Here’s proof that the Washington Post, CNN, NPR, Politico, and MSNBC all lied about Hunter Biden’s laptop before the election, in order to help Joe Biden get elected. After the election, all of them finally admitted the truth.

By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)

December 19, 2020

The New York Post was founded by Alexander Hamilton in 1801.

On October 14, 2020, it published an article titled:

“Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad”

Original: https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/

Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20201014115516/https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/

Before the election, the mainstream media repeatedly claimed that the New York Post article was bogus.

But after the election, the mainstream media admitted that the article was true.

Here are some headlines that show how the mainstream media lied about this before the election, in order to help Joe Biden get elected. I’m also including headlines from the mainstream media from after the election, where they finally admitted the truth.

Washington Post, October 14, 2020:

“Hunter Biden’s alleged laptop: An explainer”

Original: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/10/14/hunter-bidens-alleged-laptop-an-explainer/

Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20201015142630if_/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/10/14/hunter-bidens-alleged-laptop-an-explainer/

Washington Post, October 15, 2020:

“Trump’s fake new Biden scandal has a deeper purpose. Bannon revealed it.”

Original: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/10/15/trumps-fake-new-biden-scandal-has-deeper-purpose-bannon-revealed-it/

Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20201016060802if_/https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/10/15/trumps-fake-new-biden-scandal-has-deeper-purpose-bannon-revealed-it/

Washington Post, October 16, 2020

“The truth behind the Hunter Biden non-scandal”

Original: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-truth-behind-the-hunter-biden-non-scandal/2020/10/16/798210bc-0fd1-11eb-8074-0e943a91bf08_story.html

Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20201016205622/https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-truth-behind-the-hunter-biden-non-scandal/2020/10/16/798210bc-0fd1-11eb-8074-0e943a91bf08_story.html

Washington Post, December 9, 2020:

“Hunter Biden confirms he is under federal investigation”

Original: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/hunter-biden-under-federal-investigation/2020/12/09/3b7361be-3a64-11eb-9276-ae0ca72729be_story.html

Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20201210001146/https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/hunter-biden-under-federal-investigation/2020/12/09/3b7361be-3a64-11eb-9276-ae0ca72729be_story.html

Christiane Amanpour on CNN, October 22, 2020:

“I’m a journalist and a reporter and I follow the facts. And there has never been any issues in terms of corruption.”

Original: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/2010/22/ampr.01.html

Archive: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:aM-haqNEmvsJ:transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/2010/22/ampr.01.html+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

And because this one was on CNN, here’s the video of it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSB_fQHbSiA

CNN, December 10, 2020:

“Federal criminal investigation into Hunter Biden focuses on his business dealings in China”

Original: https://edition.cnn.com/2020/12/09/politics/hunter-biden-tax-investigtation/index.html

Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20201210002222/https://edition.cnn.com/2020/12/09/politics/hunter-biden-tax-investigtation/index.html

NPR, October 22, 2020:

“Why haven’t you seen any stories from NPR about the NY Post’s Hunter Biden story? We don’t want to waste our time on stories that are not really stories, and we don’t want to waste the listeners’ and readers’ time on stories that are just pure distractions.”

Original: https://twitter.com/NPRpubliceditor/status/1319281101223940096

Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20201022143539/https://twitter.com/NPRpubliceditor/status/1319281101223940096

NPR, December 9, 2020:

“Hunter Biden Says He Is Under Federal Investigation For Tax Matter”

Original: https://www.npr.org/sections/biden-transition-updates/2020/12/09/944751413/bidens-son-under-federal-investigation-for-tax-matter

Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20201214213302/https://www.npr.org/sections/biden-transition-updates/2020/12/09/944751413/bidens-son-under-federal-investigation-for-tax-matter

Politico, October 19, 2020:

“Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say”

Original: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-russian-disinfo-430276

Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20201211035333/https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-russian-disinfo-430276

Politico, December 9, 2020:

“Justice Department’s interest in Hunter Biden covered more than taxes”

Original: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/09/justice-department-interest-hunter-biden-taxes-444139

Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20201211165256/https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/09/justice-department-interest-hunter-biden-taxes-444139

MSNBC, October 18, 2020:

“Hunter Biden story an ‘obvious Russian plot’ McFaul believes”

Original: https://www.msnbc.com/am-joy/watch/hunter-biden-story-an-obvious-russian-plot-mcfaul-believes-94104133512

Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20201108092058if_/https://www.msnbc.com/am-joy/watch/hunter-biden-story-an-obvious-russian-plot-mcfaul-believes-94104133512

MSNBC, December 9, 2020:

“DOJ reportedly probing Hunter Biden after Trump called for Biden probe”

Original: https://www.msnbc.com/the-beat-with-ari/watch/doj-reportedly-probing-hunter-biden-after-trump-called-for-biden-probe-97431109778

Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20201210002307if_/https://www.msnbc.com/the-beat-with-ari/watch/doj-reportedly-probing-hunter-biden-after-trump-called-for-biden-probe-97431109778

December 19, 2020. Tags: , , , , , , , , . Joe Biden, Media bias. Leave a comment.

Dershowitz: ‘Not Fair’ Big Tech Companies Can Censor Users and Have Immunity

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2020/12/13/dershowitz-not-fair-big-tech-companies-can-censor-users-and-have-immunity/

Dershowitz: ‘Not Fair’ Big Tech Companies Can Censor Users and Have Immunity

By Trent Baker

December 13, 2020

During Sunday’s broadcast of New York WABC 770 AM radio’s “The Cats Roundtable,” Harvard Law School professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz took aim at big tech companies like Twitter and Facebook for censoring users on their platforms.

Dershowitz said the social media giants are acting as platforms while also acting as publishers, which he said is “not fair” because they have both censorship and immunity.

“Facebook says we don’t like this, and Twitter says we don’t like attacks on Hunter Biden. And once you act as a publisher, you’re a publisher. You know what it means — I mean, you are a publisher. And you can be sued because you’re a publisher,” Dershowitz told host John Catsimatidis. “But they are platforms. They can’t be platforms at the same time and act like publishers. They should have to check a box: If you’re going to be a platform, no censorship. If you’re not going to be a platform, then you don’t get immunity. But you can’t both have censorship and get immunity at the same time. That’s just not fair and not right.”

He added, “I think we’re going to see a revision of [Section] 230. We’re also seeing anti-trust cases now against Facebook and others. Look, this is the hardest question under the First Amendment in the 21st-century — is how to deal with these giant social media that have such an enormous impact, are not regulated … on the other hand, we can’t just let them be immune from the law. They are not above the law either.”

December 14, 2020. Tags: , , , , , , , . Media bias. Leave a comment.

CNN on Hunter Biden’s laptop before the election: “There has never been any issues in terms of corruption.” CNN after the election: “Federal criminal investigation into Hunter Biden focuses on his business dealings in China.”

CNN on Hunter Biden’s laptop before the election:

“There has never been any issues in terms of corruption.”

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSB_fQHbSiA

CNN after the election:

“Federal criminal investigation into Hunter Biden focuses on his business dealings in China.”

Source: https://edition.cnn.com/2020/12/09/politics/hunter-biden-tax-investigtation/index.html

December 12, 2020. Tags: , , , , . Joe Biden, Media bias. 1 comment.

NPR before the election: “Why haven’t you seen any stories from NPR about the NY Post’s Hunter Biden story? We don’t want to waste our time on stories that are not really stories, and we don’t want to waste the listeners’ and readers’ time on stories that are just pure distractions.”

NPR before the election:

“Why haven’t you seen any stories from NPR about the NY Post’s Hunter Biden story? We don’t want to waste our time on stories that are not really stories, and we don’t want to waste the listeners’ and readers’ time on stories that are just pure distractions.”

Original: https://twitter.com/NPRpubliceditor/status/1319281101223940096

Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20201022143539/https://twitter.com/NPRpubliceditor/status/1319281101223940096

December 11, 2020. Tags: , , , , . Joe Biden, Media bias. Leave a comment.

Politico before the election: “Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say.” Politico after the election: “Justice Department’s interest in Hunter Biden covered more than taxes.”

Politico before the election:

“Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say”

Original: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-russian-disinfo-430276

Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20201211035333/https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-russian-disinfo-430276

Politico after the election:

“Justice Department’s interest in Hunter Biden covered more than taxes.”

Original: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/09/justice-department-interest-hunter-biden-taxes-444139

Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20201211165256/https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/09/justice-department-interest-hunter-biden-taxes-444139

December 11, 2020. Tags: , , , , , , . Joe Biden, Media bias. Leave a comment.

