Where in the world did Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez get the idea that three people (as opposed to one) were killed at the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia?

This is a link to a tweet by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

And this is a link to an archive of the tweet.

Here’s a screen capture of the tweet:



The tweet states (the bolding is mine):

You were forced out of the Trump Admin for saying white supremacists were “not the problem” days before Neo-Nazis in Charlottesville killed 3 people.

Pretty sure we’re on the right side of history if you’re my opposition.

This is not about atrocity. It’s about how we get there.

Three people?

Where did Ocasio-Cortez get the idea that three people were killed at that event?

The Washington Post, the New York Times, Associated Press, Reuters, NPR, PBS, ABC, NBC, CBS, and CNN all reported that the death toll was one, and that the name of that person is Heather Heyer.

Where exactly does Ocasio-Cortez get her news from?

Of course, this is not nearly first time that I have reported on Ocasio-Cortez being ignorant of commonly known, basic facts that have been widely reported in the news.

She doesn’t know that the judiciary is one of the three branches of the federal government.

She thinks the U.S. has 500 million people.

She thinks there is no upper-middle class in America.

She thinks you’ll never need a funeral if we adopt single payer health care.

She doesn’t know the difference between the defense budget and a one year increase in the defense budget.

She thinks the unemployment rate distinguishes between people who have one job and people who have two jobs.

She thinks the Constitutional requirement for the President to be at least 35 years old only applies to men.

Anyone who regularly reads mainstream news sources would know the true facts about all of those things.

So I really do wonder where it is that Ocasio-Cortez gets her news from.

December 30, 2018. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Politics. 4 comments.

Hey Obama – why couldn’t a Republican President delay all of Obamacare for 10,000 years?

As the Obamacare law is written, the employer mandate is to begin in January 2014. This is what the law said when it was passed by the House and Senate, and signed by President Obama in 2010.

However, it has been reported that President Obama has just delayed the employer mandate part of Obamacare until January 2015. Obama did this without approval from Congress.

For Obama to change a law that was passed by Congress, without first getting approval from Congress, is a violation of the Presidential oath that Obama took to uphold and defend the Constitution.

What Obama did here is an action of a dictator, not an action of a President whose power is limited by a written constitution.

If Obama can get away with this, then it sets a horribly dangerous precedent, and means that the President can arbitrarily make any change to any law that has been passed by Congress, without first getting approval from Congress.

That being said, I would like Obama to explain why a Republican President could not delay all of Obamacare for 10,000 years. It was Obama himself who delayed part of Obamacare for one year. If Obama can do this, I would love to hear him explain why a Republican President could not delay all of Obamacare for 10,000 years.

July 6, 2013. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , . Barack Obama, Health care, Politics. Leave a comment.

Obama has illegally bypassed Congress to delay Obamacare’s employer mandate

As the Obamacare law is written, the employer mandate is to begin in January 2014. This is what the law said when it was passed by the House and Senate, and signed by President Obama in 2010.

However, it has been reported that President Obama has just delayed the employer mandate part of Obamacare until January 2015. Obama did this without approval from Congress.

For Obama to change a law that was passed by Congress, without first getting approval from Congress, is a violation of the Presidential oath that Obama took to uphold and defend the Constitution.

What Obama did here is an action of a dictator, not an action of a President whose power is limited by a written constitution.

If Obama can get away with this, then it sets a horribly dangerous precedent, and means that the President can arbitrarily make any change to any law that has been passed by Congress, without first getting approval from Congress.

July 3, 2013. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , . Barack Obama, Health care, Police state, Politics. 1 comment.