its challenge of an earlier decision by the Wisconsin Supreme Court to dismiss its claims of irregularities in the use of absentee ballots during the 2020 presidential campaign.
Trump campaign attorney Rudy Giuliani filed the petition for a Writ of Certiorari weeks after the Wisconsin Supreme Court voted 4-3 to dismiss a Trump campaign lawsuit that sought to overturn the state’s election results. The president’s legal team asked the Supreme Court for an expedited review of the matter before Congress meets to certify the Electoral College’s vote results on Jan. 6.
“Regrettably, the Wisconsin Supreme Court, in their 4-3 decision, refused to address the merits of our claim. This ‘Cert Petition’ asks them to address our claims, which, if allowed, would change the outcome of the election in Wisconsin,” Trump campaign attorney Jim Troupis said in a statement. “Three members of the Wisconsin State Supreme Court, including the Chief Justice, agreed with many of the President’s claims in written dissents from that court’s December 14 order.”
The Wisconsin Supreme Court struck down the Trump campaign’s lawsuit on Dec. 14 just hours before President-elect Joe Biden received the state’s 10 electoral votes. Trump attorneys sought to invalidate more than 221,000 ballots in Milwaukee and Dane counties, both of which are Democratic strongholds. Biden won Wisconsin by roughly 20,600 votes.
The court determined that three of the four claims included in the Trump lawsuit were filed too late in the election process to be considered. A fourth claim was determined to be without merit.
The Trump campaign said the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s decision effectively “allowed over 50,000 illegal absentee ballots in violation of Article II of the U.S. Constitution and Wisconsin law.”
The petition notes several instances in which the Trump campaign alleges wrongdoing, including more than 28,000 votes counted from people “who failed to provide identification by abusing the state’s ‘indefinitely confined status’” and about 6,000 absentee ballots that were counted despite a purported lack of required information on their envelopes.
Trump’s legal team filed a separate petition with the Supreme Court regarding claims of fraud in the use of mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania on Dec. 20. The Supreme Court has yet to indicate whether it will hear that challenge in an expedited manner, as requested by the campaign.
The president has continued to challenge election results across several state even as the Biden team moves forward with transition proceedings. Biden is slated to be inaugurated on Jan. 20.
Giuliani reveals Trump campaign is filing new Supreme Court bid to try to overturn election result
Giuliani reveals Trump campaign is filing new Supreme Court bid to try to overturn election result
The campaign suggested the latest lawsuit would be followed by ‘action out of Georgia’
Justin Vallejo
December 29, 2020
The Trump campaign has filed a new legal challenge in the US Supreme Court seeking to overturn election results in Wisconsin.
The move was announced by campaign lawyer Rudy Giuliani, who said the filing was aimed at the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s decision to reject their claims against more than 50,000 ballots. Joe Biden won Wisconsin by a margin of about 20,000 votes.
The Trump campaign says its petition will present claims that ballots were counted by voters without identification, incomplete absentee ballots were counted, and ballots were collected by hand at events held before the election.
It is the Trump campaign’s second filing in the Supreme Court after its challenge to the Pennsylvania election results on 20 December.
They also filed a motion for expedited consideration before the 6 January count of Electoral College votes that delivered the White House to president-elect Biden.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court tossed out the Trump campaign’s lawsuit on 14 December in a 4-3 ruling, with Justice Brian Hagedorn writing that the campaign waited too long to raise its concerns.
“Our laws allow the challenge flag to be thrown regarding various aspects of election administration,” Justice Hagedorn wrote. “The challenges raised by the Campaign in this case, however, come long after the last play or even the last game; the Campaign is challenging the rulebook adopted before the season began.”
Trump campaign adviser Boris Epshteyn said on an episode of Steve Bannon’s podcast that the filing came after a Wisconsin Supreme Court decision that was based on “technicality not the merits”, and that it would be followed by “action out of Georgia.”
“We are now taking that fight to the Supreme Court where there’s already a robust case out of Pennsylvania, and there’s a case out of Arizona,” he said. “There’s going to be action out of Georgia as well.”
While the Supreme Court took up a petition from the Trump campaign challenging election results in Pennsylvania, they set the date for the state’s response for 22 January – two days after Mr Biden is inaugurated as president.
The Supreme Court, meanwhile, threw out the legal challenge filed by Texas, and supported by the president, against election resutls in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin saying that the state did not have standing to bring the case.
Trump Campaign Takes Wisconsin Constitutional Fight to US Supreme Court — Challenging 50,000 Illegal Absentee Votes
Trump Campaign Takes Wisconsin Constitutional Fight to US Supreme Court — Challenging 50,000 Illegal Absentee Votes
By Jim Hoft
December 29, 2020
The Trump campaign on Tuesday took its Wisconsin Constitutional fight to the US Supreme Court.
