I recently found these three hilarious images on the internet
I did not create these images.
I do not know who did create them, so I cannot give credit to their creators. I am including links to show where I got them from.
https://i.redd.it/9m5hi78dkyi41.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/FIhlEwh.jpg
https://i.redd.it/fiw5auk0jyi41.jpg
Washington Post gives Hillary Clinton four Pinocchios for saying “… in Wisconsin, where the best studies that have been done said somewhere between 40 and 80,000 people were turned away from the polls because of the color of their skin…”
Hillary Clinton is not a stupid person.
However, much of the audience that she targets is stupid, which is why she recently, knowingly said the following lie:
“I was the first person who ran for president without the protection of the Voting Rights Act, and I will tell you, it makes a really big difference. And it doesn’t just make a difference in Alabama and Georgia; it made a difference in Wisconsin, where the best studies that have been done said somewhere between 40 [thousand] and 80,000 people were turned away from the polls because of the color of their skin, because of their age, because of whatever excuse could be made up to stop a fellow American citizen from voting.”
The Washington Post gave her four Pinocchios – its worst possible rating – for her statement.
Who would be stupid enough to believe such a ridiculous lie?
The same people who were stupid enough to believe that Jussie Smollett (or anyone, for that matter) would leave a noose around his neck for 45 minutes.
What Clinton, Smollett. and the many, many, many people who commit fake hate crimes (you can see a whole bunch of fake hate crimes documented here) are showing to the rest of the country is that the demand for racism, homophobia, etc., in the United States greatly exceeds the supply.
And that demand is not coming from Republicans, conservatives, or libertarians.
Instead, this massive demand for racism, homophobia, etc., is coming from liberals, progressives, social justice warriors, and others on the political left.
To normal people, it’s considered a good thing when people are happy and get along with each other.
But not to the social justice warriors.
To the social justice warriors, the worst possible thing that could ever happen is for people to be happy and get along with each other.
Which is why the social justice warriors are constantly making up so many fake hate crimes.
Ralph Northam must be the guy in blackface, because the other guy looks EXACTLY like Robert Byrd
Ralph Northam is the Democratic governor of Virginia. The media has recently reported that he is one of the two people in this photo from the 1984 yearbook from Eastern Virginia Medical School. Northam has kept silent as to which one is him, and no one in the media has been able to figure it out. (Image sourced from here.)
But it’s obvious to me that Northam is the guy in blackface, because the other guy looks exactly like Robert Byrd, who was a Democratic U.S. Senator from the state of West Virginia.
According to this article from the Washington Post, before Byrd was a U.S. Senator, he started his own chapter of the Ku Klux Klan, and recruited 150 of his friends and associates to join it.
As we all know, the Ku Klux Klan was started by Democrats who were upset that Republican President Abraham Lincoln had forced them to free their slaves.
So when Byrd decided to run as a U.S. Senator, he knew that he had to run as a Democrat.
Byrd died in 2010, when he was still in office. If he were still alive and healthy today, he would still be in office.
Here’s a video of Democrat Hilary Clinton referring to Ku Klux Klan member Robert Byrd as “my friend and mentor.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryweuBVJMEA
And here’s video of the Democrats at CNN falsely claiming that Northam is a Republican. Skip to 0:13
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAXmGjtSBAM
Poll: Can you tell which one of these two women is Chelsea Clinton, and which one is Rebecca Hubbell?
By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)
April 27, 2018
One of the two women pictured below is Chelsea Clinton. The other one is Rebecca Hubbell, daughter of Webster Hubble, who was Hillary Clinton’s law partner in the late 1970s. Chelsea was born in 1980. I’m not sure which picture is Chelsea and which is Rebecca. (I got the image from https://i.imgur.com/ouVbBvy.jpg )
Note from Daniel Alman: If you like this blog post that I wrote, you can buy my books from amazon, and/or donate to me via PayPal, using the links below:
It’s time to see if Democrats are serious about their alleged support for campaign finance laws
We always hear Democrats talking about how they want to pass new campaign finance laws.
So I’m curious to see if these same Democrats will want to enforce the campaign finance laws that are already on the books.
Hillary Clinton committed $84 million in campaign finance law violations. So far, not a angle Democrat has called for her to be prosecuted.
By comparison, the Obama administration sent Dinesh D’Souza (who had previously made an anti-Obama film) to prison for a $20,000 campaign finance law violation. D’Souza did indeed break the law, and the law did indeed call for such a prison term. He was not innocent. He really was guilty.
Clinton’s campaign finance law violation is far bigger than D’Souza’s. In fact, it’s the biggest campaign finance law violation of all time.
