Michigan attorney alleges 1,061 ‘phantom ballots’ found in Antrim County 2020 election case


Michigan attorney alleges 1,061 ‘phantom ballots’ found in Antrim County 2020 election case

May 10, 2021

More than a thousand “phantom ballots” were discovered in Antrim County, Michigan, according to a local attorney in a 2020 election lawsuit alleging fraud in the contest six months after it took place.

Matthew DePerno, who is representing Antrim County resident William Bailey, said a recount in December tallied 15,962 ballots, but only 14,901 votes were shown in the Michigan secretary of state’s database, meaning 1,061 don’t exist on voter rolls.

This alleged discovery of “phantom ballots,” DePerno wrote in a recent filing, supports the need for an audit of the county results. Other irregularities that warrant a closer look, according to DePerno, are data showing a near 100% turnout among voters aged 65 to 80 and 1 in 5 ballots being sent to P.O. boxes.

The Washington Examiner reached out to the Michigan secretary of state’s office for comment on where the data for the “phantom ballots” can be found but did not receive a response.

Former President Donald Trump appears to be keeping up with the latest in the case. He issued a statement about it Monday evening.

“The major Michigan Election Fraud case has just filed a bombshell pleading claiming votes were intentionally switched from President Trump to Joe Biden,” he said in a statement shared by his Save America PAC. “The number of votes is MASSIVE and determinative. This will prove true in numerous other States. All Republicans must UNIFY and not let this happen. If a thief robs a jewelry store of all of its diamonds (the 2020 Presidential Election), the diamonds must be returned. The Fake News media refuses to cover the greatest Election Fraud in the history of our Country. They have lost all credibility, but ultimately, they will have no choice!”

Attorneys made arguments before Antrim County Circuit Judge Kevin Elsenheimer in a virtual hearing on Monday over the scope of the ever-expanding lawsuit and whether to dismiss the case, in which both sides have issued dueling analyses. Defendants, which includes Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, say the plaintiff lacks standing and has already received everything he initially sought from the court. The judge said he will likely make a decision next week.

The results in Antrim County, a Republican-leaning county in northern Michigan, initially showed President Joe Biden winning the race, but tabulation errors were quickly discovered, and once rectified, Trump was shown to be the victor. State and county officials have blamed human error, a failure to properly update software across the county, for the mishap, but Bailey and DePerno contend Dominion Voting Systems machines could have been used to manipulate the election. Dominion has denied claims of being involved in election maleficence and has filed multiple defamation lawsuits since the November election.

A hand recount in Antrim County found a deviation of just a dozen votes from the first tabulation, with 9,759 votes won by Trump and 5,959 going to Biden, who won the state of Michigan and its 16 Electoral College votes by roughly 150,000 ballots. DePerno also raised concerns about two volunteers for the recount that he says were told by a Michigan secretary of state official to count roughly 138 ballots they found with “the very same signature in Central Lake Township.”

May 10, 2021. Tags: , , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Attorney Matthew DePerno Demolishes Defense in Call for Antrim County Election Audit

The Lendberg Report can be read at https://www.depernolaw.com/uploads/2/7/0/2/27029178/ex_1_-_lenberg_report.pdf

Matthew DePerno’s supplemental brief can be read at https://www.depernolaw.com/uploads/2/7/0/2/27029178/supplemental_brief_051021_1_.pdf


Attorney Matthew DePerno Demolishes Defense in Call for Antrim County Election Audit

If The Swamp doesn’t block the Antrim County election audit, it appears to be a potential bombshell domino to topple the steal.

By JD Rucker

May 10, 2021

While hopes are still high in Maricopa County that the current audit will reveal bombshells beyond the obvious lack of transparency and total obstruction by Democrats in performing the audit itself, others are working towards getting their own audits going that can expose the voter fraud that stole the 2020 president election. One such effort is underway in Antrim County, Michigan, where attorney Matthew DePerno dropped some bombshells today before and during court.


The gist of this filling is that they have proof Dominion Voting Systems and their Antrim County Dominion Democracy Suite Election Management System was used to switch votes from Jo Jorgenson to Donald Trump, then from Trump to Joe Biden, then pushed into a the “Undervote” category. As part of their evidence, they were able to easily reproduce the circumstances that correlated with the apparent vote shift.

According to a report compiled by analyst Jeffrey Lendberg, the filing states [emphasis added]:

“The Antrim County Dominion Democracy Suite, Elections Management System (EMS), Results Tallying and Reporting RTR) application has been found to be subverted. Numerous error conditions that are identified by the tabulator are ignored by the EMS/RTR. The error conditions are easily reproduced and displayed on the tabulator, yet the EMS/RTR has been subverted in a fashion to purposefully ignore vote manipulation. This technical behavior is consistent with a subversion being deployed in the Antrim County EMS/RTR and is designed to mute such error reporting. This subversion technique is common among malicious actors seeking to proactively handle error conditions that would jeopardize their ability to modify software’s performance.”

In layman’s terms, they switched off the alarms that would have alerted observers and future auditors of funny business. It’s like the vote-count version of the movie trope where they freeze a CCTV camera so someone can sneak by without the guard eating a donate and watching soccer in the control room doesn’t notice what’s going on. Here’s the complete Lendberg report filed today:

DePerno also filed a supplemental brief that detailed the implications of the voter fraud and why the court must allow the election audit to move forward as quickly as possible. In the brief, DePerno noted:

“It is important to note that this subversion affected every single race on the entire ballot, from Presidential election, through Michigan Supreme Court election, and continuing to the bottom of the ticket and the local school board races and Proposals 20-1 and 20-2. Every race was subverted.”

DePerno hammered the defense today as they tried to subvert discovery of subversion. The video of the hearing has been going viral as in it we hear DePerno detail what was filed with the court and lays waste to arguments that the audit would be too expensive or there’s no reason to have it at all. The judge was a hard read, though. We’ve seen throughout the entire ordeal that judges seem unsympathetic to the cause of stopping voter fraud. It has gotten to the point that some conspiracy theorists (and that’s not a phrase I use as a pejorative) believe these judges have been bribed, bullied, or blackmailed.

Here’s the video of DePerno in action:



Earlier, DePerno was interviewed twice (and we have reached out through Twitter to see if we can interview him as well. Here’ we hear him on Dark to Light with Frank & Beanz:

Today, Steve Bannon had DePerno on War Room:

According to The Gateway Pundit:

DePerno explains that in the December hand recount of Antrim county, there was a total of 15,952 ballots counted; however, Secretary of State Benson’s official database only had 14,901 ballots which means there exists 1,061 extra ballots not on the voter rolls, i.e., “phantom” ballots.

Phantom ballots could explain what happened at the hand recount in December when volunteers were told to count approximately 138 ballots with the very same signature. Despite their repeated objections and attempts to challenge the problem ballots, the Secretary of State official said, “That’s not your role at this very moment” and pushed the volunteers to count the ballots and finish the audit.

Kyle Becker at Becker News gave detailed analysis of what’s happening in Antrim County:

A joint motion requesting Judge Kevin Elsenheimer dismiss the lawsuit has been filed by Assistant Michigan Attorney General Erik Grill , who represents intervener Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, and attorney Haider Kazim, who is representing defendant Antrim County.

The joint motion seeks to have the lawsuit dismissed for lack of standing. The judge has already allowed the complainant, Bailey and his attorney, Matthew DePerno, to have a third party conduct a forensic examination of the county’s Dominion Voting Systems equipment. That audit was conducted earlier by Allied Security Operations Group, a Dallas-based firm that concluded the voting machine equipment was fraught with errors.

“The Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results,” the audit report stated. “The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified…”

Antrim County had been the site of a detected error that flipped votes from Donald Trump to Joe Biden. The error was detected and corrected before the 2020 election results could be certified.

“Bailey continues to argue the county violated his constitutional rights after an error by County Clerk Sheryl Guy caused about 2,000 votes cast for then-President Donald Trump, to be initially — and mistakenly — tallied for then-challenger Joe Biden,” the Traverse Eagle reported.

“Guy, a Republican, corrected her office’s vote tally errors prior to the state’s certification of the county’s November election results, and records show Trump won Antrim County by a large margin, receiving 9,748 votes to Biden’s 5,960 votes,” the report continued.

Matthew DePerno has also requested election data from other counties, which the judge rejected as a “fishing expedition.” DePerno filed another motion on May 4 seeking to add Antrim County Clerk Sheryl Guy, state Bureau of Elections Director Jonathan Brater, and Election Source, a Dominion subcontractor, to the lawsuit as defendants, the report continued.

Meanwhile, a forensic audit of Antrim County has now been proposed and will be under discussion at a meeting in June.

“In the more than seven hour meeting, commissioners also discussed whether they have the authority to conduct their own audit, forensic accounting or hand recount of the county’s 2020 election results,” the Traverse Eagle noted. “They don’t — state law says only the Secretary of State can conduct and audit elections in Michigan.”

There are only two real possibilities based on the evidence that has been seen so far in Antrim County. Either the judge suppresses everything on behalf of The Swamp or the audit goes forward and the truth finally comes out.

May 10, 2021. Tags: , , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Michigan Election Fraud Is Clear: Filed Court Documents Expose Changed Votes


Michigan Election Fraud Is Clear: Filed Court Documents Expose Changed Votes

By Bly Tubman

May 10, 2021

This court case devoted to exposing the fraud in the 2020 election in Michigan is getting WILD and we are so here for it.

Attorney Matthew DePerno and his team deserve some kind of medal– or screw it, just give them the Nobel Peace Prize already.

MassRoundup brought you an article not too long ago highlighting the groundbreaking analysis done by Attorney DePerno’s expert, Douglas Frank, who explained exactly how the electronic voting in Michigan was rigged to fit a perfect algorithm in all of the voting districts he evaluated at that point in time. He has surmised that if permitted to analyze the entire state, his findings would be accurate in every single county. Bold statement, Doug. But, that’s how friggin’ sure they are that something is clearly wrong here.

And, they brought the goods to back it up.

Today, Attorney DePerno filed court documents and argued the findings in court while the Government is working to suppress the information and get the case thrown out. Six lawyers versus one– a David and Goliath moment, if you will– and David aka DePerno is CRUSHING IT.

In the filings from today, Attorney DePerno called out Dominion in a BIG way, by exposing how votes were changed from Jo Jorgensen to Donald Trump to Joe Biden. How could this happen and no one notice? Great question. Attorney DePerno and his team found the answer. Dominion deactivated the part of the system that would send out alerts for such activity that would have required someone to look into the rigging that was going on.

Nothing to see here. Just like in Arizona where the Dominion guys were actually running the voting show, holding onto the software passwords, and bringing laptops in and out of ‘secure’ rooms where votes were being monitored. While there’s a huge push to keep this stuff quiet from the Left, far too much is happening and some people are really catching on. FINALLY!

Nothing to see here is quickly becoming everything to see here. The claims about the “Big Lie” being a Trump fantasy lose luster every single day. And, THANK GOD for that. Let’s go!

May 10, 2021. Tags: , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

If There’s Nothing to Hide, Why Are Democrats Freaking Out about the Arizona Audit?


If There’s Nothing to Hide, Why Are Democrats Freaking Out about the Arizona Audit?