YouTuber Styxhexenhammer666: Youtube to Remove Videos Critical of Beijing Biden “Winning” Election (My Most Important Video Ever)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4h9x6DSJwX0

December 9, 2020. Tags: , , , , , , . Media bias, Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

ABC News, November 3, 2020, 11:34 P.M: “The election department sent the ballot counters at the State Farm Arena in Atlanta home at 10:30 p.m.” But later, a video came out which showed them counting ballots in the middle of that same night. Then, on December 4, 2020, the Washington Post said, “No one told observers they had to leave.” This is exactly like in George Orwell’s 1984!

On November 3, 2020, at 11:34 P.M., ABC News reported:

“The election department sent the ballot counters at the State Farm Arena in Atlanta home at 10:30 p.m.”

Original source: https://twitter.com/abcpolitics/status/1323846118208376834

Archived source: https://web.archive.org/web/20201104043502/https://twitter.com/abcpolitics/status/1323846118208376834

But later, this video came out, which shows that a few people had stayed behind, and continued counting ballots well into the middle of the night:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keANzinHWUA

Now, the media is going full Orwell, and claiming that no one was ever sent home.

On December 4, 2020, the Washington Post wrote:

“No one told observers they had to leave”

I’m not stupid. And my memory is not anywhere nearly that short.

I know how to spot when the media is trying to rewrite history.

December 7, 2020. Tags: , , , , , . Media bias, Stop the steal, Voter fraud. 2 comments.

Why is mainstream media and Big Tech blocking an old CNN report on Smartmatic?

https://noqreport.com/2020/12/02/why-is-mainstream-media-and-big-tech-blocking-an-old-cnn-report-on-smartmatic/

Why is mainstream media and Big Tech blocking an old CNN report on Smartmatic?

You can’t find the report on CNN’s website. If you try to upload it anywhere, they quickly flag it for removal. As the saying goes, when you’re taking flak you know you’re over the target.

By Scott Boyd

December 2, 2020

A report by CNN from 2006 details very obvious voter fraud perpetrated by the government of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez using Smartmatic Voting Systems. But you can’t find the video on CNN’s website. You can’t find it on their YouTube channel or Facebook. You can’t even find it in their archives. The story and the video have been scrubbed completely.

They’ve taken it a step further than usual. Anyone who tries to post the video to Twitter, Facebook, or YouTube finds their post is quickly censored. CNN is actively trying to prevent anyone from seeing their own reporting from back in the days when they still pretended to do real journalism. It was a very good exposé that drew the conclusions regarding Chavez. Let’s see if those conclusions sound familiar…

During his last election, Chavez was losing badly on election night. But miraculously overnight he was able to reverse the course of the election and declare victory. Votes magically appeared for him in the early morning hours following election night that pulled him from the abyss into the winner’s circle. The resemblance to what happened in Venezuela a decade and a half ago is strikingly similar to what happened in the United States on election night and the early morning hours the next day.

Contrary to a plethora of fact-checks that claim there is no connection between Smartmatic and Dominion Voting Systems, the company at the heart of voter fraud allegations in the United States, the truth is this. Smartmatic bought Sequoia Voting Systems in 2005. Dominion purchased parts of Sequoia in 2010, including components and software from Smartmatic that are still used by Dominion today.

There is a small labyrinth of shell companies and subsidiaries used by fact-checkers to justify their “debunkings” about the connections, but it’s real. For example, one mainstream media fact-checker claimed that since Smartmatic technically bought Sequoia through their Florida subsidiary, Smartmatic Florida, to circumvent federal government scrutiny, TECHNICALLY it wasn’t Smartmatic who was directly connected to the sale of their equipment and software to Dominion. Seriously, folks, that’s how they justify their “false” labels on “fact-checks.”

We often see on the internet videos labeled, “They don’t want you to see this!!!” Usually, it’s some silly theory or meaningless bit of old news. With this CNN video, they truly, vehemently do not want you to see it.

December 2, 2020. Tags: , , , , , . Media bias, Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Here’s what the mainstream media doesn’t want you to know about Trump’s $3 million recount of Wisconsin that ended up increasing Biden’s lead by 87 votes

The mainstream media has been reporting – truthfully – that Trump spent $3 million for a recount of Wisconsin, which ended up increasing Biden’s lead by 87 votes.

However, in this video, Dr. Steve Turley claims that there is more to the recount.

