Poll: Can you tell which one of these two women is Chelsea Clinton, and which one is Rebecca Hubbell?
By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)
April 27, 2018
One of the two women pictured below is Chelsea Clinton. The other one is Rebecca Hubbell, daughter of Webster Hubble, who was Hillary Clinton’s law partner in the late 1970s. Chelsea was born in 1980. I’m not sure which picture is Chelsea and which is Rebecca. (I got the image from https://i.imgur.com/ouVbBvy.jpg )
Note from Daniel Alman: If you like this blog post that I wrote, you can buy my books from amazon, and/or donate to me via PayPal, using the links below:
It’s time to see if Democrats are serious about their alleged support for campaign finance laws
We always hear Democrats talking about how they want to pass new campaign finance laws.
So I’m curious to see if these same Democrats will want to enforce the campaign finance laws that are already on the books.
Hillary Clinton committed $84 million in campaign finance law violations. So far, not a angle Democrat has called for her to be prosecuted.
By comparison, the Obama administration sent Dinesh D’Souza (who had previously made an anti-Obama film) to prison for a $20,000 campaign finance law violation. D’Souza did indeed break the law, and the law did indeed call for such a prison term. He was not innocent. He really was guilty.
Clinton’s campaign finance law violation is far bigger than D’Souza’s. In fact, it’s the biggest campaign finance law violation of all time.
Will Democrats call for Clinton to be prosecuted? Or is their claimed support for campaign finance laws just an act of virtue signaling?
Bryan Sharpe, a black conservative, explains why he guilted Starbucks into giving him free coffee
This guy is brilliant and hilarious!
In this video, a black guy tells a white Starbucks employee that the company is giving free coffee to black people as reparations. The employee says it’s true – and that she had read it on her Twitter the previous evening. After the black guy gets his free coffee, he gives it away to a stranger:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-HrbZ3cpwg
It turns out that the black guy is a conservative named Bryan Sharpe. He says he did what he did to make fun of liberals. He also says that liberals only give voice to blacks who are liberal. I guess that’s why he was interviewed by Fox News, and no other TV network.
Here are his exact words:
“I am sick and tired of liberals using black people and making us look like victims, making us look soft with their liberal dogma. It is disgusting. The other thing I hate about liberals is, if you are a black man as I am, in America, they will not hand you a microphone unless you follow the liberal narrative. And I said, you know what, I bet if I go into Starbucks and I follow a liberal narrative, I’ll make the news. And voilà, here I am.”
Skip to 0:48 in this video of his interview with Laura Ingraham on Fox News to hear him say those words:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uom5-aTvCY
The reason Facebook said Diamond and Silk were “unsafe” is because Facebook is run by social justice warriors who demanded “safe spaces” when they were in college
According to this article from the Washington Post, Facebook recently sent the following message to Diamond and Silk: (the bolding is mine)
“The Policy team has came to the conclusion that your content and your brand has been determined unsafe to the community… This decision is final and it is not appeal-able in any way.”
The same Washington Post article went on to say:
“Facebook has not explained what, if anything, the sisters have done to violate its terms of service or be considered ‘unsafe’… their videos are not violent or especially incendiary.”
When regular people use the word “unsafe,” they are referring to things that are physically dangerous, such as falling off a 500 foot cliff and landing on the jagged rocks below, or riding a motorcycle at 200 mph without a helmet, or getting one’s arms chopped off by a maniac with a machete.
But Facebook is not run by regular people.
Facebook is run by social justice warriors who – when they were in college just a few years ago – demanded “safe spaces.” But these “safe spaces” that they demanded had nothing whatsoever to do with physical safety. Instead, they wanted to be “protected” from ideas that did not conform to their own social justice warrior beliefs.
And that is why Facebook labeled Diamond and Silk as being “unsafe.”
Audio recording outtake shows Casey Kasem getting angry and using profanity
In this 79 second recording, Casey Kasem gets upset in response to his coworkers’ repeated refusal to honor his request to not schedule sad long distance dedications directly after an upbeat song:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDYK2H0ldbo
This has got to be the most appropriate and justified use of profanity that I’ve ever heard. Casey was really moved by the death of that dog, and his point about the dedication being preceded by an uptempo song is excellent.
Here’s the dead dog dedication as it was actually broadcast on American Top 40 on September 14, 1985. Skip to 26:19
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEG9pP8NGx0
Mark Keith Robinson gives a brilliant speech in defense of law abiding gun owners
Mark Keith Robinson is a law abiding citizen who lives in Greensboro, North Carolina. In front of his city council, he recently gave this four minute speech defending law abiding gun owners.
This is one of the best arguments in favor of law abiding gun owners that I have ever heard.
Please show this to everyone you know, and help make it go viral!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsu6CIZkthc
Leave It to Beaver scene shows Beaver holding real guns
The video below is from the first season of Leave It to Beaver. The episode is called “Party Invitation.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1XZ8A0oBGI
Woman who is allergic to grass could get 20 years in prison for not having grass in her yard
Janice Duffner lives in St. Peters, Missouri, where she owns a house. Because she is allergic to grass, she does not have any in her yard. She does have other plants, which she is not allergic to. The Kansas City Star published this photograph of her yard:
Six years after Ms. Duffner bought her house, the city passed a law that requires all houses to have grass in their yard. After Ms. Duffner told the city that she was allergic to grass, the city threatened her with 20 years in prison and fines totaling $180,000 if she does not comply.
U.S. District Judge John A. Ross recently ruled against Ms. Duffner. Ms. Duffner plans to appeal this ruling. I hope she wins.
Dan from Squirrel Hill's Blog 