Trump advisor Boris Epshteyn broke the news today on Steve Bannon’s War Room.
Boris Epshteyn tweeted out the news earlier this afternoon.
The Trump campaign is challenging the 50,000 illegal absentee votes that were allowed to be counted in the state.
Here is the press release:
Will Wisconsin Officially Move Their Electoral College Votes to President Trump After 200,000 Mostly Biden Votes Were Ruled Illegitimate?
Will Wisconsin Officially Move Their Electoral College Votes to President Trump After 200,000 Mostly Biden Votes Were Ruled Illegitimate?
By Joe Hoft
December 29, 2020
We reported a couple weeks ago that the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that over 200,000 [likely mostly] Biden votes were ruled illegitimate.
This clearly places this state in President Trump’s column. Will this be reflected on January 6th?
We reported a couple weeks ago that the Wisconsin Supreme Court agreed with the President’s position on indefinitely confined cases.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled in favor of Mark Jefferson and the Republican Party of Wisconsin.
But the court noted that a determination must be make in every case before tossing a ballot, as President Trump has sought in a separate lawsuit.
Under Wisconsin law, a voter may receive a ballot by mail and bypass Wisconsin’s voter ID law, if the voter, by his own determination, concludes he “confined” based on age, physical illness, or infirmity. This fall, roughly 215,000 voters in Wisconsin said they were indefinitely confined, nearly a four-fold increase from the 2016 election.
The court said the government’s interpretation of Wisconsin’s indefinitely confined was erroneous. “A county clerk may not “declare” that any elector is indefinitely confined due to a pandemic,” the court said. The court further stated that, “…the presence of a communicable disease such as COVID-19, in and of itself, does not entitle all electors [voters] in Wisconsin to obtain an absentee ballot…”
Moreover, the court stated that lockdown orders do not meet the requirements under Wisconsin law to allow a voter to claim the status of “indefinitely confined” either.
There are 240,000 indefinitely confined cases in Wisconsin this year. Most are illegitimate and these were unquestionably votes for Joe Biden.
A judge has agreed that these votes are illegitimate. Republicans should eliminate every one until the Democrats can prove any of them are legitimate.
Will the Republican leadership stand up and disqualify these votes and assign all their electoral votes to President Trump and will these be included in VP Pence’s decision next week when recognizing who won the 2020 election?
In Pennsylvania, a certified public accountant is claiming that the number of ballots is 202,377 bigger than the number of people who actually voted
PA Republican lawmakers: Analysis finds presidential election numbers don’t add up
December 28, 2020
HARRISBURG, Pa. (WJAC) — A group of Republican lawmakers say they’ve performed an extensive analysis of election day data and they’ve found “troubling” discrepancies.
According to State Rep. Frank Ryan (R-Lebanon), 17 lawmakers sponsored and participated in the analysis.
Ryan, who is a certified public accountant, says they discovered discrepancies between the numbers of total votes counted and total number of voters who voted in the 2020 General Election which is making them question how the results could have been certified by Gov. Tom Wolf and Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar.
According to Ryan, the analysis compared official county election results to the total number of voters who voted Nov. 3, as rec
Ryan says they found that 6,962,607 total ballots were reported as being cast, while DoS/SURE system records indicated that only 6,760,230 total voters actually voted.
Among the 6,962,607 total ballots cast, 6,931,060 total votes were counted in the presidential race, including all three candidates on the ballot and write-in candidates, according to Ryan.
He says the difference of 202,377 more votes cast than voters voting, together with the 31,547 over- and under-votes in the presidential race, adds up to a discrepancy of 170,830 votes, which is more than twice the reported statewide difference between Donald Trump and Joe Biden.
Pennsylvania’s election results were certified Nov. 24 and Gov. Wolf issued a certificate of ascertainment of presidential electors stating that Biden received 80,555 more votes than Trump.
The group of lawmakers released the following joint statement:
“We were already concerned with the actions of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the Executive branch, and election officials in certain counties contravening and undermining the Pennsylvania Election Code by eliminating signature verification, postmarks, and due dates while allowing the proliferation of drop boxes with questionable security measures and the unauthorized curing of ballots, as well as the questionable treatment of poll watchers, all of which created wholesale opportunities for irregularities in the 2020 presidential election.”
“However, we are now seeing discrepancies on the retail level which raise even more troubling questions regarding irregularities in the election returns. These findings call into question the accuracy of the SURE system, consistency in the application of the Pennsylvania Election Code from county to county, and the competency of those charged with oversight of elections in our Commonwealth.
“These numbers just don’t add up, and the alleged certification of Pennsylvania’s presidential election results was absolutely premature, unconfirmed, and in error.”
