April 19, 2020: “Costco will require all shoppers to wear face masks inside stores.” December 24, 2020: “COVID-19 outbreak at Yakima-area Costco leads to at least 68 staff testing positive.”
April 19, 2020:
“Costco will require all shoppers to wear face masks inside stores”
Source: https://www.today.com/food/costco-requires-all-shoppers-wear-face-masks-inside-stores-t180196
December 24, 2020:
“COVID-19 outbreak at Yakima-area Costco leads to at least 68 staff testing positive”
A new study claims that the lockdown is destroying 10 times as many Quality Adjusted Life Years as it is saving
https://macdonaldlaurier.ca/files/pdf/20201209_Rethinking_lockdowns_Joffe_COMMENTARY_FWeb.pdf
Yet we also need to consider the costs of lockdown. According to the Ca-nadian Medical Association President’s letter, “The strength of the economy should not come at the expense of Canadians’ lives” (Collins 2020). An opin-ion piece by the Scientific Advisory Group on COVID-19 lead in Alberta wrote that a “circuit-breaker” lockdown would “strike a balance between the need to save lives and to limit the impact on our economy” and “no one wants to sacrifice our elderly or kill the economy” (Saxinger 2020). Unfortunately, this frame of the trade-offs demonstrates a misunderstanding, a false dichotomy. We must consider the benefit and cost using a common metric. We are com-paring COVID-19 deaths vs. economic recession deaths, lives versus lives, as the economy is not simply about wealth, but about lives.
Government spending on health care, education, roads, sanitation, housing, nutrition, vaccines, safety, social security nets, clean energy, and other ser-vices determine the population well-being and life-expectancy. Government spending on all of these things, and not just on health care, have a strong historical long-run relation with life expectancy. If the public system is forced to spend less on our future, there are statistical lives lost; people will die in the years to come. Similarly, decisions about what resources to apply to main-tain public health from government services (e.g., treatment of cancer, heart disease, etc.) are based on research regarding how much health and life these expenditures can buy.
The lockdowns caused an economic recession in Canada and for much of the world. Canada’s Chief Medical Officer of Health Theresa Tam wrote that “the extensive slowdown in the Canadian economy [was] as a result of public health emergency measures” (Chief Public Health Officer of Canada 2020). The severity of mandated lockdowns was directly linked with the severity of the economic collapse; these were direct commands to halt work, restrict travel, restrict the number of people inside dwellings, close factory floors, stay at home, etc. A minimum cost calculation of the recession’s effect on reducing government spending on the determinants of population wellbe-ing and lifespan is this: (at least US$50 trillion GDP loss globally) X (around 40 percent of GDP from government expenditures) ÷ (less than US$80,000/QALY) is equal to or greater than 250 million QALY lost in the years to come. Already the cost-benefit balance comes out about 10 times against lockdowns (see Table 1).
You would think elections officials would want an investigation because it would exonerate them. But they don’t. What are they hiding?
https://amgreatness.com/2020/12/26/mccarthy-misses-the-point-in-the-michigan-election-audit/
You would think elections officials would want an investigation because it would exonerate them. But they don’t. What are they hiding?
By Bart Marcois
December 26, 2020
Why the Fear of a Forensic Audit?
There’s a very easy way to resolve all of this. It’s what all of the Trump and Republican lawsuits have been requesting since November 4. We need full forensic audits of all the machines used in the six metropolitan areas where counting was stopped and ballots were dumped. We also need a full bipartisan examination of the paper ballots and machine reports of those votes.
Every American should want to know that our voting system is secure. But the Democrats, the elected officials who approved the voting machine contracts and who conducted the questionable ballot counts, and the owners of Dominion voting systems and other voting machines have fought furiously to prevent it.
“What are they so afraid of?” Ramsland asked. ”What is this fanatical effort to avoid real audit or transparency?”
We would never allow a publicly traded security to go without a third-party audit, substituting that with a ‘trust us, these are the numbers’ approach,” he added. “Why are we to accept this in our most sacred right to vote and have it recorded accurately? And clearly, the public is now awakening to the fact the voting system, and the people in charge of safeguarding it, cannot be trusted without audit and transparency.”
Why won’t Democrats just allow audits? You would think it’s in their collective interest to prove that their hands are clean and that the elections were clean. You would think that they would want an investigation because it would exonerate them. But they don’t. What are they hiding?
And why have the media neglected to ask these questions?
Amtrack, the government run passenger rail system, purchases soda for $3.40 per serving, and then resells it to customers for $2.00. Meanwhile, McDonald’s purchases soda for 9 cents per serving, and then resells it to customers for $1.29.
Amtrack, the government run passenger rail system, purchases soda for $3.40 per serving, and then resells it to customers for $2.00. So they are selling it at a loss. The taxpayers make up the difference.
Source: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/amtrak-lost-800m-on-cheeseburgers-and-soda
Meanwhile, McDonald’s purchases soda for 9 cents per serving, and then resells it to customers for $1.29. So they make a profit.
In my opinion, cutting taxes is better than having the government waste the taxpayers’ money.
This is what Democrats mean when they say they are in favor of “ballot harvesting”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4n_5V62LT-Q
VOTER FRAUD ON DISPLAY: Houston Ballots All Have Same Signature and Same Address
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/voter-fraud-display-houston-ballots-signature-address/
VOTER FRAUD ON DISPLAY: Houston Ballots All Have Same Signature and Same Address
By Jim Hoft
December 25, 2020
The voter fraud in this year’s presidential election was widespread and extensive.
Instead of asking where was the fraud? The real question is where was there NO fraud? Democrats used every trick in their book to steal votes and manufacture ballots.
Here is the latest proof of voter fraud in Texas.
Democrats manufactured votes — in the same city, in the same handwriting and at the same address.
This is what Democrats do.
And they will continue to do this until people are sent to jail.
This needs to stop.
WHERE IS THE DOJ? WHERE IS THE FBI?