By J.B. Shurk

May 9, 2021

If you have been keeping an eye on the election audit taking place right now in Maricopa County, Arizona, then you also know that Democrats, news propagandists, and “concerned” NeverTrump Republicans are beginning to sound more and more like trapped rats squeaking in fear.  An army of lawyers — many of the same political operatives who manipulated the November election by contravening existing election laws and flooding battleground states with uncontrolled and unverified mail-in ballots — are begging state and federal courts to stop the audit midcourse and petitioning Arizona’s Democrat secretary of state and Merrick Garland’s Department of Justice to intervene under the absurd pretense that ensuring election integrity somehow deprives voters of their civil rights.  Arizonan and Biden-supporter Cindy McCain has publicly called the vote recount “ludicrous” because “the election is over.”  And MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow is so terrified of what the auditors might find that she insists that the whole exercise is not only “dangerous,” but also the “end of democracy.”

Even though the entire audit is being conducted with unprecedented transparency and live video feeds that invite viewers anywhere in the world to watch the process, reporters and adverse political agents have been repeatedly caught attempting to infiltrate the well run operation or laboring to expose the identities of workers.  If there is a reason for inserting spies into an already open process other than to later cast doubt upon the integrity of the auditing process itself, I don’t know of it.  And if there is a reason to expose workers’ identities to the public other than to make them targets for campaigns of harassment and intimidation, reporters have made no attempt to provide it.

Compare the highly professional audit taking place in Arizona to the orchestrated chaos of the presidential election.  It took five days last November for vote-counters to find enough mail-in ballots for Joe Biden for the Democrat press corps to declare him the winner, and in the voting precincts where Trump leads disappeared over those days, transparency was nowhere to be seen.  Vote-counters covered windows with cardboard to block outside observation of any kind; counting paused and restarted in secret; and ad hoc procedures were established on the fly and without consistency from one precinct to the next when determining whether to include ballots lacking legally required voter identification metrics, including even the rudimentary safety protocol of a loosely matching voter signature.  If “free and fair” elections require basic security, verification of ballot authenticity, and consistently applied standards at least across the precincts and counties of any one state, then there was obviously nothing free or fair about the 2020 election.

The remarkable thing is that most Americans have actually come to this correct conclusion.  After six months of some of the worst gaslighting in America’s history, during which corporate news propagandists and tech behemoths have colluded with federal and state authorities to paint the presidential election as aboveboard and all those who question its legitimacy as kooks, “extremists,” “violent insurrectionists,” and “terrorists,” the nearly universal narrative drumbeat from the press and the psychological warfare deployed against regular Americans have failed miserably in their desired effect.  Whether spray-painted on highway overpasses, discussed in uncensored online forums, or spoken aloud, more and more Americans have concluded that the election was stolen from President Trump.

State legislatures were useless in ensuring election integrity.  Election lawsuits in Arizona, New Mexico, Georgia, New Hampshire, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin failed to provide any timely mechanism for remedying violations of states’ own election laws, let alone for redressing the likelihood of outright fraud.  The Supreme Court shirked its own constitutional duty to safeguard American enfranchisement by declining to hear on appeal the merits of lawsuits alleging electoral misconduct, consenting to review controversies only after Biden’s inauguration and then largely booting them as moot, and outright refusing to exercise its original jurisdiction over Texas’s suit against other states for their failure to ensure equal application of their own voting laws as required by the Constitution.

At every step of the way, America’s institutions utterly failed to safeguard the security of the 2020 election beforehand, to protect Americans’ votes once the predictable catastrophe of mail-in balloting unfolded on November 3, or to provide any semblance of the rule of law afterward that could have remedied the election’s obvious and multifaceted failures and halted America’s downward decline toward a banana republic farce whose elections look less reliable than those in Venezuela.

Yet the common sense of the American people has largely prevailed over the “Big Lie,” an astonishing accomplishment during a time when Americans have never been more controlled by government authorities micromanaging everything, from what they wear across their faces to which pronouns they use to refer to others.

I have always been of the opinion that whether the full scale of the 2020 election’s fraud and manipulation ever comes to light, the historical record will never be able to account for three facts that betray most Americans’ common sense: (1) no president for a century and a half has won more votes during re-election than he did for his first election yet lost re-election, and President Trump gained over ten million new votes over his 2016 victory; (2) Joe Biden, a man evincing obvious signs of mental decline and dementia who generated historically low levels of excitement among his own Democrat voters, somehow won over fifteen million more votes than Barack Obama, the political rock star who energized Democrats like no other politician in recent memory, managed in 2012; and (3) President Trump won almost every traditional bellwether county in the country from coast to coast by double-digits.

After a year when Facebook and Twitter did everything they could to minimize Trump’s reach to his voters and his voters’ reach to each other, and after years of outright Pravda corporate news that pushed the Deep State’s “Russia collusion” and Ukraine “quid pro quo” lies to take down a sitting president, President Trump’s vote totals in 2020 were still so remarkable that they would have normally indicated a resounding mandate from the American people.

It is revealing that, unlike other past election losses, there was no great Republican “autopsy” done in order to pinpoint what went wrong, as there was after Mitt Romney’s 2012 failure.  Other than an occasional assertion that Republicans “must do better with suburban women,” there is no serious analysis about how Republicans should improve upon President Trump’s 2016 totals.  The reason why is obvious: he did better with voters, in general, than any other sitting president in history, and with minority voters in particular than any Republican in sixty years.

When George Bush recently remarked that Republicans would lose future elections if they appealed only to a “white, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant” base, his out-of-touch assessment of the 2020 election was apparent to anyone paying attention.  However WASP-y George Bush’s Republican Party may have been, it is Donald Trump who expanded the party’s reach to Americans of every background, and Trump’s direct engagement with black voters has been so successful that even Obama was forced to minimize the accomplishment as merely due to Trump’s “macho style.”

Trump built that.  Most Americans seem to have figured that out.

The problem with using the organs of the State to advance outright lies is that the State becomes less and less credible as more lies are revealed for what they are.  The audit in Maricopa County, Arizona involves the votes of one county out of roughly 3,100 in the United States, but after six months when Americans’ collective common sense has been at odds with the collective narrative of the powers that be, one county’s truth could expose a whole nation’s lies.

No wonder Democrats find it so “dangerous.”

May 9, 2021. Tags: , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Here’s How You Know Democrats Rigged and Stole the 2020 Election


Here’s How You Know Democrats Rigged and Stole the 2020 Election

By Wayne Allyn Root

May 9, 2021

Let me put this in terms even Democrats can understand.

Let’s say a white police officer killed a black man who did nothing wrong. Unlike George Floyd, this man had not committed any crime, did not resist arrest, didn’t have fentanyl in his system and had no record of violent crime. Assume this poor guy was a law-abiding, taxpaying, churchgoing American and that the cop killed him for the crime of “driving while black.”

How do the police react? They say the shooting was righteous. They refuse to investigate. There is bodycam footage, but they refuse to release it. And get this: They refuse to allow anyone to even talk about it. If any cop talks about it, he loses his job. If anyone in the black community talks about it, social media will suspend them or ban them for life.

What would all of that mean to you? Guilty as charged, right? The police must be covering up a crime. No one who’s innocent acts like that, right?

Guess what? That’s equivalent to the reaction (or, should I say, overreaction) of liberals, Democrats and assorted socialists and communists when Republicans make accusations of massive voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election.

I thought we’re all allowed to have our opinion in America. I thought we have free speech. I thought we have a right to investigate. I thought we have a right to see the videotapes. I thought we have a right to forensic audits.

I was wrong.

The fix is in. It’s crystal clear to me now that not only was the election rigged but so is everything post-election. It’s simple psychology. Just look at the absurd reaction, or overreaction, by Democrats.

Would anyone dare ban the right to discuss a possibly racist police killing? Can you imagine the reaction by liberals, black activists and the American Civil Liberties Union? What if the Minneapolis police were to permanently ban any discussion of George Floyd’s death? What if every black American trying to give his or her opinion on Twitter, Facebook or YouTube were banned for life?

Who would react like that? Only guilty people.

Here are the questions I want answered.

        — If Democrats didn’t rig and steal the election, why are they so afraid of forensic audits in key battleground states, specifically the current audit in Arizona?

        — When Trump was an 8-to-1 landslide favorite with bettors around the world late on election night and clearly headed toward a landslide electoral victory, why did five states suddenly announce they would pause counting for the night? And how come Biden was suddenly ahead by morning?

        — How come Michigan apparently had a dump of 149,772 votes at 6:31 a.m. on Nov. 4, 96% of which went to Biden?

        — How did Wisconsin count 149,520 votes for Biden from 3:26 to 3:44 a.m. on Nov. 4?

        — How come Philadelphia vote counters were so desperate to keep witnesses out of the counting room? Why did they refuse entry to witnesses (to Republicans) until those witnesses had a court order in hand?

        — Why were the windows in a vote-counting location in Detroit covered with cardboard so nobody (no Republican) could see inside?

        — There are videotapes filmed in Detroit of vans pulling up in the middle of the night with what obviously look like boxes of ballots. In Atlanta, there are videotapes that clearly show ballot containers appearing at a vote-counting location after a fake water main break was used to force all GOP witnesses out of the counting room. Why can’t we discuss these videotapes?

        — How come Twitter banned me for life over mentioning these videotapes?

        — How come the Arizona Senate’s liaison for the vote audit says Maricopa County hasn’t complied with the subpoena by turning over passwords to Dominion voting machines?

        — How come the Biden DOJ suddenly wants to stop the Arizona audit?

These are all valid questions. Why do we get backlash for asking them and posting them on social media? What are Democrats hiding? What are they so afraid of?

In the end, that’s the proof Democrats rigged and stole the 2020 presidential election. The truth is in their ridiculous, heavy-handed overreaction. They’re desperate to stop you from looking into or even talking about this.

Democrats are guilty as sin.

May 9, 2021. Tags: , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

The Washington Post, MSNBC, and CNN are all covering a new audit of 2.1 million ballots in Maricopa County, Arizona

This is not a recount. It’s an audit.

Every single ballot will be shown on camera for the public to see.

All citizens of Maricopa County were invited to participate in and observe the audit.

Among other things:

* They will be looking to see if any of the mail-in ballots are lacking fold marks.

* They will be looking to see if long strings of consecutive ballots were filled in by machine or rubber stamp, instead of by hand.

* They will be looking to see if long strings of consecutive ballots were all filled in using the same kind of ink.

Any of those things would be proof of cheating.

For quite some time, Democrats have been trying to prevent this audit from happening. I wonder what they are afraid of.

But now the audit is finally happening.

Alternative news sources have been talking about this for a very long time. But now the mainstream media has finally decided to cover it.

This is the free version of an article from the Washington Post:


This video includes coverage from MSNBC and CNN:



April 24, 2021. Tags: , , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Attorney Matthew DePerno Releases Michigan Elections Forensics Report – 66,194 Unregistered Ballots Tallied in JUST 9 COUNTIES


HUGE NEWS: Attorney Matthew DePerno Releases Michigan Elections Forensics Report – 66,194 Unregistered Ballots Tallied in JUST 9 COUNTIES

By Jim Hoft

April 9, 2021

Michigan Constitutional Attorney Matthew Deperno released his much anticipated Michigan Elections Forensics Report on Friday.