State Rep. Frank Ryan (R-Lebanon) indicated that state legislators sponsoring and participating in the analysis were himself and Reps. Russ Diamond (R-Lebanon), Dave Zimmerman (R-Lancaster), Barb Gleim (R-Cumberland), Stephanie Borowicz (R-Centre/Clinton), Dan Moul (R-Adams), Paul Schemel (R-Franklin), Dawn Keefer (R-York/Cumberland), Eric Nelson (R-Westmoreland), Mike Jones (R-York), Rob Kauffman (R-Franklin), David Maloney (R-Berks), David Rowe (R-Snyder/Union), Kathy Rapp (R-Warren/Crawford/Forest), Daryl Metcalfe (R-Butler), Jim Cox (R-Berks/Lancaster) and Brett Miller (R-Lancaster).
The Pennsylvania Department of State released the following statement in response to the Republicans’ claims:
“In today’s release Rep. Ryan and others rehash, with the same lack of evidence and the same absence of supporting documentation, repeatedly debunked conspiracy theories regarding the November 3 election. State and federal judges have sifted through hundreds of pages of unsubstantiated and false allegations and found no evidence of fraud or illegal voting.
“Now, the legislators have given us another perfect example of the dangers of uninformed, lay analysis combined with a basic lack of election administration knowledge.
“For instance, it is quite common to have significant “undervotes” for down-ballot races in a presidential election, particularly when there isn’t a U.S. Senate race on the ballot. In 2000, Sen. Santorum received 200,000 more votes than President Bush, but the US Senate race still had more than 100,000 fewer votes than the presidential race.
“We are unclear as to what data the legislators used for this most recent “analysis.” But the only way to determine the number of voters who voted in November from the SURE system is through the vote histories. At this time, there are still a few counties that have not completed uploading their vote histories to the SURE system. These counties, which include Philadelphia, Allegheny, Butler and Cambria, would account for a significant number of voters. The numbers certified by the counties, not the uploading of voter histories into the SURE system, determines the ultimate certification of an election by the secretary.
“This obvious misinformation put forth by Rep. Ryan and others is the hallmark of so many of the claims made about this year’s presidential election. When exposed to even the simplest examination, courts at every level have found these and similar conspiratorial claims to be wholly without basis.
“To put it simply, this so-called analysis was based on incomplete data.”
A black rapper invited a white woman on stage to sing one of his songs. Then he got mad at her because his own song included a racial slur.
https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-44209141
Kendrick Lamar stops white fan using N-word on stage at concert
May 22, 2018
A white woman has been booed at a Kendrick Lamar gig for singing the N-word on stage.
The rapper invited the woman, who identified herself only as “Delaney”, to sing M.A.A.D City during his set at the Hangout Festival in Alabama.
But Kendrick stopped her after she repeatedly used the N-word – which is heard multiple times in his song.
As the crowd reacted angrily, Kendrick told her: “You gotta bleep one single word.”
She appeared not to realise why she had been stopped, and asked: “Am I not cool enough for you, bro?”
The crowd in Gulf Shores, Alabama started booing on hearing the woman sing the racial slur.
She apologised, saying: “Oh I’m sorry, did I do it?”
Kendrick then asked the audience if she should be given another try – and despite many shouting “No!”, Kendrick allowed her a second run at the song.
“Every person can say what they want, there’s freedom of speech, but you have a responsibility,” South
London grime artist Yizzy tells BBC News.
“If you use the word… and you’re not of any black heritage, in this modern day world, be prepared to face a backlash.”
Journalist and blogger Jessica Noah Morley adds: “If you don’t want people to sing an offensive word, it should not be sung or included in the song in the first place.
“We, myself included, have to be careful about being hypocritical and implementing a double standard when it comes to race relations. The N-word is, and will always be, offensive, no matter who says it.”
Twitter user @alsostephenking said that Kendrick had been looking for fans who could rap along to his song M.A.A.D City – and that several people had been on stage before Delaney.
Rohan was one of them. He rapped the whole song to cheers from the crowd and omitted the N-word throughout.
https://twitter.com/Rghoshy/status/998759933117173761
The reaction to the response from Kendrick and the crowd has been mixed.
Some people said that expecting Delaney not to sing Kendrick’s own lyrics back to him was unfair.
Kendrick Lamar stops his concert because the girl that he brought on stage to sing HIS song says all the lyrics & because she’s white she’s not supposed to say the N word that’s in the song? Kendrick can take the L for that. Don’t use the word if you don’t want ur fans saying it.
— Versace Stoner (@JoeVargas) May 21, 2018
https://twitter.com/IAmBenAnderson/status/998704054049091584
https://twitter.com/IAmBenAnderson/status/998704054049091584
However others agreed with Kendrick’s decision to cut her off.