WHAT HORRIBLE PEOPLE!
https://twitter.com/shot_gangster/status/1342222355913797632
Here are many examples of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election that, as far as I’m aware, have not been debunked
By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)
December 25, 2020
The mainstream media continues to insist that there is “no evidence” of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election.
They are lying.
Here are many examples of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election that, as far as I’m aware, have not been debunked.
Russell James Ramsland, Jr. says his audit of 22 Dominion voting machines that were used in Antrim County, Michigan, is proof that Democrats cheated. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, and Michigan Judge Kevin Elsenheimer tried to prevent the public from seeing the report. They failed. Here’s a link to the report, and my summary of it. Neither Dominion Voting Systems, nor any of its employees, have sued Ramsland for defamation. The mainstream media has not debunked Ramsland’s claims. But they do continue to insist that there is “no evidence” of fraud.
Source: https://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/2020/12/23/russell-james-ramsland-jr/
Some people tested a Dominion voting machine that was used in Ware County, Georgia. They claim that it switched 13% of Trump’s votes to Biden.
Source: https://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/2020/12/25/13-per-cent/
Mainstream media reports that Fulton County, Georgia, “stopped” counting ballots for the night because “a water pipe has broken,” and “sent the ballot counters home.” Video shows Republican poll watchers leaving the building. The same video shows a few people remain, and continue counting votes without Republican poll watchers. Video shows election worker scanning the same ballots three times. There is no visible water leak in these videos. Mainstream media still claims there is no evidence of fraud.
Source: https://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/2020/12/23/georgia/
A study of more than 3,000 U.S. counties shows that, all else being equal, counties that used Dominion voting machines gave Biden an extra 5.6% of the vote, compared to counties that did not use Dominion machines. Since all other factors were taken into account, this is almost certain proof that Democrats cheated.
Source: https://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/2020/12/24/5-point-6-per-cent/
Here’s the C-SPAN video of Trump’s lawyer’s opening statement on voter fraud from the Senate Committee Hearing that was banned by YouTube.
Source: https://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/2020/12/20/heres-trump-lawyers/
Maricopa County, Arizona rejects subpoena to audit voting machines.
Source: https://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/2020/12/19/maricopa-county/
Pennsylvania accepted mail in ballots for 69 hours later than what is allowed by law.
Source: https://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/2020/11/25/pennsylvania-accepted/
In Arizona, Republicans requested an audit of 100 ballots that had been “fixed” by election workers. Democrats tried to block the audit. The audit happened. It showed that election workers had cheated by altering the votes to give Biden a net gain of 3 votes out of the 100.
Source: https://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/2020/12/25/in-arizona-republicans/
In several states, vote counting was paused late at night. Later, when counting resumed, there were giant vote spikes with impossibly high percentages for Biden. These things only happened in the states where Democrats needed to flip the state from Trump to Biden. They did not happen in other states.
Source: https://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/2020/12/25/in-several-states/
DeKalb County, Georgia is illegally refusing to honor an Open Records Request to show the documents for the chain of custody for the absentee ballots that were submitted in drop boxes.
Source: https://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/2020/12/05/dekalb-county/
An audit of 1,400 mail-in ballots in Nevada found that 2% were cast by voters who never actually received a ballot in the mail, and 1% were cast by voters who say they didn’t even vote.
Source: https://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/2020/12/25/1400/
In Michigan, Federal Judge Linda Parker won’t let victims of voter fraud testify in court. Fraudsters used absentee ballots to vote under these people’s names. Why is Judge Parker afraid to let the public hear their testimony?
Source: https://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/2020/12/07/in-michigan/
It has been claimed that out of the 900 absentee military ballots in Fulton County, Georgia, Biden received 100% of the vote.
Source: https://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/2020/11/28/page-79/
What a computer expert said about voting results in Michigan.
Source: https://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/2020/11/20/what-a-computer/
Tens of thousands of ballots arrived before their sent date in Pennsylvania.
Source: https://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/2020/11/10/tens-of-thousands/
In Antrim County, Michigan, human actions and/or a software “error” gave thousands of Trump votes to Biden.
Source: https://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/2020/11/07/antrim-county/
Wisconsin illegally refused to remove 234,000 names from the voting rolls even though they had moved out of the state or to a different city within the state. All of these people had ignored a written notification that had been mailed to their old address. Wisconsin made it very easy for all of these 234,000 names to be used for fraudulent voting, because the state allowed every single person in the state to declare themself as “indefinitely confined,” which allowed them to vote by absentee ballot, which allowed them to ignore the state’s voter ID law. In 2019, only 72,000 voters in the state were “indefinitely confined.” In 2020, this number more than tripled. The state illegally kept the Green Party candidate off the ballot. The city of Madison placed illegal drop boxes in the city’s 206 parks. These illegal drop boxes were not supervised. City employees “helped” voters to fill out their ballots before placing them into these illegal drop boxes. The city of Milwaukee withheld reporting its vote totals until after it knew how many votes Biden would need to win.
Source: https://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/2020/11/05/how-the-wisconsin/
Dominion took over Georgia voting machines remotely during 2020 election
Source: https://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/2020/12/08/dominion-took-over/
In several states, vote counting was paused late at night. Later, when counting resumed, there were giant vote spikes with impossibly high percentages for Biden. These things only happened in the states where Democrats needed to flip the state from Trump to Biden. They did not happen in other states.
By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)
December 25, 2020
In the states where no cheating is suspected, Biden’s percentage of the mail in vote remains consistent among different batches within the same state. If one batch of mail in votes in one state went 70% for Biden, then all the other batches of mail in votes in that same state also went 70% for Biden.
But not in the critical swing states.
In the critical swing states, after they stopped counting votes in the middle of the night, and then resumed counting later on, the percentage of mail in votes for Biden was way, way higher than it was in earlier batches within that same state.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1329543841217540096.html
2020 Election: Could Trump’s claims have merit?
An analysis of voting data from Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.
Data Source: New York Times and Edison Research.