Among the findings:

• Modem Chipsets Installed In Voting System Motherboards

• 66,194 unregistered ballots tallied in just 9 counties.

66,194 ballot voter IDs not found in October registration database.

April 9, 2021. Tags: , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

New York State Supreme Court rules against the New York Times’s request to dismiss a defamation lawsuit that was filed by Project Veritas

By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)

April 5, 2021

Project Veritas published this video about voter fraud in Minneapolis:


Afterward, the New York Times published a news article, which refers to the video as “deceptive.”

You can read the New York Times article at this link:


Project Veritas then sued the New York Time for defamation.

The New York Times tried to get the lawsuit dismissed by claiming that the writer was expressing her opinion, and that it was not a statement of fact.

However, The New York State Supreme Court ruled that because the New York Times accusation of deception was in a news article, and not an opinion column, the lawsuit can proceed.

Now, in order to defend itself, the New York Times must prove that the video is deceptive.

You can read the court’s ruling at this link:


And here’s an article about the court’s ruling:


I’m no legal expert. But I am curious to see what the New York Times will do in order to prove that the video is deceptive.

April 5, 2021. Tags: , , , , , , . Ilhan Omar, Media bias, Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Green Bay Officials Turn Down Request to Testify on March 31 After they Gave Dem Operatives Access to Voting Room and Internet Network During Election — They Say They’re Busy


Green Bay Officials Turn Down Request to Testify on March 31 After they Gave Dem Operatives Access to Voting Room and Internet Network During Election — They Say They’re Busy

By Jim Hoft

March 24, 2021

Earlier this month Wisconsin Spotlight reported that former top Democrat operative Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein was given keys to the KI Center ballroom in Green Bay, Wisconsin where absentee ballots were stored and counted for days prior to the 2020 election.

Newly released emails by Wisconsin Spotlight confirmed this development in the battleground state of Wisconsin.

Then earlier today we reported – Emails show that Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein, Wisconsin state lead for the National Vote at Home Institute, was given secret internet access at the hotel convention center where ballots were counted in Green Bay.

Wisconsin Spotlight is reporting on this Wisconsin scandal.

But Mayor Genrich and City Attorney Vanessa Chavez refuse to testify before state lawmakers. They say they are busy.

FOX 11 reported:

The Assembly committee members didn’t invite city officials to the first hearing on March 10th, but they did invite them to the one next week.

Mayor Eric Genrich and City Attorney Vanessa Chavez say a scheduling conflict will prevent them from attending.

Chavez sent FOX 11 a letter she sent to committee chair, State Rep. Janel Brandtjen (R-Menominee Falls):

Hello Rep. Brandtjen. Thank you for extending an invitation to testify at the March 31st hearing to the City. I would be the proper person to represent the City. Unfortunately, I have a scheduling conflict on that day, so the City will not be able to attend on March 31st. However, as you may know, the City of Green Bay Common Council has tasked me with drafting a report on the City’s activities with respect to the election, which I am happy to share once it is complete, which will likely be ahead of the March 31st meeting. Finally, if you are hoping to have someone attend in person, I can certainly look at coordinating for a future date. Please let me know. Thanks.

Chavez says she has not heard back from Brandtjen.

They have prior commitments and can’t make it?


March 24, 2021. Tags: , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

DeKalb County, Georgia threw away ballots, envelopes, and other information required to be retained by law for 22 months


DeKalb County, GA Is Throwing Away Ballots, Envelopes, Other Information Required To Be Retained By Law For 22 Months… Question Is, Why?

March 23, 2021

The documents in these images were found in trash receptacles outside of Dekalb County election facilities after the inauguration of Joe Biden on Jan 20th of this year.

Dekalb County, GA is breaking the law as the possibility of audits and inspection of ballots from the Nov 3rd U.S. general election and the Jan 5th Senate runoff in Georgia become more likely. Multiple legal challenges are working their way through the courts to the massive election fraud executed in the Peach State last election cycle.

Today a Gwinnett County court looks to be forcing ballot images to be presented in a non-partisan election suit. A court in Henry County is accepting a plan tomorrow by VoterGA.org for an audit of the ballots in Fulton County from the general election.

Federal election law states:

“Every officer of election shall retain and preserve, for a period of twenty-two months from the date of any general, special, or primary election of which candidates for the office of President, Vice President, presidential elector, Member of the Senate, Member of the House of Representatives, or Resident Commissioner from the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico are voted for, all records and papers which come into his possession relating to any application, registration, payment of poll tax, or other act requisite to voting in such election, except that, when required by law, such records and papers may be delivered to another officer of election and except that, if a State or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico designates a custodian to retain and preserve these records and papers at a specified place, then such records and papers may be deposited with such custodian, and the duty to retain and preserve any record or paper so deposited shall devolve upon such custodian. Any officer of election or custodian who willfully fails to comply with this section shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.”

Ballot envelopes can be inspected to determine if they were sealed in bulk or sealed individually by different people. This is why they must be maintained.

In addition, it looks as if Dekalb County may have counted ballots not placed in official ballot envelopes, but in crude counterfeit envelopes.

GA Secretary of State Raffensperger is not interested in stopping this destruction of evidence. He is not interested in investigating election fraud.

There must be a Federal grand jury convened to hear all of the evidence of election fraud in Atlanta, GA. The November 3rd, 2020 election, and the Senate runoff on Jan 5th are a travesty of justice foisted on the American people. It cannot be allowed to stand. Further investigation is required.

March 24, 2021. Tags: , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Receipts show that Dekalb County, Georgia ordered 25 million voter registration applications for a population of less than one million


BREAKING UPDATE: It Looks To Us Like Dekalb County, GA Did Order 25M Voter Registration Forms For A Population Of Less Than 1M

March 13, 2021

UPDATE 3/24 1520 EST – CDMedia has examined additional receipts found in trash receptacles outside Dekalb County election facilities after the Biden inauguration. The document found (in original article below) which shows Democrat-controlled county ordered 25 million voter registration applications for a population of less than one million seems to be valid. We found other receipts from counties with populations of the same order of magnitude and the order procedure, and discount codes used are the same. See Below.

CDMedia called Dekalb County director of Voter Registration and Elections Erica Hamilton and asked her if the Nov 11th, 2020 receipt for $20M was valid. She refused to answer and gave us a Gmail address for a PR person to answer for her.

Frankly, we find this absurd, as the county should field its own media inquiries, not a Leftist-controlled private media spin operation.

To solve the problem, we have filed an open records request with Erica Hamilton. She has three days to respond.

We will keep our readers advised to the progress.

The other receipts found are directly below.

Questions Raised

Why did Dekalb order 25M voter registration applications prior to the Jan 5th Senatorial runoff, which decided control of American government?

Why does Dekalb County use a private firm to interact with the public?

CDMedia has been reporting on information found in dumpsters outside of GA election facilities. We thought this one was especially interesting. Dekalb County, on the east side of metro Atlanta, with a population significantly less than one million, possibly ordered in November of last year after the general election, 25 million voter registration applications.

Dekalb was suspiciously slow on the evening of the GA Senatorial runoff election on January 5th of this year.

You can see the receipt below.

What could possibly be the reason for this order? At the very least, this needs to be investigated by GA election officials and law enforcement.

You be the judge.

March 24, 2021. Tags: , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. 4 comments.

Democrats’ operative got secret internet connection at Wisconsin election center, emails show


Democrats’ Operative Got Secret Internet Connection at Wisconsin Election Center, Emails Show

By M.D. Kittle

March 23, 2021

A veteran Democratic operative intricately involved in Green Bay’s November election was given access to “hidden” identifiers for the internet network at the hotel convention center where ballots were counted, according to emails obtained by Wisconsin Spotlight.

Green Bay city officials insist the presidential election was “administered exclusively by city staff.” But the emails show that Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein, Wisconsin state lead for the National Vote at Home Institute, had a troubling amount of contact with election administration Nov. 4.

“I’ll have my team create two separate SSID’s for you,” Trent Jameson, director of event technology at Green Bay’s Hyatt Regency and KI Convention Center, where the city’s Central Count was located on Election Day, wrote to Spitzer-Rubenstein.

SSID stands for Service Set Identifier. It’s an internet network’s name. Open up the list of Wi-Fi networks on your laptop or phone, and the list of SSIDs will pop up. Wireless router or access points broadcast SSIDs so nearby devices can find and display any available networks.

Hiding the identifier keeps the network name from being publicly broadcast. The identifier won’t immediately pop up in the display, although the network name remains available for use.

“One SSID will be hidden and it’s: 2020vote. There will be no password or splash page for this one and it should only be used for the sensitive machines that need to be connected to the internet,” Jameson wrote in his Oct. 27 email to Spitzer-Rubenstein.

Spitzer-Rubenstein in turn forwarded the email Oct. 30 to Celestine Jeffreys, Green Bay Mayor Eric Genrich’s chief of staff.

Also on the email were Amaad Rivera-Wagner, the mayor’s community liaison; Jaime Fuge, Green Bay’s chief election inspector at the time; Shelby Edlebeck, multimedia communications specialist; and Mike Hronek, the city’s information technology administrator.

“The other SSID will be: gbvote and that one can be seen in the settings app of your phone or laptop under ‘networks’ and should be used for the poll workers who need internet,” Jameson wrote in the email to Spitzer-Rubenstein.

Jameson told Spitzer-Rubenstein there would be a third identifier, which was to be used by media or other guests “not part of your team.”

Why would a guy who has been described as a consultant or adviser to the city need to have hidden SSIDs? Why would the city want him to have knowledge of Service Set Identifers for “sensitive machines”?

Spitzer-Rubenstein was brought in to provide technical support, but why would he receive such sensitive information before the city’s IT director and the clerk’s office did?

Genrich, Green Bay’s mayor, did not return Wisconsin Spotlight’s call seeking comment.

In final official results in Wisconsin, Democrat nominee Joe Biden defeated President Donald Trump by 49.6% to 48.9% of the vote, flipping a state with 10 electoral votes that Trump won in 2016.

As Wisconsin Spotlight first reported, Spitzer-Rubenstein and his National Vote at Home Institute were involved heavily in Green Bay’s election process.

The National Vote at Home Institute is one of several private, left-leaning groups funded largely by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

Spitzer-Rubenstein, with an impressive political resume of working for Democratic politicians and campaigns, had significant influence over the administration of the presidential election in Green Bay and, it appears, in Milwaukee as well.

The Chicago-based Center for Tech and Civic Life received hundreds of millions of dollars in funding from Zuckerberg and his wife, money they pumped out in big grants to cities in the name of “safe elections.”

>>> Zuckerberg Grant Allowed Outsider to Infiltrate Presidential Election in Wisconsin

Spitzer-Rubenstein appears to have played point man for the coordinated effort among the “Wisconsin 5” cities: Milwaukee, Madison, Green Bay, Kenosha, and Racine—which received a combined $6.3 million in Zuckerberg money.

Emails show Spitzer-Rubenstein offered to correct or “cure” ballots in Green Bay, and he told the city clerk that he had come up with a similar process for Milwaukee.

And despite the city’s assertions that Spitzer-Rubenstein did not have the keys to the KI Center where absentee ballots were, a hotel contract obtained by Wisconsin Spotlight shows the keys were to be delivered to the Democratic operative.

“Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein will be the onsite contact for the group,” the hotel’s instructions state.

Emails show him inside the KI Center asking city officials about where ballots would be located.

“Are the ballots going to be in trays/boxes within the bin? I’m at KI now, trying to figure out whether we’ll need to move the bins throughout the day or if we can just stick them along the wall and use trays or something similar to move the ballots between stations,” Spitzer-Rubenstein wrote to city officials two days before the election.

There’s more.

Sandy Juno, former Brown County clerk who has accused Green Bay of going “rogue” in its handling of the election, said she found use of the secretive internet access points “unusual.”

Spitzer-Rubenstein is shown in photos working on a laptop by a printer at Central Count on election night.

“I’m not sure what the need was for all of those different [Service Set] IDs, but the one that bothered me most was for the ‘sensitive machines,’” Juno said.

March 24, 2021. Tags: , , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

New data show 92,367 mail ballots in Nevada went to the wrong addresses – in a single county


New Data Show 92,367 Mail Ballots in Nevada Went to Wrong Addresses – in a Single County

By J. Christian Adams

March 17, 2021

Hindsight is 20/20, and now numbers from the 2020 election show how Nevada made a mistake rushing to automatic mail ballots. Dirty voter rolls combined with automatic mail made the 2020 election a mess in Nevada.

Concrete post-election data show that 92,367 mail ballots sent out by Clark County election officials came back as undeliverable. They had incorrect or outdated addresses.

That means they were sent where the registered voter did not live. That means someone else could have snatched those misdirected live ballots. That means someone probably did.

This unfortunate number is unwelcome considering President Joe Biden only carried Nevada by 33,596 votes. Clark’s 92,367 bounced ballots demonstrate a real vulnerability with mass mail balloting.

That’s just Clark County where Las Vegas is. The number of ballots that went to the wrong addresses statewide is most certainly much higher.

It is true that these ballots ultimately bounced back uncast. If nothing else, that’s a lot of wasted paper and postage. But how many ballots never came back because there wasn’t yet clear information about the registrants who had died or moved away?

More importantly, sending 92,367 ballots to the wrong places was a gamble our system of electing leaders should not be making.

Remember, last year The Public Interest Legal Foundation, an organization I am affiliated with, documented through video that ballots were mailed and cast from vacant lots, abandoned mines, liquor stores, and casinos in Nevada.

Nobody should want tens of thousands of ballots floating through the mails to destinations unknown. Elections don’t run well when voting is scattered and distant from election officials. The 92,367 bounced ballots demonstrate slack in the system.

Never mind all that, Congress is considering making it worse.

Despite the evidence of problems with mail ballots in Nevada and other states including Pennsylvania, Congress is trying to push more of our elections into the mail. The bill is called H.R.1 and now is in the Senate for consideration.

H.R.1 would federalize control over state elections. It would undo the very compromise that led to the creation of the United States, namely that states control their own elections. H.R.1 would put bureaucrats in Washington, D.C., in charge of every aspect of elections.

Not only will H.R. 1 mandate more mail-in balloting, but it will also increase the inaccuracies in voter rolls, resulting in more undeliverable ballots across the United States.

H.R. 1 would also strip states of control over their own elections.

One of HR 1’s many inane provisions prevents election officials from checking the eligibility and qualifications of voters. This includes restrictions on using the United States Postal Service change-of-address system to help do maintenance on the voter lists. This will only result in more ballots being sent to the wrong places.

If passed, H.R.1 would institutionalize slack and chaos in elections. We need to learn from the lessons — and data — of 2020 and pass laws that increase the accuracy of voter rolls and trust in our elections. Instead, HR 1 amplifies the shortcomings of 2020 on a national scale.

Mass mail voting is a step backward for the United States. We now have real data. Nobody wants 100,000 live blank ballots sent out in the mail to bad addresses. It’s time for election officials to clean voter rolls and reconsider relying on the post office in helping to decide elections.

March 17, 2021. Tags: , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Michigan judge rules secretary of state violated election law by unilaterally changing absentee voting rules


Michigan judge rules secretary of state violated election law by unilaterally changing absentee voting rules

By Andrew Mark Miller

March 16, 2021

A judge has ruled that Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson violated state law last year when she issued “guidance” on how absentee ballots should be evaluated.

State Court of Claims Judge Christopher Murray ruled last week that Benson, a Democrat, did not follow the proper rule-making process when instructing voting clerks in October to presume the accuracy of absentee ballot signatures, and the guidance is now invalid, according to the Detroit News.

“The presumption is found nowhere in state law,” Murray, a Republican-appointed judge, wrote in the ruling. “The mandatory presumption goes beyond the realm of mere advice and direction, and instead is a substantive directive that adds to the pertinent signature-matching standards.”

Murray wrote that Benson issued the rules without following the process for creating a rule under state and federal law, thus violating the state’s Administrative Procedures Act.

Murray contends that the rule stated only signatures with “multiple significant and obvious” inconsistencies should be questioned, which he argued fell within the definition of an administrative rule that required a multiple-step process that was not undertaken last year.

“An agency must utilize formal rulemaking procedures when establishing policies that ‘do not merely interpret or explain the statute or rules from which the agency derives its authority,’ but rather ‘establish the substantive standards implementing the program,’” Murray wrote.

Michigan is one of six states where former President Donald Trump and his surrogates have alleged widespread voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election, potentially costing him a victory, and Republicans have argued that Article II of the Constitution requires election rules to be decided by state legislatures and not elected officials.

Trump lost dozens of election fraud legal challenges across the country, and the United States Supreme Court rejected three different cases on the subject.

March 17, 2021. Tags: , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Judge Determines Secretary Of State Benson Violated The States Administrative Procedures Act On Absentee Voter Signatures


Judge Determines Secretary Of State Benson Violated The States Administrative Procedures Act On Absentee Voter Signatures

March 16, 2021

This news is certainly being kept under the cover. The media is certainly not on the Democratic Party’s side, right? I would have never known this occurred if I had not seen a Press Release from State Representative Matt Hall’s Office.

It started when the Allegan County Clerk-Register of Deeds Bob Genetski with the Republican Party sued Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson in her official capacity and Jonathan Brater, Director of Elections in his official capacity.  They sued her because they believed she violated Michigan’s Administrative Procedures Act when she solely decided the voter ballot signature matching guidelines prior to the 2020 election.

As the court document stated:

“Jocelyn Benson issued what defendants refer to as “guidance” for local clerks who are charged with inspecting signatures on absent voter ballot  applications  and  ballots.  The document,  which  was  entitled “Absent  Voter  Ballot Processing: Signature Verification and Voter Notification Standards”.  This guidance regarding signature verification forms the  heart of the issues in the present case and it requires additional examination.   

The stated purpose of the at issue document was to “provide[ ] standards” for reviewing signatures, verifying signatures, and curing missing or mismatched signatures.  Under a heading entitled “Procedures for Signature Verification,” the document stated that signature review “begins with the presumption that” the signature on an absent voter ballot application or envelope is valid.”

You should read the ruling because it explains how Secretary of State Benson watered down the signature verification requirements so much, if someone had what looked to be the letter “i” in their name and it somewhat looked like there may or may not have been an “i” in their signature you were supposed to approve it.  It was actually heartbreaking to see what Benson did.  What she did was tantamount to invite and enable illegal votes to be cast.

For example, the document issued by Benson stated:

“Signatures “should be considered questionable” the guidance explained, only if they differ “in multiple, significant and obvious respects from the signature on file.” (Emphasis in original). “[W]henever possible,” election officials were to resolve “[s]light dissimilarities” in favor of finding that the voter’s signature was valid.”

How did the judge rule, well since you are hearing nothing about this in the news you probably have already guessed?  Michigan Court of Claims Judge Christopher Murray ruled:

‘Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson violated Michigan’s Administrative Procedures Act because the guidance issued by the Secretary of State on October 6, 2020, with respect to signature matching standards was issued in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act.”

In a nutshell, SoS Benson violated the state of Michigan’s Administrative Procedures Act due to the fact that she set absent voter ballot signature matching guidelines prior to the 2020 election on her own circumventing the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act. An administrative rule is an agency’s written regulation, statement, standard, policy, ruling, or instruction that has the effect of law.

That is why you are hearing nothing from any other news source out there other than my show and WBCK.  Where is the Detroit News, Detroit Free Press, Lansing State Journal, any of the local news stations from Detroit to Kalamazoo to Grand Rapids and beyond?

Nowhere on this story.

Wonder why?

March 16, 2021. Tags: , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Court invalidates Michigan rule on how to verify absentee ballot application signatures


Court invalidates Michigan rule on how to verify absentee ballot application signatures

By Gus Burns

March 16, 2021

Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson last year said local clerks should start with a presumption of validity when verifying signatures on absentee ballot applications, but a court ruling says that rule wasn’t properly established.

A Michigan Court of Claims judge last week ruled that clerks no longer need to follow those instructions for determining whether to send an absentee ballot to applicants.

According to the March 9 opinion and order issued by Judge Christopher M. Murray, Benson issued instructions that constituted “rules” without following the process for creating a formal rule under state and federal law.

Murray wrote that “the guidance issued by the Secretary of State on October 6, 2020, with respect to signature-matching standards was issued in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act.”

The Michigan Republican Party and Allegan County Clerk Robert Genetski, who jointly filed their complaint prior to the Nov. 3 election, claimed the signature standards allowed for “invalid” ballots to be counted.

Murray noted in his opinion that Genetski, however, never claimed the “guidance caused him to accept a signature that he believed was invalid.”

Benson’s guidelines focused on signature verification of absentee ballot applications and their return envelopes, which were to be compared against each other as well as against signatures in qualified voter files.

Benson’s office said “that signature review ‘begins with the presumption that’ the signature on an absent voter ballot application or envelope is valid,” Murray wrote. The Secretary of State’s instructions to clerks further said signatures with any “redeeming qualities” — described as those having “similar distinctive flourishes” or those with “more matching features than nonmatching features” — should be validated.

Only signatures with “multiple significant and obvious” inconsistencies should be questioned, Benson advised, according to the judge’s analysis of the rule.

Murray determined the guidelines fell within the definition of an administrative rule and therefore should have been approved through the formal rule-making process, which requires multiple steps.

“An agency must utilize formal rulemaking procedures when establishing policies that ‘do not merely interpret or explain the statute or rules from which the agency derives its authority,’ but rather ‘establish the substantive standards implementing the program,’” Murray said, citing a 1998 precedent.

The ruling leaves certain standards for accepting absentee ballot application signatures at the discretion of the local clerk, unless the Legislature created legal guidelines or the Secretary of State’s Office creates administrative rules for that determination.

The current law states any signatures on applications or return envelopes that don’t “agree sufficiently” with the voter signature on file should be rejected.

The Court of Claims judge noted Michigan law doesn’t clearly define what it means for a signature to “agree” or “agree sufficiently.”

Representatives from Attorney General Dana Nessel’s office didn’t respond to a request for comment on the ruling and it’s unclear if the Court of Claims decision will be appealed.

“We have no comment at this time,” Tracy Wimmer, an SOS spokeswoman said.

Clerks additionally compare signatures on absentee ballots with signatures on file before votes are counted during any election.