Will Democrats call for Clinton to be prosecuted? Or is their claimed support for campaign finance laws just an act of virtue signaling?
Hillary Clinton is still seriously ill
This is new footage of Hillary Clinton in India. When she falls for the second time, she has two people supporting her, and yet she still can’t stay up.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbp3yne4h_4
This footage from June 2016 shows her possibly having a seizure. After the alleged seizure, she seems to deliberately have a second one to try to cover up the real one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtU5nMbEsQ4
In this footage from September 2016, some people say she “fainted,” while others claim she was fully conscious, but the nerves that send signals from her brain to her muscles were not working properly. Her body seems rigid, not at all like someone who has fainted. The secret service agents don’t seem surprised by this – it seems as if they were accustomed to it happening. Clinton herself said she had seasonal allergies, but later said it was pneumonia, but then an hour later she went to play with her grandchildren, which no one who truly had pneumonia would ever do.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnbDZXoA78k
And then two hours later, in this video, she looked completely “recovered” from “pneumonia,” which is not possible. So it wasn’t really pneumonia that caused her to collapse. It was something else – possibly a neurological disorder.
Also, some people have said the blue lenses on her glasses are anti-seizure lenses.
And no one who truly has “pneumonia” would play with their grandchildren.
Skip to 0:18
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kTVmbDUNW8
Hillary Clinton chose to shield a top adviser accused of harassment in 2008
Hillary Clinton Chose to Shield a Top Adviser Accused of Harassment in 2008
January 26, 2018
WASHINGTON — A senior adviser to Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign who was accused of repeatedly sexually harassing a young subordinate was kept on the campaign at Mrs. Clinton’s request, according to four people familiar with what took place.
Mrs. Clinton’s campaign manager at the time recommended that she fire the adviser, Burns Strider. But Mrs. Clinton did not. Instead, Mr. Strider was docked several weeks of pay and ordered to undergo counseling, and the young woman was moved to a new job.
The complaint against Mr. Strider was made by a 30-year-old woman who shared an office with him. She told a campaign official that Mr. Strider had rubbed her shoulders inappropriately, kissed her on the forehead and sent her a string of suggestive emails, including at least one during the night, according to three former campaign officials familiar with what took place.
The complaint was taken to Ms. Doyle, the campaign manager, who approached Mrs. Clinton and urged that Mr. Strider, who was married at the time, be fired, according to the officials familiar with what took place. Mrs. Clinton said she did not want to, and instead he remained on her staff.
Hillary Clinton and hundreds of college students switch from anger to silence when they find out that a hate crime of assault and racial slurs by whites against blacks was fake, and that the assaults had actually been committed by blacks against whites
By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)
June 19, 2017
At the University of Albany, three black students claimed that they were the victims of phsyical assault and racial slurs.
However, forensic evidence (twelve different security cameras – some with audio) proved that they had been lying. There was no hate crime. It was all fake. In addition, it turned out that all three of the black “victims” had themselves committed assault against whites.
When Hillary Clinton had thought this was a real hate crime by whites against blacks, she – justifiably so – criticized the people who had allegedly committed it, saying “There’s no excuse for racism and violence on a college campus.” But now that forensic evidence has proven that it was a fake hate crime, Clinton refuses to criticize the black people who carried out the hoax, despite the fact that these black people were filmed on video committing assault against whites.
Likewise, the hundreds of hypocrite social justice warriors who had – justifiably so – gotten mad and protested when they had thought it was a real hate crime, are now being silent now that it has been proven that it was a fake hate crime, again, despite the fact that the black hoaxers were filmed on video committing assault against white people.
And as far as the black people who committed this fake hate crime? They are getting zero time in jail, despite the fact that all three of them had committed assault against white people.
There is a huge double standard going on here.
Note from Daniel Alman: If you like this blog post that I wrote, you can buy my books from amazon, and/or donate to me via PayPal, using the links below:
This image proves that 2017 women’s march organizer Linda Sarsour wants the U.S. to adopt Sharia law
I have created the following image, which proves that 2017 women’s march organizer Linda Sarsour wants the U.S. to adopt Sharia law:
Video shows anti-Trump protestors planning to shutdown D.C. metro, highways, and bridges
Three days before Trump’s inauguration, this video was released by Project Veritas on the veritasvisuals YouTube channel:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIjbkYLI1nY
This undercover video shows anti-Trump protestors planning to release dangerous butyric acid
This is what wikipedia says about the dangerous butyric acid that anti-Trump protestors were planning to release:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butyric_acid
Butyric acid
Inhalation of butyric acid may result in soreness of throat, coughing, a burning sensation, and laboured breathing. Ingestion of the acid may result in abdominal pain, shock, and collapse. Physical exposure to the acid may result in pain, blistering and skin burns, while exposure to the eyes may result in pain, severe deep burns and loss of vision.