November 19, 2020
METHODS
Before diving in to the specific data, I wanted to provide samples of the graphs I have put together to show examples of states with clear victories for each of the candidates. These graphs make it easier to notice anomalies in other states.
Let’s start with Minnesota.
Votes after election day should be randomly sampled votes received by mail and the percentage of votes for a specific candidate should stay roughly constant. Here you can see Biden received roughly 54% of all votes after election day.
TRUMP WIN
Here is Florida.
Here there is a gradual slant where Biden goes from receiving around 50% of the votes to receiving around 48%, but there is no gap in reporting and it stays consistent until the counting is complete.
SWING STATES IN QUESTION
For this analysis I am going to be focusing specifically on four states: Wisconsin, Georgia, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. All four of these states have some things in common.
WISCONSIN
I have highlighted one of the Bubbles orange and added an orange arrow to illustrate how abnormal this batch is. This batch contained nearly 170,000 votes and 85% of them went to Biden, but Biden’s largest margins were 75.5% in Dane county and 70% in Milwaukee.
WISCONSIN
When you chart the percentage of votes counted as the x axis you can get an idea of how many votes were already counted at this point. The answer is 96.6%. Why did counting stop around 97% and then two hours later this massive influx of new Biden votes came in?
MICHIGAN
Similar to Wisconsin, vote counting stopped during the night, and then a huge batch of votes came in. 96% of the votes went to Biden and he netted around 141,000 votes. A 96% batch of votes seems improbable because Biden’s top county in Michigan was won by 72%.
MICHIGAN
From this point on, the percentage of votes coming in for Biden shifted too (see the orange arrow). Also, like Wisconsin, this batch came in after most of the votes had already been counted (85% in this case).
GEORGIA
Similarly in Georgia, a huge batch came in in the middle of the night mostly for Biden (the vertical blue spike around 1AM corresponding to the orange bubble). Another oddity, after election night every batch of votes favored Biden (no bubbles bottom of chart).
GEORGIA
At 1 AM on election night, 93% of the votes were already counted, and then the big Biden spike of votes came in. Over the next 2 days, the percentage of votes in each batch skewed more and more towards Biden for the final 5% of votes.
PENNSYLVANIA
Pennsylvania also had a stop in counting along with a big batch of votes going to Biden in the middle of the night and then a gradual shift of the returned votes towards Biden until 3 days later when he was declared the winner.
PENNSYLVANIA
It is certainly interesting that as soon as Pennsylvania stopped counting (at around 78% of the votes), the remaining votes shifted progressively in Biden’s favor similar to Georgia. From 45% to 50.5%. I am not sure how this can be explained naturally.
ALL FOUR STATES
Stopped counting votes on the night of the election
Had vote surges for Biden in the middle of the night
Had shifts in the percentage of votes being counted towards Biden after the election and after 90% or more of the votes had already been counted
MAIL-IN BALLOTS
If the mail-in ballots counted post-election were mostly for Biden he would have received over 50% of counted votes in these batches, but that was not the case until *after* the counting was stopped. This is suspicious to me.
CONCLUSION
The odds of all four states exhibiting similar strange behaviors and shifts in how many votes were counted for Biden over time seem improbable if this was not somehow coordinated.
In Arizona, Republicans requested an audit of 100 ballots that had been “fixed” by election workers. Democrats tried to block the audit. The audit happened. It showed that election workers had cheated by altering the votes to give Biden a net gain of 3 votes out of the 100.
By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)
December 25, 2020
Republicans demanded this audit of 100 ballots in Arizona. These particular ballots had to be “fixed” by election workers because they had been rejected during machine scanning.
The Democrats later demanded that they – and they alone – be allowed to examine these “fixed” ballots. They also demanded that this info be withheld from the public. The judge said no to both of those demands.
https://twitter.com/AZGOP/status/1334165432161374209
According to this article from Associated Press, out of the 100 “fixed” ballots, one vote for Trump was changed to a vote for Biden. Also, a different vote for Trump was spoiled when the election worker added a write in vote.
2,500 ballots to be inspected in suit by Arizona GOP chief
By JACQUES BILLEAUD
December 2, 2020
PHOENIX (AP) — County election officials agreed Wednesday to expand their inspection of certain ballots in metro Phoenix that are being challenged in a Republican lawsuit that seeks to reverse Joe Biden’s victory in the state.
Arizona Republican Party Chairwoman Kelli Ward, who filed a lawsuit contesting the election results, is looking for irregularities among the nearly 28,000 ballots in Maricopa County that were duplicated by elections officials because voters’ earlier ballots were damaged or couldn’t be tabulated. She requested a broader examination of the ballots after a court-ordered inspection of 100 duplicated ballots on Tuesday found two instances in which votes cast for Trump were cancelled in the duplication process.
Before the judge could rule on Ward’s request at a court hearing, the county offered to review 2,500 additional duplicated ballots.
“We put on a great election on Nov. 3, and we are happy to have people look more closely at it,” said Tom Liddy, a lawyer representing county officials. “We have nothing to hide.”
Ward’s lawyers say the inspection of 100 ballots found that one person’s vote for Trump was ultimately recorded as a Biden vote and that another person’s vote for Trump was cancelled when the reproduced ballot contained votes for both the Republican incumbent and a write-in candidate.
Bruce Spiva, a lawyer for the 11 Biden electors in Arizona who were sued by Ward, questioned whether the error rate for duplicated ballots would be so high that it could plausibly change how the state voted in the presidential race.
Roopali Desai, an attorney representing Democratic Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, said Ward’s lawsuit is a “fishing expedition” that doesn’t make any claims of pervasive fraud or intentional misconduct.
A trial has been scheduled for Thursday in Ward’s lawsuit.
The state’s election results were certified on Monday, showing Biden won Arizona by more than 10,000 votes. The Electoral College is scheduled to meet on Dec. 14.
No evidence of voter fraud or election fraud has emerged during this election season in Arizona. U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr has said the Justice Department has uncovered no evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the election.