Fewer than 1 percent of Michigan’s 3.3 million absentee ballots cast in the Nov. 3 general election were rejected by local election clerks, according to data released by the Secretary of State’s office.

In total, 15,300 ballots were rejected by election officials for a variety of reasons, such as arriving after Election Day or not having a signature. In the August primary election, more than the 10,600 ballots were rejected.

March 16, 2021. Tags: , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

MI Court: Michigan Secretary of State’s Absentee Ballot Order Broke Law, Vindicating Trump Claim


MI Court: Michigan Secretary of State’s Absentee Ballot Order Broke Law, Vindicating Trump Claim

By Kyle Olson

March 16, 2021

A Michigan judge ruled last week Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson (D) broke state law when she unilaterally issued rules related to absentee balloting, legitimizing a key claim made by the Trump campaign in its legal challenges to the 2020 election.

Benson issued several unilateral orders during the 2020 election including sending absentee ballot applications to all registered voters. She also issued “guidance” on how to evaluate absentee ballots, a move Michigan Court of Claims Chief Judge Christopher Murray held violated the state’s Administrative Procedures Act.

In the guidance, Benson said “slight similarities” in signatures on absentee ballots should lead a counter to decide “in favor of finding that the voter’s signature was valid.”

Murray ruled Benson violated the law “because the guidance issued by the Secretary of State on October 6, 2020, with respect to signature matching standards was issued in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA).”

“I’m glad the court sees Secretary of State Benson’s attempts at lawmaking for what they are — clear violations of her authority,” Michigan state Rep. Matt Hall (R) said in a statement.

“If she wants to make changes like these, she needs to work with the Legislature or properly promulgate them through the laws we have on the books — in this case the Administrative Procedures Act,” he continued.

Murray’s ruling came after Allegan County Clerk Bob Genetski sued Benson and state Director of Elections Jonathan Brater over Benson’s order which Hall described as a “mandatory directive requiring local election officials to apply a presumption of validity to all signatures on absent voter ballots.”

According to the suit, Genetski argued “the presumption contained in the guidance issued by defendant Benson will allow invalid votes to be counted,” but Genetski did not allege “that this guidance caused him to accept a signature that he believed was invalid.”

The court’s opinion concluded:

…nowhere in this state’s election law has the Legislature indicated that signatures are to be presumed valid, nor did the Legislature require that signatures are to be accepted so long as there are any redeeming qualities in the application or return envelope as compared with the signature on file. Policy determinations like the one at issue — which places the thumb on the scale in favor of a signature’s validity — should be made pursuant to properly promulgated rules under the APA or by the Legislature.

Like other progressive secretaries of state, Benson put an aggressive emphasis on voting by absentee ballot in the name of safety amid the Chinese coronavirus pandemic.

Over 3.1 million Michigan voters cast an absentee ballot out of a possible 7.7 million voters, WWMT News reported.

In May 2020, Benson used $4.5 million in funds from the CARES Act — the original coronavirus stimulus — to send absentee ballot applications to all voters, according to Breitbart News.

“By mailing applications, we have ensured that no Michigander has to choose between their health and their right to vote,” Benson said according to NBC 25.

“Voting by mail is easy, convenient, safe, and secure, and every voter in Michigan has the right to do it,” she continued.

Hall noted, “The Legislature is an equal branch of government charged with crafting laws. This is not the role of the Secretary of State, and there is a clear process that must be respected.”

Signature validation rules created without the approval of a legislature was one of the issues the Trump campaign and Republicans claimed was done illegally in the 2020 election.

Trump’s campaign and Republicans argued in cases nationwide that Article II of the Constitution requires state legislatures to make the rules governing presidential elections, and state election officials and courts lack the authority to change those rules.

Murray’s ruling undercuts the Democrat narrative that Republican legal challenges to 2020 election procedures were without merit and had therefore all been rejected by the courts. The original suit was filed October 6, 2020 — prior to the presidential election — but was not decided until March 9, 2021.

The case is Genetski v. Benson, No. 20-216-MM in the Court of Claims for the State of Michigan.

March 16, 2021. Tags: , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Judge rules 30,000 suspected counterfeit ballots analyzed in Georgia


March 16, 2021. Tags: , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

The sovereign crime of industrial scale vote fraud


The Sovereign Crime of Industrial Scale Vote Fraud

By Jay Valentine

March 16, 2021

Recently our team was invited to meet with 2020 election fraud investigators in downtown Austin.  Our team, with some of the top criminal profiling talent in the country, was happy to attend.  At the last minute, our new pals cancelled their meeting.

Since we changed our schedules and lost those days, we decided to hold our own confab.

Our team members were the lead builders of one of the world’s most sophisticated criminal profiling systems in use by law enforcement today.  We broke the eBay auction fraud rings and deployed a never-before-used technology to end auction fraud as an emerging crime category. We identified numerous Medicaid fraud rings and were hired by most of the top 10 property and casualty insurance firms to solve auto crash rings that eluded the FBI and every fraud technology.

What we do not talk about much is our team’s record predicting crime.  There were several occasions when we predicted terrorist activity and warned government agencies.  There is a particularly famous one, involving a military base, where they did not listen.  That’s one for another day.

When you are at the table with some of the top criminal profilers in the world, talking about industrial scale election fraud, you do more listening than talking.  And the listening was interesting.  The profilers have zero interest in U.S. elections.  Two of them did not vote and had unflattering opinions about both presidential candidates.  Their comments were most insightful because they saw the current questions about election fraud so differently than the American media.

To them, 2020 election fraud was an industrial level crime.  It was of such magnitude that it moved from the category of an election crime to a sovereign crime.

Sovereign crime.  It does have a ring to it.

Sovereign crime is not something we see a lot of in America as our governmental institutions are generally not organized to commit, support or hide a crime.

Most Americans have never seen an organized crime take place, in plain view, supported by or covered up by governmental institutions.  But it happens all the time around the world, even in some countries that are quite Westernized.

Sovereign crime means your government was a participant, active or passive, enabling vote fraud.

Governors and secretaries of state refusing to cleanse voter rolls, refusing to check signatures for mail-in ballots – even during recounts, changing the voting rules weeks before an election, qualifies as your government messing with your vote.

The national government refusing to investigate the most egregious examples of voter fraud like hundreds of thousands of more ballots than voters in several states, that is a pretty good indicator that they are passive participants in industrial level vote fraud.

The refusal of the FBI to fully investigate Jesse Morgan’s truck with the hundreds of thousands of ballots going from New York to Pennsylvania – yet dispatching agents to a NASCAR location to investigate a garage pull-down they hoped was a noose – well, that’s a good indicator, too.

Wait, we’re not done here.

The United States Postal Service managers telling employees to backdate ballots so they could be counted illegally.  Does that sound like your government – sovereign government – participating in vote fraud?

Our team noted that this might be the first time in American history that the government from the states to the national to its agencies coordinated to either fake the vote or hide the faking.

Our profilers comfortably said the 2020 election fraud was on such a scale that it was impossible for the major law enforcement agencies to not have known about it in advance.

Governmental law enforcement either actively engaged in the fraud, which is impossible to prove, or knowingly acquiesced after the fact.

Pretty clearly, the evidence is piling up that the FBI had zero interest in trucks with ballots crossing state lines, ballots being shredded in Maricopa County, tens of thousands of ballots received before being mailed and all sorts of other clues any competent law enforcement agency would at least investigate.

The conversation did not go where I expected it.

There was no interest on our profilers’ part in doing investigation of massive voter fraud.  They felt it was so obvious and the current work being done by citizens and published on hard-to-find blogs was state-of-the-art and no further investigations would find much more. Their comments were striking because they said the data easily available showed the election fraud patterns had two very alarming characteristics: It was not the first time this was tried, and it will be performed again, at scale, in the next election.

Here is where the conversation got very interesting:

Violent criminals have known profiles and when law enforcement properly applies certain profiles, there can be very accurate predictions about what such persons will do next.

Fraud criminals have their own patterns.  When we were doing insurance fraud, we often said, with authority, that fraud is a constant.  If you stop it one place, it will pop up somewhere else.

Fraud criminals are often highly educated. In our world, they are doctors, attorneys, insurance investigators, chiropractors, running fraud rings spanning multiple states.  If someone were caught and the ring broken, those who did not go to jail did not become priests or open small businesses.  They started other fraud rings.

Fraud is a constant.  Fraud becomes a profession.

Fraud rings, when organized, grow.  They continue to expand with new entrants, slightly different profiles, corrupting more people with money that dwarfs what one might make honestly. Fraud techniques are like an organic species: what works, thrives; and what fails, dies out.  Patterns emerge.  Patterns equal prediction and prediction enables eradication.

Here is where our profilers made a critical connection.

The 2020 election fraud did not just happen.  It is impossible for an organization, spanning many states, using similar techniques (fake ballots, shutting down counting at the same time, more ballots than voters, dead voters, underage voters) to succeed the first time at bat.  There are just too many moving parts.

So here we developed a thesis.

The team, educated in some of the most sophisticated organized fraud tactics, posited that this was not a dry run.  Their thesis is that if one were to seriously evaluate the balloting in many states for 2014, 2016 and 2018, one will find traces of what happened in 2020.  That project is under discussion.

Their second thesis is that this is not over by any means.  This kind of election fraud was hugely successful.  If one even questions the 2020 election, one can be banned from social media and labeled e a “conspiracy theorist” by sovereign governmental agencies.

The team believes the best is yet to come.

Fraud perps are greedy and when left to commit fraud, for which there was likely millions of dollars in remuneration either presently or in the future, they are not going to stop. As fraudsters recognize that national law enforcement refuses to investigate and the courts will not look at evidence, they are emboldened.  Who wouldn’t be?

Our courts and law enforcement are saying “come, commit all the fraud you want, we won’t investigate, and if there is litigation, we will toss it out on procedural grounds.”

If anyone protests, the FBI may raid their home with an assault vehicle.

Don’t believe me, well, meet Christopher Worrell.

And meet retired Army Sergeant Kenneth Harrelson, who, like Chris, attended the Don’t Steal The Vote Rally and was greeted by an FBI turreted vehicle while he was cleaning out his gutters.

This is our government in action covering up election fraud.  FBI Director Chris Wray is promising each of us the Roger Stone Experience if we doth protest too much.

We are dealing with a new type of crime, at least new to most Americans:  sovereign crime.  This is it, folks!  This is what it looks like.

Just think if the courts and government did this for Medicaid fraud.  We might all do it!

So if you are an election fraud perp, what would you do?  Double down!  Yes, you would, you know you would.

Fraud is a constant.  What we saw in 2020 is going to happen in 2022 and 2024 in a very big way.  Maybe bigger since there are no constraints.

It is here the team made their most startling prediction.

The data from 2020 are strong enough to predict exactly where the most egregious fraud is going to happen and how it is going to happen.

Texas data sent to us showed the 2020-type fraud did happen in 2016 and 2018 in a smaller degree but with the same pattern.  It was not reported.  In hindsight, compared with 2020, a pattern emerges.

Profiling works.  Fraud is a constant.  Bad guys without pushback overplay their hands.

Your government, at the state and federal level, the FBI, government agencies can be in on the scam.  That is the realization slowly being accepted by millions of Americans.

