Idiots are protesting against the convenience store where Michael Brown stole merchandise and assaulted an employee

Before Michael Brown was shot and killed by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, this security footage from Ferguson Market and Liquor showed Brown stealing merchandise and assaulting a store employee. Skip to 1:13

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbPbX76cOVQ

Four years later, this brand new article form the St. Louis Post-Dispatch says:

“Protesters believe that the surveillance clip mischaracterized Brown.”

The protestors aren’t saying that the footage was edited, altered, or changed in any way.

Instead, they are saying that the footage mischaracterized Brown.

They are wrong. Instead, the footage shows exactly what Michael’s Brown’s character was like.

The protestors have also made the following demands of the store:

Address Michael Brown Jr.’s character.

Close the store for three days on the anniversary of his death.

Create a scholarship in his name.

Find ways to interact and give back to the community.

Stop selling Dormin, a sleeping capsule, and other items that can be misused to get high.

Retain a black-owned security company to protect the store.

The same article states:

… the store ultimately agreed to all of the requests by Wednesday, other than closing the store for three days. Instead, he said, the store would close on the anniversary of Brown’s death and provide a free barbecue the day before.

The store never did anything wrong in the first place, so there was no rational reason for the protestors to make these demands, and there was no rational reason for the store to cave in to their demands.

Here’s a photograph of people protesting against the store:




The caption under the photograph says:

“Protesters block the West Florissant Avenue entrance to Ferguson Market & Liquor as four Ferguson police officers in two police vehicles keep watch at the entrance to the market Friday, Aug. 17, 2018. Photo by David Carson”

August 27, 2018. Tags: , , , , , , , . Political correctness, Racism, Social justice warriors. 2 comments.

Woman who is allergic to grass could get 20 years in prison for not having grass in her yard

Janice Duffner lives in St. Peters, Missouri, where she owns a house. Because she is allergic to grass, she does not have any in her yard. She does have other plants, which she is not allergic to. The Kansas City Star published this photograph of her yard:




Six years after Ms. Duffner bought her house, the city passed a law that requires all houses to have grass in their yard. After Ms. Duffner told the city that she was allergic to grass, the city threatened her with 20 years in prison and fines totaling $180,000 if she does not comply.

U.S. District Judge John A. Ross recently ruled against Ms. Duffner. Ms. Duffner plans to appeal this ruling. I hope she wins.

 

April 2, 2018. Tags: , , , , , , , , , . Police state. Leave a comment.