Even though Republican Gov. Doug Ducey said earlier this week that Arizona’s election was well-run as he certified the Nov. 3 results, many GOP politicians in the state have mostly been silent or slow to express confidence in the election results that gave Biden a victory in Arizona.
Ward’s lawsuit claims some suburbs on the southeastern edge of Maricopa County had an unusually high number of duplicated ballots — and that the election results in that area were “strongly inconsistent” with voter registration and historical voting data. Hobbs’ office has said there were 104 duplicated ballots cast in the area in question.
Four earlier election challenges in Maricopa County were dismissed, including one filed by the Arizona Republican Party that sought to determine whether voting machines were hacked.
A new election challenge filed Wednesday by Trump’s electors in Arizona alleges that there were more than 400,000 illegal ballots counted in the state and criticizes the voting equipment used in metro Phoenix. The lawsuit was filed by firebrand conservative attorney Sidney Powell, who was removed from Trump’s legal team.
An audit of 1,400 mail-in ballots in Nevada found that 2% were cast by voters who never actually received a ballot in the mail, and 1% were cast by voters who say they didn’t even vote.
Trump Legal Team: We Have ‘So Much Evidence’ of Fraud in Nevada ‘We Had to Rent a Separate Car’
By Matt Margolis
December3, 2020
An audit of 1,400 mail-in ballots in Nevada found that two percent were cast by voters who never actually received a ballot in the mail, and one percent were cast by voters who say they didn’t even vote.
The audit, which was conducted by Baselice and Associates for the Trump campaign’s legal team in Nevada, found that 579,000 absentee ballots were returned to the state by Election Day. If three percent of those ballots were improperly cast, that comes to 17,300 illegal votes.
The Trump campaign was also granted the right to inspect voting machine used during the election, though they’ve yet to be granted a proper inspection.
“Machines were not usable, and we were not able to make a determination about the accuracy and integrity of the election process based on this inspection,” Trump’s legal team said. “We are entitled to a computer forensic inspection in accordance with the judge’s order. We were prevented from doing one. This was a digital election and we were not allowed a digital inspection. The ‘inspection’ today was like trying to determine if a car had failed brakes without getting underneath the car.”
The Trump campaign alleges that 130,000 ballots from Clark County were verified using a machine they believe was not operated properly. They’ve long held the belief that President Trump is the true winner in Nevada. The Silver State has six electoral votes.
A hearing is to be held in Carson City, Nevada, on Thursday. “We have so much evidence we had to rent a separate car,” says Matt Schlapp, chairman of the American Conservative Union, who’s with the Trump legal team in the state.
On Wednesday, Schlapp also said that “The numbers of illegal ballots in NV from outside Nevada has now doubled” from his original assessment of just 9,000.
Some people tested a Dominion voting machine that was used in Ware County, Georgia. They claim that it switched 13% of Trump’s votes to Biden.
By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)
December 25, 2020
Some people tested a Dominion voting machine that was used in Ware County, Georgia.
They claim that it switched 13% of Trump’s votes to Biden.
December 6, 2020
https://twitter.com/aaronjcarpenter/status/1335634648798523395
The big news you need to hear about today is Ware County, Georgia. Dominion machines were seized.
Equal number of Trump and Biden votes were forensically analyzed.
However, the machines reported 87% for Trump and 113% for Biden. Should be 100% for both.
Stay tuned. This is big.
Miami, Florida affiliate of ABC on the new COVID-19 vaccine: “To protect fertility, some men may want to consider freezing their sperm prior to vaccination.”
WPLG, also known as Local 10, is a Miami, Florida affiliate of ABC.
Their website recently reported the following about the new COVID-19 vaccine:
“To protect fertility, some men may want to consider freezing their sperm prior to vaccination.”
This is not some fringe, alternative, or conspiracy website. This is ABC News – the mainstream media.
I’ve seen both the U.K. and U.S. versions of the fictional TV series Utopia. So I know all about the conspiracies of a manufactured global pandemic, where the vaccine is deliberately designed to sterilize the human population.
But those shows are supposed to be fiction.
Rudy Giuliani: “Starting After Christmas This Is Really Going to Blow Up”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/rudy-giuliani-going-find-going-shocking-country/
Rudy Giuliani: “Starting After Christmas This Is Really Going to Blow Up”
By Joe Hoft
December 25, 2020
Christmas is not cancelled. We all know President Trump won the 2020 election. Rudy Giuliani offers his thoughts to date.
Rudy Giuliani in his most recent ‘Common Sense’ discussion shared the following:
You’re going to find out all at once. It’s going to be very shocking to the country.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FkvvtuVsyUA
The people at “WeLoveTrump.com” share this about the current state of the 2020 Presidential race:
We’ve been telling you for weeks.
Let’s put 2 + 2 together.
The White House has instructed Trump staff to STOP packing…
The Pentagon has stopped giving Joe Biden intelligence briefings…
More Republican representatives are on the record claiming they will contest the electoral votes…
Dan Scavino has been posting increasingly cryptic messages on Twitter…
And Kamala Harris STILL hasn’t left her Senate seat!
Now, Rudy Giuliani has given an explanation on the voter fraud:
“You’re going to find out all at once. It’s going to be very shocking to the country.”
There is hope. We must continue to fight and pray for Trump and our country. President Trump crushed Joe Biden in the 2020 election.
A study of more than 3,000 U.S. counties shows that, all else being equal, counties that used Dominion voting machines gave Biden an extra 5.6% of the vote, compared to counties that did not use Dominion machines. Since all other factors were taken into account, this is almost certain proof that Democrats cheated.
By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)
December 24, 2020
A study looked at the 2020 election results in more than 3,000 U.S. counties, and compared them to the predicted results based on past elections.
In the counties that did not use Dominion voting machines, the average vote percentages for Joe Biden in 2020 were exactly what was predicted. Some were higher, and some were lower, but it all averaged out to being exactly what was predicted.
But in the counties that used Dominion machines, the average results in 2020 gave Joe Biden an extra 5.6% of the votes, compared to what was predicted.