We have technologies that can identify dead voters the moment they cast a ballot.  We can identify people who are out-of-state, voted twice, are underage, live in a vacant lot or a UPS or FedEx postal box.  We can even show a photo of that vacant lot so you can see where your fake neighbor claims to live.

Literally, the second their ballot is counted, they can be flagged as a likely fraud.

Yes, we can deploy that technology today.  We have done it in the insurance industry for decades.

We can predict where election fraud is going to happen.  We can predict how it is going to be done.  We can deploy technologies to identify likely fraud within seconds of when it happens.

The question is, if the government is pretty much in on the election fraud, does it really matter?

March 16, 2021. Tags: , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Judge may unseal Fulton absentee ballots for fraud investigation


Judge may unseal Fulton absentee ballots for fraud investigation

By David Wickert

March 15, 2021

A judge may unseal absentee ballots in Fulton County so a government watchdog can investigate allegations of voting fraud in the November election.

A lawsuit filed in Fulton County Superior Court contends that fraudulent ballots were cast and other irregularities occurred as workers counted ballots at State Farm Arena on election night. Those allegations were investigated and dismissed by the secretary of state’s office. Nonetheless, Henry County Superior Court Judge Brian Amero — who is overseeing the case — said he’s inclined to order the ballots to be unsealed and reviewed by experts hired by Garland Favorito, a voting-integrity advocate.

At a hearing Monday, Amero sought a detailed plan for maintaining the secrecy and security of the ballots, which — by state law — are under seal in the Fulton County Superior Court Clerk’s Office.

“We want to do this in such a way that dispels rumors and disinformation and sheds light,” Amero said at the hearing. “The devil’s in the details.”

Favorito’s case is part of a wave of lawsuits that have alleged fraud or misconduct in the November presidential election. Some sought to overturn Joe Biden’s win in Georgia, while others sought to change election rules for the January U.S. Senate runoffs.

None of them succeeded. But the accusations of fraud have inspired a slew of bills in the Georgia General Assembly that could restrict voting in the name of election security. And more recent lawsuits have sought access to ballots and other information that could shed light on fraud allegations.

In a lawsuit filed in Gwinnett County Superior Court in December, the group VoterGA is seeking copies of 100 ballot images from a recent judicial election so the group can analyze what it believes are “anomalies in the election results.”

Last week the watchdog group Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit against Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, alleging his office has violated the Georgia Open Records Act. In November, Judicial Watch requested documents related to a 2020 settlement agreement that required additional procedures before absentee ballots could be rejected for mismatched voter signatures. It also requested documents related to the processing of absentee ballots in November.

The group’s lawsuit, filed in Fulton County Superior Court, says Raffensperger’s office still hasn’t provided the requested documents. Raffensperger’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Favorito is seeking to review absentee ballots in Fulton County. He says county workers fabricated ballots and counted some ballots multiple times on election night. As evidence, his lawsuit cites video of the counting, as well as sworn statements from people who were present.

The observers were suspicious of ballots that were printed on a different stock of paper than regular ballots, appeared to have been printed instead of marked by ink in a voter’s hand or were not creased, indicating they had not been placed in an absentee ballot envelope and mailed.

Investigators with the secretary of state’s office reviewed hours of video from election night and said they saw nothing improper.

In public comments and in court documents, state and county officials say many damaged ballots must be duplicated because scanners won’t process them. And they say that ballot scanners sometimes jam, though some ballots get through the scanner before it stops. When that happens, workers scan the ballots again, but they’re not counted twice.

Gabriel Sterling, chief operating officer for the secretary of state’s office, said the witness statements in the lawsuits are wrong.

“It’s not people who are lying,” Sterling said in an interview last week. “They don’t understand what they’re saying.”

At Monday’s hearing, Amero said he’s willing to order the absentee ballots to be unsealed if he’s assured their security will not be compromised. He requested a detailed plan, including who would review the ballots, how they would analyze them and how they would secure them.

The judge also discussed a protective order that would prohibit Favorito’s experts from disclosing their work without permission from the court. And he plans to appoint a special master — perhaps a retired superior court judge — to oversee the analysis. If Amero allows it, the review of ballots could begin in late April.

“I can’t sign an order until such time as I’m satisfied that the manner and method (of review) proposed by the petitioners is reasonable,” the judge said.

March 15, 2021. Tags: , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. 1 comment.

Fulton County, GA Hearing Turns Into Laughable Circus As County Officials Use Delaying Tactics To Avoid Showing Ballots


Fulton County, GA Hearing Turns Into Laughable Circus As County Officials Use Delaying Tactics To Avoid Showing Ballots

March 13, 2021

A Ballot Inspection Hearing was heard today in Atlanta, GA on motions to compel Fulton Co. to “Show Us the Ballots” in a case filed by VoterGA.org.

Garland Favorito runs the non-profit fighting for election integrity in Georgia.

Attorneys for Fulton County, where the infamous ‘Ruby’ video showing election workings scanning ballots multiple times in the middle of the night after forcing Republican monitors to leave State Farm Arena, declared they had only 29 days to prepare and by law are allowed 30. The incredulous judge gave them until this Monday to be ready to argue why citizens of Georgia should not be able to see their own ballots.

“The Fulton Co. Elections attorney told the court that she never received the same motion the court and her fellow court attorney in the same office received from us. Then she said was not prepared to proceed on another motion because only 29 of the 30 days allotted for her response had elapsed. When we reconvene on Monday, is she going to tell the judge the dog ate her legal brief?” asked Favorito.

The delaying circus continues by Democrat officials with questionable ethics in the county known for voter fraud historically in the Peach State.

March 15, 2021. Tags: , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

UPDATE: GAG ORDER! GA Judge Gives Conditional Access To Audit Fulton County Ballots…Wants No ‘Disinformation’ Released!


UPDATE: GAG ORDER! GA Judge Gives Conditional Access To Audit Fulton County Ballots…Wants No ‘Disinformation’ Released!

March 15, 2021

UPDATE – Observations from a legal mind – the judge today added terms to increase contention and disputes, to let sides work out details and not agree on little things, so they have to come back in court. Judge wanted a specific judge as ‘special master’. Bonnefor, (sp?) who is not available for 45 days, for no reason; he had 6 names from hearing participants. Attorney Ringer (Fulton County) objected to content of election fraud affidavits being disclosed, doesn’t want any of story to come out. Judge wanted operation plan, an obvious delay tactic, 7 biz days for each side and is slow walking. He also essentially imposed a gag order- findings will be released in a confidential way, only to parties of lawsuit, mentioned doesn’t want any disinformation to be released — we call that a gag order!

Another noteworthy exchange between the Judge and (plaintiff attorney) Cheely. The judge asked if Cheely had exhausted other means of discovery and why access to the ballots was needed. Cheely replied it’s similar to contract law, you have to have the original document, no copy is allowed, and you can’t just rely on testimony about it. In this case the ballots and metadata are the evidence that requires close examination, and that he would present witnesses to testify they saw ballots produced by a copier with no human markings. That’s when the judge shifted to requiring written plans explaining every step and identifying every person who would be participating, and having hearings on the plans, thus increasing time required and cost to get a ruling out of him.


From VoterGA page:

*** GREAT news…Judge Amero just ordered a “conditional grant” of the motion to unseal the Fulton County ballots.

The only stipulation is the petitioners have to come up with a written plan (agreed to by the respondants) as to exactly how they will do the scanning, length of time, costs, manner and method, privacy protection issues addressed, names of all individuals involved, etc., etc.

Petitioners written plan is due to court on March 24.

Respondants response to plan due to court on April 5.

Court hearing on plan on April 13.



A GA judge has given conditional approval for inspection of ballots in Fulton County from the Nov 3rd general election in a hearing this morning, pending the appointment of a ‘special master’ to oversee the process.

The hearing was delayed for an hour due to a ‘Webex glitch’.

Another hearing on the matter has been scheduled for April. The approval was given over the objections of attorneys from Fulton County, where massive election fraud was executed in November, much of it caught on video.

Plaintiffs argued that tens of thousands of the Fulton County ballots counted in November were counterfeit.

March 15, 2021. Tags: , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Here are many examples of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election that, as far as I’m aware, have not been debunked. Updated for March 10, 2021.

Note: A more recent version of this list can be found at https://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/2021/05/11/stop-the-steal-5/

By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)

March 10, 2021

The mainstream media continues to insist that there is “no evidence” of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election.

They are lying.

Here are many examples of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election that, as far as I’m aware, have not been debunked:

Russell James Ramsland, Jr. audited 22 Dominion voting machines that were used in Antrim County, Michigan.

This is his conclusion from his report on his audit:

“We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.”

Source: https://www.depernolaw.com/uploads/2/7/0/2/27029178/antrim_michigan_forensics_report_[121320]_v2_[redacted].pdf


Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, and Michigan Judge Kevin Elsenheimer all tried to prevent the public from seeing Ramsland’s report on his audit.

Why did they try to prevent the public from seeing the audit?

What were they afraid of?

Also, after the audit was ordered, but before the audit actually took place, Benson ordered the memory in the voting machines to be erased.

Why did Benson order the memory in the machines to be erased before the audit?

What was she afraid of?









Mainstream media reported that Fulton County, Georgia, “stopped” counting ballots for the night because “a water pipe has broken,” and “sent the ballot counters home.”

Video shows Republican poll watchers and media reporters leaving the building.

The same video shows a few people remain, and continue counting votes without Republican poll watchers or media reporters.

Video shows an election worker scanning the same ballots three times.

There is no visible water leak in these videos.












A study of more than 3,000 U.S. counties shows that, all else being equal, counties that used Dominion voting machines gave Biden an extra 5.6% of the vote, compared to counties that did not use Dominion machines. Since all other factors were taken into account, this is almost certain proof that Democrats cheated.







YouTube banned a C-SPAN video of Trump’s lawyer’s opening statement on voter fraud from the Senate Committee Hearing.

Fortunately, BitChute has the video.

Why would YouTube ban a C-SPAN video?

What are they afraid of?






Maricopa County, Arizona rejects subpoena to audit voting machines.

What are they afraid of?

Skip to 0:48



Arizona’s Maricopa board of supervisors is playing games – Trying to block a legitimate forensic audit of 2020 election ballots – Why?


Why are Arizona’s Maricopa County board of supervisors not in jail? They are reportedly breaking the law by not handing over 2020 election ballots.


Pennsylvania accepted mail in ballots for 69 hours later than what is allowed by law.

Article 1, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution says:

“The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof”

Source: https://constitutionallawreporter.com/article-01-section-04/#:~:text=Text%20of%20Article%201%2C%20Section,the%20Places%20of%20chusing%20Senators


Pennsylvania law says:


Source: https://www.legis.state.pa.us/CFDOCS/Legis/PN/Public/btCheck.cfm?txtType=PDF&sessYr=2019&sessInd=0&billBody=S&billTyp=B&billNbr=0421&pn=1330


NPR said:

“Pennsylvania Supreme Court Extends Vote By Mail Deadline” “Mail ballots will now be accepted if they are received by 5 p.m. on the Friday after the election and were either postmarked by Nov. 3 or there is no evidence to suggest they were sent after Election Day. Previously, mail ballots had to be received by 8 p.m. on Election Day.”

Source https://www.npr.org/2020/09/17/914160122/pennsylvania-supreme-court-extends-vote-by-mail-deadline-allows-drop-boxes


In several states, vote counting was paused late at night.