Honestly how did that girl at the Kendrick Lamar show think it was okay to use the N word? Even after he told her not to she was still gonna say it. I’m glad he cut her off after that.
— JJ (@caseyrebel13) May 22, 2018
Kendrick Lamar was headlining the final day of the Hangout Festival.
In April, he became the first non-jazz or classical musician to win a Pulitzer Prize for Music for his 2017 album DAMN.
April 19, 2020: “Costco will require all shoppers to wear face masks inside stores.” December 24, 2020: “COVID-19 outbreak at Yakima-area Costco leads to at least 68 staff testing positive.”
April 19, 2020:
“Costco will require all shoppers to wear face masks inside stores”
Source: https://www.today.com/food/costco-requires-all-shoppers-wear-face-masks-inside-stores-t180196
December 24, 2020:
“COVID-19 outbreak at Yakima-area Costco leads to at least 68 staff testing positive”
A new study claims that the lockdown is destroying 10 times as many Quality Adjusted Life Years as it is saving
https://macdonaldlaurier.ca/files/pdf/20201209_Rethinking_lockdowns_Joffe_COMMENTARY_FWeb.pdf
Yet we also need to consider the costs of lockdown. According to the Ca-nadian Medical Association President’s letter, “The strength of the economy should not come at the expense of Canadians’ lives” (Collins 2020). An opin-ion piece by the Scientific Advisory Group on COVID-19 lead in Alberta wrote that a “circuit-breaker” lockdown would “strike a balance between the need to save lives and to limit the impact on our economy” and “no one wants to sacrifice our elderly or kill the economy” (Saxinger 2020). Unfortunately, this frame of the trade-offs demonstrates a misunderstanding, a false dichotomy. We must consider the benefit and cost using a common metric. We are com-paring COVID-19 deaths vs. economic recession deaths, lives versus lives, as the economy is not simply about wealth, but about lives.
Government spending on health care, education, roads, sanitation, housing, nutrition, vaccines, safety, social security nets, clean energy, and other ser-vices determine the population well-being and life-expectancy. Government spending on all of these things, and not just on health care, have a strong historical long-run relation with life expectancy. If the public system is forced to spend less on our future, there are statistical lives lost; people will die in the years to come. Similarly, decisions about what resources to apply to main-tain public health from government services (e.g., treatment of cancer, heart disease, etc.) are based on research regarding how much health and life these expenditures can buy.
The lockdowns caused an economic recession in Canada and for much of the world. Canada’s Chief Medical Officer of Health Theresa Tam wrote that “the extensive slowdown in the Canadian economy [was] as a result of public health emergency measures” (Chief Public Health Officer of Canada 2020). The severity of mandated lockdowns was directly linked with the severity of the economic collapse; these were direct commands to halt work, restrict travel, restrict the number of people inside dwellings, close factory floors, stay at home, etc. A minimum cost calculation of the recession’s effect on reducing government spending on the determinants of population wellbe-ing and lifespan is this: (at least US$50 trillion GDP loss globally) X (around 40 percent of GDP from government expenditures) ÷ (less than US$80,000/QALY) is equal to or greater than 250 million QALY lost in the years to come. Already the cost-benefit balance comes out about 10 times against lockdowns (see Table 1).
You would think elections officials would want an investigation because it would exonerate them. But they don’t. What are they hiding?
https://amgreatness.com/2020/12/26/mccarthy-misses-the-point-in-the-michigan-election-audit/
You would think elections officials would want an investigation because it would exonerate them. But they don’t. What are they hiding?
By Bart Marcois
December 26, 2020
Why the Fear of a Forensic Audit?
There’s a very easy way to resolve all of this. It’s what all of the Trump and Republican lawsuits have been requesting since November 4. We need full forensic audits of all the machines used in the six metropolitan areas where counting was stopped and ballots were dumped. We also need a full bipartisan examination of the paper ballots and machine reports of those votes.
Every American should want to know that our voting system is secure. But the Democrats, the elected officials who approved the voting machine contracts and who conducted the questionable ballot counts, and the owners of Dominion voting systems and other voting machines have fought furiously to prevent it.
“What are they so afraid of?” Ramsland asked. ”What is this fanatical effort to avoid real audit or transparency?”
We would never allow a publicly traded security to go without a third-party audit, substituting that with a ‘trust us, these are the numbers’ approach,” he added. “Why are we to accept this in our most sacred right to vote and have it recorded accurately? And clearly, the public is now awakening to the fact the voting system, and the people in charge of safeguarding it, cannot be trusted without audit and transparency.”
Why won’t Democrats just allow audits? You would think it’s in their collective interest to prove that their hands are clean and that the elections were clean. You would think that they would want an investigation because it would exonerate them. But they don’t. What are they hiding?
And why have the media neglected to ask these questions?
Dan from Squirrel Hill's Blog 