All other factors were taken into account.
Given the large sample size, this is extremely unlikely to happen if these vote counts were honest.
This is almost certain proof of cheating.
No one has debunked this study.
The mainstream media has completely ignored it, and continues to insist that there is “no evidence” of voter fraud.
Here’s an article about it, which includes several very interesting charts and graphs. After that are some videos on it.
Fraud with Dominion machines would look exactly like they do… here’s the data, graphs, Biden will not get away with this.
December 18, 2020
An unbiased by-county analysis of over 3000 U.S. counties shows Joe Biden received 5.6 % more votes in counties using Dominion Voting Systems. “If a network system of computers was used to fraudulently affect vote counts…the results would look exactly like this.”
This Dominion advantage was observed regardless of the county’s majority political party affiliation nor urban, suburban, or rural-area demographics. Biden over-performed our estimates in “democratic strongholds” – by the same amount he over-performed in “Trump” counties.
The analysis is not directed at a single or handful of counties. Instead, this information uses data from all counties in the United States to see if there is a discernable widespread pattern involving type of voting machine and vote totals.
In the first graph, we see Biden’s actual 2020 election results. The blue line is our center “prediction” line. Half the counties should be above the blue line & half below. This is confirmed true with Biden over-performing in 45% of counties & underperforming in 55%.
We obtained data from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission showing the voting machines used by each county. Compare this graph with the same data, except this time limited to counties using Dominion. This time the majority of counties (78%) are ABOVE the prediction line.
The county data filtered by voting machines shows us that candidate Biden over performed by approximately 5% on Dominion machines AND also by approximately 6% on Hart machines.
In the Dominion/Hart machine counties, Biden performs above expectations 78% of the time. This is highly indicative (and 99.9% statistically significant) that result manipulation could be occurring with Dominion & Hart machines.
In this graph, we see green dots represent votes from counties using Dominion/Hart machines. The green dots should overlay the blue dots in a similar, mixed up/random fashion. We do not see this. Instead, we see the green dots centered higher than the center of the blue dots.
To aid in this graphical analysis we added center lines for the Dominion/Hart counties and the “other machine” counties. The green centerline stays above the blue centerline – clearly indicating Biden continuously “outperforming” in Dominion/Hart counties.
The increases in votes occurred in hundreds of Dominion/Hart counties across the U.S. Again, it is important to understand, Biden “over-performed” in “democratic strongholds” – by the same amount he over-performed in “Trump” counties as long as these machines were used.
This indicates that some or all of the Dominion/Hart machines may have been programmed or manipulated to systematically add five plus percentage points to Biden’s actual vote count. Again, the statistical significance level of these results is above 99.9%.
Video: 2020 Election shows Joe Biden over-performs in 72% of counties using Dominion Voting Systems
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCMF-FbgYMA
And in case that YouTube video gets deleted, here’s that same video at a different platform:
Here’s a different video, which includes testimony on this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMD2G_uGwWM
Russell James Ramsland, Jr. says his audit of 22 Dominion voting machines that were used in Antrim County, Michigan, is proof that Democrats cheated. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, and Michigan Judge Kevin Elsenheimer tried to prevent the public from seeing the report. They failed. Here’s a link to the report, and my summary of it. Neither Dominion Voting Systems, nor any of its employees, have sued Ramsland for defamation. The mainstream media has not debunked Ramsland’s claims. But they do continue to insist that there is “no evidence” of fraud.
By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)
December 23, 2020
Russell James Ramsland, Jr. says that he has audited 22 Dominion voting machines that were used in Antrim County, Michigan.
Ramsland says his audit is proof that Democrats cheated.
Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, and Michigan Judge Kevin Elsenheimer all tried to prevent the public from seeing Ramsland’s report on his audit.
They failed.
The report has been made public.
The error rate for these voting machines is not supposed to be above 0.0008%.
But Ramsland says these machines had an error rate of 68.05%.
That’s 85,000 times bigger than the maximum that is considered acceptable.
All of those votes were sent to a human who could change them however they wanted.
The machine keeps a log of these changes.
But Ramsland says someone erased these logs for the 2020 election.
Meanwhile, the logs for previous elections are still there.
Ramsland says the following in the conclusion of his report:
“We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.”
Neither Dominion Voting Systems, nor any of its employees, have sued Ramsland for defamation.
Such a lawsuit, if it were to happen, would include a process known as “discovery,” where all of Ramsland’s claims would be thoroughly investigated. My guess is that Dominion and its employees don’t want that to happen.
The mainstream media has not debunked Ramsland’s claims.
But they do continue to insist that there is “no evidence” of fraud.
You can read Ramsland’s report here:
Mainstream media reports that Fulton County, Georgia, “stopped” counting ballots for the night because “a water pipe has broken,” and “sent the ballot counters home.” Video shows Republican poll watchers leaving the building. The same video shows a few people remain, and continue counting votes without Republican poll watchers. Video shows election worker scanning the same ballots three times. There is no visible water leak in these videos. Mainstream media still claims there is no evidence of fraud.
By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)
December 23, 2020
In this video from election night, CBS News says that Fulton County, Georgia “stopped” counting the absentee ballots for the night because “a water pipe has broken.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C25DAAHZdEw
Around the same time, ABC News reported:
“The election department sent the ballot counters at the State Farm Arena in Atlanta home at 10:30 p.m.”
Original source: https://twitter.com/abcpolitics/status/1323846118208376834
Archived source: https://web.archive.org/web/20201104043502/https://twitter.com/abcpolitics/status/1323846118208376834
Later, this video came out. It shows Republican poll watchers going home for the night, just as they were told to do.
But after the Republican poll watchers go home, a few people remain.
These remaining people then continue counting ballots.
There is no visible sign of any water leak in the video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keANzinHWUA
This video shows one of those election workers scanning the same ballots three times.
This happened after they had “stopped” counting votes for the night, and sent the Republican poll watchers home due to a “water leak.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiREC3Zy20E
President Trump retweeted the video of the election worker scanning the same ballots three times.