Later, when counting resumed, there were giant vote spikes with impossibly high percentages for Biden.

These things only happened in the states where Democrats needed to flip the state from Trump to Biden.

They did not happen in other states.

Source: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1329543841217540096.html


DeKalb County, Georgia illegally refused to honor an Open Records Request to show the documents for the chain of custody for the absentee ballots that were submitted in drop boxes.

What are they afraid of?

Source: https://georgiastarnews.com/2020/12/05/dekalb-county-cannot-find-chain-of-custody-records-for-absentee-ballots-deposited-in-drop-boxes-it-has-not-been-determined-if-responsive-records-to-your-request-exist/


An audit of 1,400 mail-in ballots in Nevada found that 2% were cast by voters who never actually received a ballot in the mail, and 1% were cast by voters who say they didn’t even vote.

Source: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2020/12/03/trump-legal-team-we-have-so-much-evidence-of-fraud-in-nevada-we-had-to-rent-a-separate-car-n1187712


In Michigan, Federal Judge Linda Parker rejected an election lawsuit filed by Matt Braynard.

This video shows some of the claims that Braynard would have made if Judge Parker had allowed the lawsuit to proceed.

Braynard claims that his team spoke with 926 people whose names and address had been used to cast absentee ballots.

He claims that 12.6% of those people said they never requested an absentee ballot.

He plays audio from some of those people.

Why is Judge Parker afraid to let the public hear their testimony?






Page 79 of this lawsuit from Georgia says

“all 900 military ballots in Fulton County that supposedly were 100% for Joe Biden”

Source: https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf


What a computer expert said about voting results in Michigan.






Tens of thousands of ballots arrived before their sent date in Pennsylvania.

Source: https://www.theepochtimes.com/pennsylvania-100000-ballots-with-implausible-return-dates_3572942.html


In Antrim County, Michigan, human actions and/or computer software gave thousands of Trump votes to Biden.

Source: https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/06/antrim-county-results-election-2020/6185031002/


Wisconsin illegally refused to remove 234,000 names from the voting rolls even though they had moved out of the state or to a different city within the state.

All of these people had ignored a written notification that had been mailed to their old address.

Wisconsin made it very easy for all of these 234,000 names to be used for fraudulent voting, because the state allowed every single person in the state to declare themself as “indefinitely confined,” which allowed them to vote by absentee ballot, which allowed them to ignore the state’s voter ID law.

In 2019, only 72,000 voters in the state were “indefinitely confined.”

In 2020, this number more than tripled.

The state illegally kept the Green Party candidate off the ballot.

The city of Madison placed illegal drop boxes in the city’s 206 parks.

These illegal drop boxes were not supervised.

City employees “helped” voters to fill out their ballots before placing them into these illegal drop boxes.

The city of Milwaukee withheld reporting its vote totals until after it knew how many votes Biden would need to win.

Source: https://www.maciverinstitute.com/2020/11/how-the-wisconsin-elections-commission-destroyed-fair-elections-in-wisconsin/


Dominion took over Georgia voting machines remotely during 2020 election.

Source: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/breaking-exclusive-dominion-took-georgia-voting-machines-remotely/


This is what Democrats mean when they say they are in favor of “ballot harvesting.”

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4n_5V62LT-Q


You would think elections officials would want an investigation because it would exonerate them. 

But they don’t.

What are they hiding?

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2020/12/26/mccarthy-misses-the-point-in-the-michigan-election-audit/


In Pennsylvania, a certified public accountant is claiming that the number of ballots is 202,377 bigger than the number of people who actually voted.

Source: https://wjactv.com/news/local/pa-republican-lawmakers-analysis-finds-presidential-election-numbers-dont-add-up


For five states to stop counting on election night is absolutely unprecedented.

Source: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/five-states-stop-counting-election-night-absolutely-unprecedented-sidney-powell-lays-evidence-rampant-election-fraud-latest-interview-audio/


In these videos, Jovan Hutton Pulitzer – an inventor and forensics expert – explained how he will look for fraud on paper ballots.

Georgia Senate voted to let Pulitzer examine Fulton County’s absentee ballots.

But hours later, trucks showed up and employees took the ballots into hiding to prevent them from being examined.

It was later discovered that the ballots weren’t just put into hiding. They were actually put through shredders. And not just regular shredders. They used military grade shredders, which makes it impossible to reconstruct them.

Why did they destroy the ballots before they could be examined?

What are they afraid of?












A study by John Lott concluded:

“The precinct level estimates for Georgia and Pennsylvania indicate that vote fraud may account for Biden’s win in both states. The voter turnout rate data also indicates that there are significant excess votes in Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, and Wisconsin as well. While the problems shown here are large, there are two reasons to believe that they are underestimates: 1) the estimates using precinct level data assume that there is no fraud occurring with in-person voting and 2) the voter turnout estimates do not account for ballots for the opposing candidate that are lost, destroyed, or replaced with ballots filled out for the other candidate.”

Source: https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=788024004085069117067065126115080014018059046068005069022083031023002124104122014106096055049121118013030089127090114117075091006041089092044069067098001024124058012002008098068119112124080011067117107097111100097021095000001066086119073026098122&EXT=pdf&INDEX=TRUE



Dominion voting machine hacked live during Georgia election hearing.

But they’re not supposed to be connected to the internet.

Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/fwFdW4fuzJvV/


In Fulton County, Georgia, ballots in Republican-heavy areas, but not Democrat-heavy areas, were deliberately printed to create errors, in order to send them to be “fixed” by election workers.

Source: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/raffensperger-gets-caught-georgia-ballots-printed-differently-gop-counties-vs-dem-counties-election-rigged/


Georgia Witness: “93% of military ballots for Biden.”

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9Gi7af-Gz8


Georgia County Official: Raffensperger sent armed Secretary of State agents with handcuffs to the county after they complained about the inaccurate Dominion machines.

Source: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/georgia-county-official-raffensperger-sent-armed-secretary-state-agents-handcuffs-county-complained-inaccurate-dominion-machines-video/


Dominion Voting Machines CEO John Poulos said their machines “are not connected to the internet.”

But Dominion’s own training manual says they are connected to the internet.

Why did Poulos lie about this?

Source: https://youtu.be/7R1eWkPZPUY


Election supervisor shows how easy it is for election workers to change votes to whatever they want.

The official term for this form of cheating is “adjudication.”

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAHBAoy4Pis


Dominion employee Eric Coomer shows how election workers can change the votes on ballots.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtB3tLaXLJE


Video from Fulton County, Georgia, shows an election worker scanning the same ballots five times.







Data scientists: Georgia data reveals 30,000+ Trump votes removed, another 12,173 switched to Biden








Richard Barron is the Elections Director in Fulton County, Georgia.

In this video, he says:

“So far we’ve scanned 113,130 ballots. We’ve adjudicated over 106,000.”

Sources: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksR1fivmxSg



The Navarro Report.

Source: https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/be36dc6d-0df4-4c20-addf-fca72be46150/The%20Immaculate%20Deception%2012.15.20.pdf

The Navarro Report: Volume Two.

Source: https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/be36dc6d-0df4-4c20-addf-fca72be46150/The%20Art%20of%20the%20Steal%201.5.21%20FINAL.pdf

The Navarro Report: Volume Three.

Source: https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/be36dc6d-0df4-4c20-addf-fca72be46150/The%20Navarro%20Report%20Volume%20III%20Final%201.13.21-0001.pdf

Report from William T. Ligon.

Source: http://www.senatorligon.com/THE_FINAL%20REPORT.PDF


Dominion admits that their voting machines are connected to the internet.

Sources: https://twitter.com/JovanHPulitzer/status/1345830256234651653



Still no chain of custody documents produced in Georgia for 76% of absentee ballots cast in drop boxes two months ago in Presidential election.

Source: https://tennesseestar.com/2021/01/03/still-no-chain-of-custody-documents-produced-in-georgia-for-76-percent-of-absentee-ballots-cast-two-months-ago-in-presidential-election/


More than 400,000 votes were removed from Trump in Pennsylvania, data scientists say.







One day after someone allegedly attempted to shoot a member of his team, Jovan Pulitzer announced that evidence was found and confirmed of mail-in ballots with the votes already filled in by machine.







A study shows that every single time they found a bunch of votes in the middle of the night, it was always in Biden’s favor.

Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/489695105/Vote-Dumps-Report


Democrats were only able to “win” in 2020 by breaking chain of custody laws in every swing state.

Source: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/must-read-democrats-able-win-2020-breaking-chain-custody-laws-every-swing-state/

The TCF Center election fraud – Newly discovered video shows late night deliveries of tens of thousands of illegal ballots 8 hours after deadline.





Five videos – Five states where votes were switched live on TV away from President Trump to Biden.


Article on all five states: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/four-videos-four-states-votes-switched-live-tv-away-president-trump-biden/

Video from Pennsylvania: https://rumble.com/vbf6oj-video-evidence-of-voter-software-fraud-pennsylvania-pa.html

Video from Georgia: https://rumble.com/vbgf67-video-evidence-of-voter-software-fraud-georgia-ga.html

Video from Virginia: https://rumble.com/vbf56n-video-evidence-of-voter-software-fraud-virginia-va.html

Video from Wisconsin: https://rumble.com/vbf7m5-video-evidence-of-voter-software-fraud-wisconsin-wi.html

Video from Florida: https://twitter.com/thedeziner/status/1325932850278002689

Dominion owned machines removed 6% of the votes from each of 4 Windham, New Hampshire GOP candidates.









Three 300,000 Biden vote dumps late on election night in Virginia cannot be adequately explained or tied to final results.




Captured in real time: That moment in Virginia at 5:12 AM where they took 373,000 votes off the state totals


Another “glitch” – Trump loses 32,615 votes in Pennsylvania in one hour in AP totals


More “glitches” in Pennsylvania: Votes for Trump drop in three different counties simultaneously – almost as if it was coordinated


Another ‘computer glitch’ identified and corrected in Oakland County, Michigan, led to Republican winning his race


System ‘glitch’ also uncovered in Wisconsin – Reversal of swapped votes removes lead from Joe Biden


Data expert claims his team has identified enough fraudulent ballots in Georgia, Arizona, and Wisconsin to overthrow the election


San Antonio woman in Project Veritas video arrested on election-related charges.






Four months after 2020 Presidential election in Georgia, no chain of custody documents produced for 404,000 absentee ballots deposited in drop boxes; Fulton County one of 35 scofflaw counties.






March 10, 2021. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. 2 comments.

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties


Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

By Tiffany Morgan

March 4, 2021

Four months after the November 3, 2020 presidential election, state and county officials in Georgia have failed to produce chain of custody documents for an estimated 404,691 vote by mail absentee ballots deposited in drop boxes and subsequently delivered to county registrars for counting.

As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News. The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

The 2020 presidential election outcome in Georgia was decided by fewer than 12,000 votes – about three percent of the 404,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars where they were counted.

Georgia county officials have made little progress in the two months since The Star News reported on January 3 that 28 counties had provided ballot transform forms documenting 140,628 vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes.

In the two months between January 3 and March 3, 28 additional counties responded, adding ballot transfer form documentation for an additional 54,719 ballots, bringing the total vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes for which their is a chain of custody from 140,628 to 195,329.