Personal protective equipment such as rubber or PVC gloves, protective eye goggles, and chemical-resistant clothing and shoes are used to minimize risks when handling butyric acid.
Wow. That’s majorly serious harm that the anti-Trump protestors were planning to cause to innocent human beings.
My guess is that the release of this video four days before Trump’s inauguration is the only thing that prevented this dangerous and harmful attack against innocent people from taking place.
This undercover video by Project Veritas was published on the veritasvisuals YouTube channel four days before Trump’s inauguration:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHZSfhd1X_8
Thank goodness for the electoral college, which prevented Hillary Clinton from starting World War III
Hillary Clinton admitted in 2013 that a no-fly zone would “kill a lot of Syrians” — but still wants one
A no-fly zone in Syria could lead to a U.S. war with Russia — but Hillary Clinton keeps on calling for one
October 21, 2016
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton continues to call for a no-fly zone in Syria, insisting it would save lives. Yet, just three years ago, she acknowledged in a private paid speech to Goldman Sachs that a no-fly zone would “kill a lot of Syrians” and lead to “American and NATO involvement where you take a lot of civilians.”
In numerous presidential debates, Clinton has proposed creating a no-fly zone or so-called safe zones in Syria, areas in which planes piloted by the Syrian government or by its Russian allies could not operate. If planes were to fly in these zones, they would be shot down.
Clinton repeated her call for a no-fly zone in the final presidential debate on Wednesday night. “I’m going to continue to push for a no-fly zone and safe havens within Syria,” she said, adding that it would be “not only to help protect the Syrians and prevent the constant outflow of refugees, but to, frankly, gain some leverage on both the Syrian government and the Russians.”
What Clinton did not acknowledge is that a no-fly zone would likely lead to war with Russia — the world’s largest nuclear power.
Chris Wallace, the moderator for the debate, alluded to this in a follow-up question. He noted that, while Clinton has called for no-fly zones in multiple debates, Gen. Joseph Dunford, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has warned that imposing a no-fly zone could potentially kick off a war with Russia.
Moreover, “President Obama has refused to do that because he fears it’s going to draw us closer or deeper into the conflict,” Wallace added. “How do you respond to their concerns?” he asked. “If you impose a no-fly zone and a Russian plane violates that, does President Clinton shoot that plane down?”
Clinton conceded that she is “well aware of the really legitimate concerns that you have expressed from both the president and the general,” yet avoided directly answering the question, doubling down on her policy. Instead of identifying a no-fly zone as a military strategy, she spoke of it as a diplomatic one, claiming, “I think a no-fly zone could save lives and could hasten the end of the conflict.”
This argument, however, is undermined by what Clinton herself privately acknowledged just three years ago. An excerpt of a June 2013 paid speech Clinton delivered to Goldman Sachs, recently released by the WikiLeaks, shows that Clinton is well aware of how dangerous a no-fly zone could be.
“To have a no-fly zone you have to take out all of the air defense, many of which are located in populated areas,” the former secretary of state explained in the 2013 speech. “So our missiles, even if they are standoff missiles so we’re not putting our pilots at risk — you’re going to kill a lot of Syrians.”
“So all of a sudden this intervention that people talk about so glibly becomes an American and NATO involvement where you take a lot of civilians,” she added.
Clinton also noted that Syria had “the fourth-biggest army in the world,” along with “very sophisticated air defense systems” that had gotten even more sophisticated because of Russian imports.
The quotes from this speech were included in a list of excerpts of Clinton’s paid speeches to Wall Street, which was attached to a January 2016 email to John Podesta, a close Clinton ally who now serves as the chair for Clinton’s presidential campaign. WikiLeaks has published thousands of emails to and from Podesta.
In the same 2013 Goldman Sachs speech included in this document, Clinton pointed out that a no-fly zone in Syria would be different from the no-fly zone that was imposed in Libya in 2011, which ultimately led to the violent overthrow of the government.
“The air defenses were not that sophisticated” in Libya, she said. Clinton also noted that there would be many more civilian casualties in Syria than there had been in Libya.
“And then you add on to it [that] a lot of the air defenses are not only in civilian population centers but near some of their chemical stockpiles,” Clinton added, referencing Syria. “You do not want a missile hitting a chemical stockpile.”