Twitter labelled this as
“This claim about election fraud is disputed”
The mainstream media continues to insist that there is “no evidence” of fraud.
Original: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1341551177146757121
President Trump Tweets Gateway Pundit Video Showing Poll Workers Stuffing Ballots Into Tabulators Numerous Times on Election Night
President Trump Tweets Gateway Pundit Video Showing Poll Workers Stuffing Ballots Into Tabulators Numerous Times on Election Night
By Joe Hoft
December 23, 2020
President Trump tweeted a Gateway Pundit video where we identified Georgia ballot workers jamming ballots into tabulators multiple times late on election night.
President Trump just now retweeted our video where we show Georgia poll workers jamming multiple ballots through tabulators multiple times. The video aired on OAN.
We shared this video on December 4, when we pointed out that one of the participants in the ballots under the desk scandal grabbed the ballots and started jamming the ballots into the Dominion tabulators three times.
Georgia’s results are a total fraud.
The Democrats using people like these poll workers stole the election for Joe Biden.
Tens of thousands of ballots in Georgia are fraudulent.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1341551177146757121
379,000 Illegal Ballots Were Cast in Michigan By The Election, 379,000 Illegal Ballots Were Cast in Michigan; Now Have “Receipts” to Prove it
The report can be read here:
https://www.scribd.com/document/488495896/Navarro-Report
379,000 Illegal Ballots Were Cast in Michigan By The Election, 379,000 Illegal Ballots Were Cast in Michigan; Now Have “Receipts” to Prove it
By Pamela Geller
December 21, 2020
By The Election Wiz
December 21, 2020
Last Thursday, Dr. Peter Navarro released an explosive report outlining the fraud in the 2020 election. The report explained how Democrats cheated in the 2020 election in various contested states. Notably however, the report did not include a detailed breakdown of Michigan. At the time of the report, Dr. Narravo explained there was insufficient data to draw estimates of how the various types of irregularities in Michigan translate into possible illegal votes.
This morning, Dr. Navarro joined Steve Bannon’s War Room: Pandemic. During the interview (~48:00 mark), Navarro told Bannon he now has the “receipts” for Michigan. Dr. Navarro explained that Biden’s lead in Michigan is currently alleged to be 154,000 votes.
Dr. told Bannon that figure includes about 174,384 ballots that were cast without proper voter ID verification, another 195,000 of “inexplicable vote surges,” and about 9,5000 confirmed dead voters who cast ballots.
The Narravo Report video
Navarro pointed to the timestamped data from the New York Times. He said on November 4, Trump had taken a substantial lead over Biden during a nine hour period. Navarro said that within “five seconds” at around 6:30 am ET, Biden’s vote total “skyrocketed by 141,258 votes.” Dr. Navarro said that vote surge is over 30 times the expected vote count. “Within that same time frame, do ya know how many Trump got? 5,968 [votes],” Navarro remarked.
Dr. Navarro said there was another suspicious dump at around 3:50 am ET where Biden got over 54,000 votes while Trump only garnered about 4,700 votes.
Dr. Navarro told Bannon these new receipts for Michigan show there was a “coordinated” scheme to stretch or break the law by “stuffing the ballot box.”
A white member of Antifa named Jennifer Lynn Cole has been arrested after a video showed her setting a black owned business on fire in Portland, Oregon.
https://twitter.com/KOINNews/status/1338911235174240269
Radical arsonist torches BLACK restaurant after owner’s brother criticizes Antifa for violence in Portland
December 21, 2020
Thirty-eight-year-old Jennifer Lynn Cole has been arrested and charged with second-degree arson for torching Portland restaurant Reo’s Ribs in retaliation for the owner’s brother criticizing Antifa.
Andy Ngo, a famous reporter who covers Antifa violence, first broke the story on Nov. 28, saying “Reo’s Ribs, a restaurant in Portland, was destroyed in a fire overnight,” Ngo reported. “It is next to the businesses that were vandalized last week by Antifa. The owner gave an interview where he was critical of that vandalism against his neighbors.”
Earlier in December surveillance footage of the crime was released by KOIN News and shared by Ngo in a tweet. The tape shows a female, presumably Cole, starting a small fire near recycling and garbage receptacles which then turns into a massive blaze.
Before the incident occurred, the owner’s brother Ricky Varnado had criticized Antifa and leftist agitators for destroying small businesses across Portland.
“I just hope whoever is doing this, they would catch the people who [are] doing it and be prosecuted for what they’ve done,” Ricky said. “I mean, because this is really a sad time of the year they are doing this, with the coronavirus epidemic that’s going on, people are having a hard time trying to make it in life and this makes it even worse.”
In 2017, Reo’s Ribs was destroyed in another fire which was ruled as an accident. Owner Reo Varnado said at the time the fire wasn’t an accident, citing previous comments made by unknown individuals, some of which reportedly involved race-based pejoratives.
“It makes me think about my past when I was growing up in Mississippi,” the restaurant owner said. “Because I’ve seen it happen so many times back there. It gives me flashbacks.”
The irony of the attack cannot be understated as Reo is himself a black man. This incident points to a wider pattern of behavior by Antifa, a radical organization many members within today’s political establishment continue to ignore.
One thing is for certain, however. Antifa is far from an imaginary boogeyman propagated by the GOP. The proof is in the pudding. The demise of Reo’s business is one of many incidents that have occurred throughout 2020.
Indeed, the United States has failed to come to terms with Antifa, which has consistently shown itself to be a violent, radical, and morally bankrupt political movement designed to do only one thing – utilize fear as a tool to silence opposition of any kind.
According to Rasmussen, 30% of DEMOCRATS think Democrats stole the election
Rasmussen says that 20% of DEMOCRATS think it’s “very likely” that “Democrats stole votes or destroyed pro-Trump ballots in several states to ensure that Biden would win.”
An additional 10% of DEMOCRATS think this is “somewhat likely.”
So 30% of DEMOCRATS think Democrats stole the election.