Fulton County is one of 35 scofflaw counties in Georgia that have failed to comply with the Georgia Open Records Law and provide The Star News with absentee ballot drop box transfer forms they were required to maintain under the Emergency Rule passed by the Georgia State Election Board in July of 2020.

33 scofflaw counties simply failed to respond at all the The Star News Open Records Request:

Baldwin, Bibb, Brantley, Bryan, Chatham, Clay, Clayton, Dodge, Dooly, Evans, Franklin, Glynn, Houston, Jefferson, Johnson, Lamar, Lanier, Liberty, Long, Monroe, Muscogee, Newton, Pulaski, Richmond (Augusta), Sumter, Tift, Toombs, Troup, Turner, Union, Upson, Wayne, and Wilkes.

Two scofflaw counties responded to The Star News by saying they did not know if they had responsive documents, and would follow up when they determined if they in fact had responsive documents, but never provided that follow up or any documents.

Fulton County responded by saying they don’t know if they have documents responsive to the open records request and told The Star News they would send forms after Inauguration Day. However no documents have been provided to date.

DeKalb County told The Star News they were unsure if responsive documents existed. Then on December 17, DeKalb County provided documents that were not responsive to the Open Records Request. Instead of providing ballot transfer forms that provided chain of custody records for the movement of ballots from drop boxes to registrars, they provided documents that showed the movement of boxes of absentee ballots from registrars to centralized tabulation areas.

In December, Fulton County officials told The Star News, “We believe we can have responsive records to you by January 19, 2021. That said, should responsive materials come available sooner, we will provide them to you.”

The Star News has received no further communication from Fulton County election officials.

As The Star News reported, the Fulton County Board of Elections voted to fire Fulton County Elections Director Richard Barron last month, but the Fulton County Board of Commissioners refused to either accept or reject the decision of the Board of Elections. Barron remains in his job for the time being.

The other counties in Georgia have responded to the records request with either chain of custody documentation or other communications.

A total of 33 counties have responded by stating they did not have any drop box locations. Those counties include:

Atkinson, Ben Hill, Burke, Candler, Charlton, Chattooga, Clinch, Columbia, Dade, Effingham, Emanuel, Glascock, Greene, Habersham, Hancock, Haralson, Heard, Jenkins, Macon, Montgomery, Meriwether, Miller, Randolph, Seminole, Stewart, Taliaferro, Treutlen, Twiggs, Warren, Washington, Webster, Wilcox, Wilkinson.

An additional eight counties – Appling, Chatahoochee, Floyd, Forsyth, Gwinnett, Jeff Davis, Madison and Thomas – have told The Star News they will make their ballot transfer form records available to the public upon the payment of a processing fee.

Seventeen counties have acknowledged the open records request but have not produced documentation include Bacon, Banks, Calhoun, Camden, Dawson, Early, Grady, Henry, Irwin, Jackson, Jasper, Pickens, Putnam, Morgan, Rockdale, Taylor, and Wheeler.

One county – Laurens County – is sending forms via mail.

Six counties have ballot transfer forms but, for various reasons have not been able to deliver them to The Star News.

Hart County has said it will fax their forms, but they have not yet been received. Brooks County, Lee County and Echols County have forms held at their County Clerk’s office for retention. Jones County and Marion County have their documents kept “off-site.”

Two counties provided indeterminate responses.

Worth County told The Star News, “nothing in this chapter shall require agencies to produce records in response to a request if such records did not exist at the time of the request.”

Carroll County told The Star News it does not have “any documents responsive” to the request in their “possession or control.”

One county – Coffee – sent documents that failed to list the numbers of ballots collected at the ballot drop box locations in that county.

56 counties responded to The Star News open records request with the proper ballot transfer forms, showing that 195,309 absentee vote by mail ballots were deposited in drop boxes and then transported to the county registrar or the county registrar’s designees:

Baker totals 69
Barrow totals 2,583
Bartow totals 4,909
Berrien totals 92
Bleckley totals 89
Bulloch totals 2,256
Butts totals 481
Catoosa totals 532
Cherokee totals 17,033
Clarke totals 4,909
Cobb totals 89,860
Colquitt totals 571
Cook totals 530
Coweta totals 4,422
Crawford totals 1,519
Crisp totals 216
Decatur totals 963
Dougherty totals 3,793
Douglas totals 7,949
Elbert totals 440
Fannin totals 771
Fayette totals 6,471
Gilmer total 513
Gordon totals 1,326
Hall totals 7,565
Harris totals 1,067
Lincoln totals 513
Lowndes totals 3,266
Lumpkin totals 1,382
McDuffie totals 738
McIntosh totals 913
Mitchell totals 262
Murray totals 162
Oconee totals 3,016
Oglethorpe totals 636
Paulding totals 9,731
Peach totals 461
Pierce totals 444
Pike totals 495
Polk totals 826
Quitman totals 34
Rabun totals 1,163
Schley totals 64
Screven totals 190
Spalding totals 1,489
Stephens totals 308
Talbot totals 329
Tattnall totals 282
Telfair totals 401
Terrell totals 105
Towns totals 1,197
Walker totals 475
Walton totals 3,198
Ware totals 123
White totals 414
Whitfield totals 1,763

In December, The Star News analyzed the ballot transfer forms provided by Cobb County in response to the Open Records Request and concluded that 78 percent of the 89,860 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes in the county were not transported to the county registrar “immediately” as the Emergency Election Code Rule required.

As The Star News reported, an estimated 600,000 absentee by mail ballots were delivered by drop box in the November 3 presidential election, while an estimated 700,000 absentee ballots by mail were delivered through the United States Postal Service.

The Emergency Rule required that every county election office maintain a ballot transfer form that documented the movement of every absentee by mail ballot placed in a drop box and delivered to the county registrar prior to the election, with the number of absentee ballots picked up from each drop box, the signature of the two person team who picked up the ballots, the time of the pickup, and the time of the delivery of those ballot to the registrar, and the name of registrar who received those ballots.

A month after the 2020 general election, The Star News filed open records requests with all 159 counties requesting copies of absentee ballot transfer forms. The forms are documents used to account for absentee ballots left in drop boxes in locations across the state.

From December 3 – 11, The  Star News submitted separate Open Records Requests to all 159 counties in the state that said:

I am submitting the following Open Records Request to you today;

Please provide copies of all ballot transfer forms used in the county in the November 3 election to document the chain of custody for all absentee ballots placed in drop boxes by voters and transported to the county registrar, as required in the Election Code

Emergency Rule passed by the State Election Board on July 1, 2020. 

The Open Records Request laws in Georgia state that counties have three days to respond to the request.

According to the Prosecuting Attorneys Council of Georgia:

The Open Records Act, O.C.G.A. 50-18-70 et. seq., requires a response to an open records request within three business days pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 50-18-71(b)(1)(A).  There is no accommodation for an unavailable open records officer, so PAC recommends that there be more than one person in an agency who is capable of responding if the designated Open Records Officer is unavailable.

If the response is to deny all or part of the requested records, pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 50-18-71(d), the initial response must cite the exemption by the exact code section, subsection, and paragraph which allows the decision to not disclose the requested records. Failure to do so could result in a waiver of the exemption and a requirement of production of the records.

An agency should always strive to be transparent and provide access to public records without undue delay. However, the Open Records Act does not require an agency to engage in the creation or customization of records just to be responsive. Therefore, pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 50-18-71(j), an agency is not required to prepare a report, summary, or compilation of records or data that did not already exist at the time an open records request was made.

Now, more than 80 days after the first open records requests were issued,  37 of Georgia’s counties have failed to provide any documentation that would produce the evidence of the lawful collection and accounting for the general election’s estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes.

In all, chain of custody documents for more than two-thirds – 67.5 percent – 404, 691, of the total 600,000 votes cast via drop boxes have not been provided by county officials.

Throughout the state, approximately 300 drop boxes were used to collect absentee ballots in the November 2020 election. The drop boxes were made possible, in part, by donations to the counties from the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) – a 501 (c) (3) funded by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan.

Zuckerberg  made a $350 million donation to the CTCL 2020 election efforts. More than $24 million of CTCL funding was distributed to Fulton, Gwinnett, Cobb, and DeKalb counties alone.

The drop boxes were authorized under Georgia Election Code Emergency Rule 183-1-14-0.8-.14 approved by the State Election Board in July 2020 (but notably not approved in a statute passed by the Georgia General Assembly, which states that every absentee ballot drop box collection team “shall complete and sign a ballot transfer form upon removing the ballots from the drop box, which shall include the date, time, location and number of ballots.” 

In the wake of the controversial November election, Georgia lawmakers have moved to disallow Zuckerberg-style private funding of election administration, among other reforms.

March 4, 2021. Tags: , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

New Information — FBI Took Possession of Suspicious Ballots in Georgia in Early January and Ordered Them Destroyed With a Shredder


New Information — FBI Took Possession of Suspicious Ballots in Georgia in Early January and Ordered Them Destroyed With a Shredder

By Joe Hoft

March 3, 2021

The Gateway Pundit reported on January 9th that the FBI in Georgia stepped in and shut down the forensic analysis of shredded ballots, took the ballots away from the forensic team, and brought them back to the shredder to destroy the evidence. 

Today we have more on this incident from two sources.

This story was first reported by Patrick Byrne, the former CEO of Overstock.com.  He reported on Twitter that the Deep State was stealing evidence in Georgia related to the 2020 Election:


Patrick Byrne‏ @PatrickByrne 
Update on Georgia ballots: DHS had been trying to move forward this week. Two days ago FBI jumped in claiming jurisdiction. Yesterday 3 PM FBI took control of shredding truck and materials, directed they be returned to shredding operation and the shredding job completed.

13:46 – 9. Jan. 2021

We reported this back on January 9th.

We now have more information regarding this incident from individuals with knowledge of the events.   

This all started when a shredding company was hired to come in and shred election material.   When the truck arrived at the scene, the material asked to be shredded turned out to be ballots and other official records from the 2020 election.  The company began shredding the material into little balls which are basically impossible to piece back together once they are shredded in that manner.

After the shredder operator obtained the material to shred he noticed something unusual and eventually connected with members of the Trump team who were in Georgia at that time.  He explained the situation and brought the material to this Trump-related group.  This group of individuals who were connected to the investigation to uncover the 2020 election fraud immediately began sifting through what was not yet fully destroyed.  They reportedly found shipment transit receipts linked to China, ballots, and other sensitive information related to the 2020 election.

A local DHS investigator was also invited to review the material.  When the China information was found, the information was immediately shared with the Trump White House and the DHS in Washington DC.  One of our sources believes it was the DHS in Washington that then notified the FBI about the situation.

Within a short period of time, the local DHS investigator was pulled off the case by a very senior individual with the DHS.   Soon thereafter, the FBI showed up and ordered the investigation to be shut down.

The FBI insisted they had jurisdiction over the review of these ballots in Georgia. They took control of the shredding truck and materials and demanded the shredding operation be completed.

Fortunately, there were photos taken of some of the information found in the shredded material before the FBI ordered it destroyed.
This investigation was thwarted by the FBI.  The evidence was destroyed.

We have two sources who contributed to this report.

March 4, 2021. Tags: , , . Stop the steal, Voter fraud. 1 comment.

« Previous PageNext Page »