The no-fly zone imposed in Libya paved the way for the toppling, and brutal killing, of former leader Muammar Qadhafi. The U.N. Security Council first established the zone ostensibly to protect civilians, yet it quickly led to a NATO bombing campaign.
In fact, every time a no-fly zone has been imposed, it has led to regime change.
Micah Zenko, a fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, used NATO’s own materials to show that, despite the humanitarian rhetoric behind the call for a no-fly zone in Libya, Western governments planned to pursue regime change in the oil-rich North African country from the very beginning.
A September 2016 report by the U.K. House of Commons’ Foreign Affairs Committee also detailed how the war in Libya was based on an array of lies.
Final newspaper endorsement count: Clinton 57, Trump 2
Final newspaper endorsement count: Clinton 57, Trump 2
November 6, 2016
Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has received fewer endorsements from the editorial boards of the nation’s largest newspapers than any major-party presidential candidate in history.
Among the top 100 largest newspapers in America, just two — the Las Vegas Review-Journal and the Florida Times-Union in Jacksonville — endorsed Trump. The Review-Journal is owned by Sheldon Adelson, the casino magnate who has spent millions trying to elect Trump.
“Donald Trump, despite all of his faults, is best suited to blow up the inbred corruption of the Washington-New York elites,” the Times-Union wrote in a Sunday editorial.
Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton has received endorsements from 57 newspaper editorial boards across the country, including papers such as the Dallas Morning News, the Arizona Republic and the San Diego Union-Tribune, conservative bastions that have almost always backed Republicans.
Four newspapers have taken the unusual step of explicitly advising readers to vote against Trump, even if they cannot bring themselves to recommend Clinton.
Trump’s “reckless ignorance is more informed by disturbing Internet conspiracy theories than evidence, wisdom or reason,” the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel wrote this weekend. Clinton “suffers from an inflated sense of entitlement and a well-earned lack of trust.”
But, the paper concluded: “Job One: Reject Trump.”
USA Today, the Ft. Worth Star-Telegram and Salt Lake City’s Deseret News all advised votes against the Republican presidential nominee.
The rejection of Trump is even more lopsided than the 1972 presidential contest, when the vast majority of papers backed Richard Nixon’s reelection bid. Only 7 percent of papers that endorsed that year picked George McGovern, the Democratic nominee. This year, only 3 percent of papers are backing Trump.
Even Libertarian Party nominee Gary Johnson has had more success with editorial boards than Trump. This weekend, the Charleston Post & Courier became the fourth paper to back Johnson.
“No, Mr. Johnson won’t win the White House Tuesday. But if he gains a substantial vote total, that could help spark the liberation of our politics from the two-party monopoly now failing Americans,” the paper wrote.
Hillary supporter Jonathan Pie gives a brilliant explanation for why she lost the election (six minute video)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLG9g7BcjKs
Video shows Hillary supporters praising her actions in Benghazi, her plan to repeal the Bill of Rights, and her plan to adopt Sharia law in the U.S., as well as criticizing people who hunt endangered Triceratops
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSs7rbXqQgQ
Jill Stein leaves Clinton supporter speechless (four minute video)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8z6n0Lz_dI
Hillary sending John Podesta to speak for her at 2 a.m. on election night reinforces my belief that she has Parkinson’s
At 2 a.m. on election night, Hillary stayed home, and sent John Podesta to speak in her place.
Has any other major party presidential candidate in modern times ever done something like this?
The medication that Hillary takes to prevent her Parkinson’s tremors only lasts for a short period of time, which is why her campaign appearances were so limited.
What other reason could there possibly be for her absence?
This video explains why her recent public appearances have always been so limited:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mf0TDm8hBHY
Donald Trump wins the presidency after Hillary Clinton cheated Bernie Sanders
This guy is a Bernie Sanders supporter who voted for Jill Stein. In this awesome video, he explains why Hillary is worse than Trump:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kr6Bk6x0xRY
Donald Trump, not Hillary Clinton, is the real Occupy Wall St. candidate
This article from Reuters shows that Wall St. loves Hillary, not Trump. It says:
Employees of the 17 largest bank holding companies and their subsidiaries have been sending her $10 for every $1 they contributed to Trump, according to a Reuters analysis.
In addition, Goldman Sachs paid Hillary a combined total of $675,000 for three speeches.
Also, While Senator, Hillary voted for the $700 billion TARP Wall St. corporate welfare bank bailout bill.
And finally, as last night’s election results came in, Salon published this article, which is called “Global markets plunge as prospect of Trump winning the presidency becomes more plausible.”
I really don’t see how anyone who voted for Hillary can honestly say they support the Occupy Wall St. movement.
Dan from Squirrel Hill's Blog 