Original: https://twitter.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1340397848135917571
Russell Ramsland shows election vote switching happening in real-time on CNN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lL-3wY8FjAI
Here’s the C-SPAN video of Trump’s lawyer’s opening statement on voter fraud from the Senate Committee Hearing that was banned by YouTube
The Epoch Times just reported:
YouTube Removes Trump Lawyer’s Opening Statement From Senate Committee Hearing
By Jack Phillips
December 20, 2020
One of President Donald Trump’s lawyers said YouTube removed his opening statement from a Senate Homeland Security hearing on election fraud.
“YouTube has decided that my opening statement in the U.S. [Senate], given under oath and based upon hard evidence, is too dangerous for you to see; they removed it. To this day, ‘our evidence has never been refuted, only ignored.’ Why is Google so afraid of the truth? #BigBrother,” lawyer Jesse Binnall wrote on Twitter.
Earlier this month, YouTube announced that it would remove “content alleging widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of a historical U.S. presidential election.” The Google-owned company said that it would take this action because the “safe harbor” deadline on Dec. 8 in the presidential election had passed.
There are still outstanding legal challenges regarding the Nov. 3 election, while alternative slates of electors voted for Trump during the Dec. 14 meeting of the Electoral College.
“We will remove videos claiming that a presidential candidate won the election due to widespread software glitches or counting errors. We will begin enforcing this policy today, and will ramp up in the weeks to come,” YouTube wrote in the Dec. 9 announcement.
This is exactly why BitChute was created.
Here’s the video from their website.
YouTube Removes Trump Lawyer’s Opening Statement From Senate Committee Hearing
YouTube Removes Trump Lawyer’s Opening Statement From Senate Committee Hearing
By Jack Phillips
December 20, 2020
One of President Donald Trump’s lawyers said YouTube removed his opening statement from a Senate Homeland Security hearing on election fraud.
“YouTube has decided that my opening statement in the U.S. [Senate], given under oath and based upon hard evidence, is too dangerous for you to see; they removed it. To this day, ‘our evidence has never been refuted, only ignored.’ Why is Google so afraid of the truth? #BigBrother,” lawyer Jesse Binnall wrote on Twitter.
Another video of his testimony at the hearing, uploaded on Dec. 17 by a separate account, appeared to still be up.
The Epoch Times reached out to YouTube, a subsidiary of Google, for comment.
https://twitter.com/jbinnall/status/1340495095511052289
Earlier this month, YouTube announced that it would remove “content alleging widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of a historical U.S. presidential election.” The Google-owned company said that it would take this action because the “safe harbor” deadline on Dec. 8 in the presidential election had passed.
There are still outstanding legal challenges regarding the Nov. 3 election, while alternative slates of electors voted for Trump during the Dec. 14 meeting of the Electoral College.
“We will remove videos claiming that a presidential candidate won the election due to widespread software glitches or counting errors. We will begin enforcing this policy today, and will ramp up in the weeks to come,” YouTube wrote in the Dec. 9 announcement.
“As always, news coverage and commentary on these issues can remain on our site if there’s sufficient education, documentary, scientific, or artistic context.”
It didn’t elaborate on the context it requires, and the announcement drew widespread condemnation from conservatives and free-speech advocates. They argued that YouTube’s decision was tantamount to censorship of dissenting views.
During the hearing, Binnall, who filed lawsuits on behalf of Trump in Nevada, said the election was riddled with fraud in the Silver State.
“Thousands upon thousands of Nevada voters had their voices canceled out by election fraud and invalid ballots,” he told senators during the hearing.
“Here is how it happened. On August 3rd, 2020, after a rushed special session, Nevada legislators made drastic changes to the state’s election law by adopting a bill known as AB4,” he said, referring to the state law that relaxed restrictions on mail-in ballots.
Binnall also said that the campaign was denied transparency when it attempted to seek audits of voting machines or ballots.
As they probed the alleged irregularities, Binnall told the hearing that the campaign was refused access by state election officials to the code of voting machines for a forensic review of whether “they were hooked up to the internet.” He asserted, “We weren’t allowed near them. … We weren’t allowed a forensic audit.”
“We were denied [transparency] at every single turn” in Nevada, he said, adding that one Nevada official “locked himself in his office” and wouldn’t open the door when Trump’s lawyers tried to serve him a subpoena.
CBS News: “There was foreign election interference by China, Iran, and Russia in November of this year.” NBC News: “Many government officials” were lying when they said voting machines weren’t connected to the internet.
This December 3, 2020 video from CBS News states:
“There was foreign election interference by China, Iran, and Russia in November of this year.”
Skip to 1:47
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiqemNFIxkc
This January 10, 2020 article from NBC News says that “many government officials” were lying when they said voting machines were not connected to the internet.
Why would voting machines be connected to the internet?
And why would government officials lie about it?
‘Online and vulnerable’: Experts find nearly three dozen U.S. voting systems connected to internet
A team of election security experts used a “Google for servers” to challenge claims that voting machines do not connect to the internet and found some did.
By Kevin Monahan, Cynthia McFadden and Didi Martinez
January 10, 2020
It was an assurance designed to bolster public confidence in the way America votes: Voting machines “are not connected to the internet.”
Then Acting Undersecretary for Cybersecurity and Communications at the Department of Homeland Security Jeanette Manfra said those words in 2017, testifying before Congress while she was responsible for the security of the nation’s voting system.
So many government officials like Manfra have said the same thing over the last few years that it is commonly accepted as gospel by most Americans. Behind it is the notion that if voting systems are not online, hackers will have a harder time compromising them.
But that is an overstatement, according to a team of 10 independent cybersecurity experts who specialize in voting systems and elections. While the voting machines themselves are not designed to be online, the larger voting systems in many states end up there, putting the voting process at risk.
That team of election security experts say that last summer, they discovered some systems are, in fact, online.
“We found over 35 [voting systems] had been left online and we’re still continuing to find more,” Kevin Skoglund, a senior technical advisor at the election security advocacy group National Election Defense Coalition, told NBC News.
“We kept hearing from election officials that voting machines were never on the internet,” he said. “And we knew that wasn’t true. And so we set out to try and find the voting machines to see if we could find them on the internet, and especially the back-end systems that voting machines in the precinct were connecting to to report their results.”
Skoglund and his team developed a tool that scoured the internet to see if the central computers that program voting machines and run the entire election process at the precinct level were online. Once they had identified such systems, they contacted the relevant election officials and also provided the information to reporter Kim Zetter, who published the findings in Vice’s Motherboard in August.
The three largest voting manufacturing companies — Election Systems &Software, Dominion Voting Systems and Hart InterCivic — have acknowledged they all put modems in some of their tabulators and scanners. The reason? So that unofficial election results can more quickly be relayed to the public. Those modems connect to cell phone networks, which, in turn, are connected to the internet.
The largest manufacturer of voting machines, ES&S, told NBC News their systems are protected by firewalls and are not on the “public internet.” But both Skoglund and Andrew Appel, a Princeton computer science professor and expert on elections, said such firewalls can and have been breached.
“AT&T and Verizon and so on try and protect as best they can the security of their phone network from the rest of the internet, but it’s still part of the internet,” Appel explained. “There can still be security holes that allow hackers to get into the phone network.”
The 35 systems Skoglund’s team found represent a fraction of total voting systems nationwide, though he believes they only captured a portion of the systems that are or have been online. Earlier this week, Skoglund showed NBC three election systems were still online even after officials had been told they were vulnerable.
For election systems to be online, even momentarily, presents a serious problem, according to Appel.
“Once a hacker starts talking to the voting machine through the modem, the hacker cannot just change these unofficial election results, they can hack the software in the voting machine and make it cheat in future elections,” he said.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology, which provides cybersecurity frameworks for state and local governments and other organizations, recommends that voting systems should not have wireless network connections.
Skoglund said that they identified only one company among the systems they detected on line, ES&S. ES&S confirmed they had sold scanners with wireless modems to at least 11 states. Skoglund says those include the battleground states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Florida.
While the company’s website states that “zero” of its voting tabulators are connected to the internet, ES&S told NBC News 14,000 of their DS200 tabulators with online modems are currently in use around the country.
NBC News asked the two other major manufacturers how many of their tabulators with modems were currently in use. Hart said that it has approximately 1,600 such tabulators in use in 11 counties in Michigan. Dominion did not respond to numerous requests from NBC News for their sales numbers.
‘Vulnerable to hacking’
With the 2020 presidential election only ten months away, Appel and Skoglund believe all modems can and should be removed from election systems.
“Modems in voting machines are a bad idea,” said Appel. “Those modems that ES&S [and other manufacturers] are putting in their voting machines are network connections, and that leaves them vulnerable to hacking by anybody who can connect to that network.”
The state of Michigan is currently grappling with this issue. Since the 2016 election, Michigan authorized $82 million dollars to upgrade its election systems. Some of that money was spent on tabulators with wireless modems. But now, some state officials worry that the machines may pose a security risk and are pushing to have the modems removed.
Others are not so sure, and the state has set up an advisory committee.
Jake Rollow, director of communications for the Michigan Department of State, said in a statement to NBC News, “Even though the results are unofficial, if these unofficial results were disrupted or manipulated, it could still cause confusion on Election Day.”
“The department will consider the advisory commission’s recommendations to improve the security of the process,” Rollow continued. “The specific steps taken would depend on the recommendation and the timeline required to make changes effectively.”
Last fall, when ES&S gave NBC News an exclusive tour at its headquarters in Omaha, Neb., Chief Executive Officer Tom Burt defended using modems when asked about the Sprint and Verizon modems seen in ES&S’s testing area.
“There’s a small percentage of jurisdictions in the country — a lot of them are in Florida — who have decided they want to modem unofficial results to the election office,” he said. “Generally speaking, the media in those locations are kinda clamoring to get unofficial results as quickly as possible.”
When asked if the desire for speed was at odds with accuracy and security, Burt said, “it’s not my place to judge that.”
NBC News reached out to the Department of Homeland Security, which declined to comment on the topic of modem security in voting machine tabulators and scanners.
‘Inviting trouble’
Critics also argue ES&S has mislead jurisdictions into thinking their DS200 tabulators with modems are certified by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, a claim they say is grounds for an investigation.
In a letter obtained by NBC News sent to the EAC on Tuesday, the nonprofit public interest group Free Speech for People and the National Election Defense Coalition asked the agency to look into whether ES&S violated agency regulations by implying that DS200 voting machines with modems are EAC certified.
“ES&S has repeatedly advertised its DS200 with internal modem — a critical component to ES&S’s voting systems — as being EAC certified when, in fact, it is not,” the letter said. “We therefore again respectfully request that EAC investigate and take action to correct this serious issue.”
“Once you add that modem, you are de-certifying it,” Skoglund said. “It is no longer federally certified. And I don’t know that all these jurisdictions are aware of that because ES&S is advertising otherwise.”
But Skogland points to some good news. He believes there is time to make real change before the 2020 election.
“We should be unplugging all of these machines from the internet,” Skoglund said. “Even for elections nights.”
Appel agreed. “We can not make our computers perfectly secure,” he said. “What we should do is remove all of the unnecessary, hackable pathways, such as modems. We should not connect our voting machines directly to the computer networks. That is just inviting trouble.”
These two tech experts also agree on the path forward, saying they are comforted by the fact that most Americans will vote this year on hand-marked paper ballots which are counted by machine and can be recounted by hand if the situation warrants.
The machines America votes on seem to be capturing the interest of some in Congress. The House Committee on Administration held a congressional hearing yesterday which was the first time the heads of the three major vendors, representing at least 80 percent of U.S. voting machines, appeared together for questioning. While lawmakers questioned them about foreign influence in their supply chains and whether they would comply with more federal reporting requirements, the presence of modems in some of their tabulators was mentioned but not pursued.