He says that:

1) Wisconsin law requires recounts to include an audit of the votes as part of any recount.

2) Wisconsin Democrats tried (and failed) to remove this audit from the current recount.

3) The audit exposed hundreds of thousands of illegal mail in ballots, because Wisconsin law requires a written request to send someone a mail in ballot, but these illegal mail in ballots were sent out without such a written request.

4) The mainstream media that reported on Trump’s recount increasing Biden’s margin of victory deliberately left out these three things, because they do not want people to know that the Democrats stole Wisconsin.

I don’t know if Dr. Steve Turley is right or not. But if he is right, then it proves that the mainstream media has failed to do its job.

Skip to 2:57

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JjaQ-3masc

December 2, 2020. Tags: , , , , , . Media bias, Stop the steal, Voter fraud. Leave a comment.

Here’s why it was legal to release Hunter Biden’s emails, but illegal to release Donald Trump’s tax returns


By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)

October 20, 2020

Rudy Giuliani has named the person who showed him Hunter Biden’s laptop. His name is John Paul Mac Isaac.

Source: https://www.delawareonline.com/story/news/2020/10/14/meet-wilmington-repairman-who-reportedly-gave-biden-laptop-giuliani-associate/3655753001/

By comparison, the New York Times never named the person who gave them Donald Trump’s tax returns.

Hunter Biden’s laptop became the legal property of the repair shop 90 days after he abandoned it. He ignored multiple requests from the store to pick it up.

Source: https://sonar21.com/yes-the-hunter-biden-emails-are-authentic/

By comparison, whoever leaked Trump’s tax returns committed a crime.

Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/6103

If the New York Times was only going to publish one of these two things, it should have been the info on Biden, not Trump, because the Biden info is the one that was legally given out.

October 20, 2020. Tags: , , , , . Donald Trump, Joe Biden, Media bias. Leave a comment.

KDKA TV (Pittsburgh) said people should call the police if they can identify the “civil” protestors who committed assault and theft. KDKA also says it muted their “civil” profanity. KDKA also falsely said restaurant patrons “clashed” with protestors.

By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)

September 8, 2020

Let’s count the lies in this video of KDKA reporting on Black Lives Matter protestors in Pittsburgh:

1) Hitting someone on the head with a skateboard is not “civil.”

2) Stealing and then drinking the beverage of a restaurant customer is not “civil.”

3) There’s no need to mute language that is “civil.”

4) The restaurant patrons were just sitting there, minding their own business, They did not “clash” with anyone.

This last thing is not a lie, but it is an omission by KDKA: The guy on the bike was acting in self defense when he pushed the bullhorn away from his face. Sound that loud, that close to your ears, can cause hearing damage. The guy with the bullhorn was the aggressor, not the guy on the bike.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wP1JU8aZJ54

September 8, 2020. Tags: , , , , , , . Black lives matter, Media bias, Pittsburgh, Social justice warriors. 1 comment.

Bari Weiss on why she left the New York Times

https://nypost.com/2020/07/14/bari-weiss-on-why-she-left-the-new-york-times/

Bari Weiss on why she left the New York Times

By Bari Weiss

July 14, 2020

Dear A.G.,

It is with sadness that I write to tell you that I am resigning from The New York Times.

I joined the paper with gratitude and optimism three years ago. I was hired with the goal of bringing in voices that would not otherwise appear in your pages: first-time writers, centrists, conservatives and others who would not naturally think of The Times as their home. The reason for this effort was clear: The paper’s failure to anticipate the outcome of the 2016 election meant that it didn’t have a firm grasp of the country it covers. Dean Baquet and others have admitted as much on various occasions. The priority in Opinion was to help redress that critical shortcoming.

I was honored to be part of that effort, led by James Bennet. I am proud of my work as a writer and as an editor. Among those I helped bring to our pages: the Venezuelan dissident Wuilly Arteaga; the Iranian chess champion Dorsa Derakhshani; and the Hong Kong Christian democrat Derek Lam. Also: Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Masih Alinejad, Zaina Arafat, Elna Baker, Rachael Denhollander, Matti Friedman, Nick Gillespie, Heather Heying, Randall Kennedy, Julius Krein, Monica Lewinsky, Glenn Loury, Jesse Singal, Ali Soufan, Chloe Valdary, Thomas Chatterton Williams, Wesley Yang, and many others.

But the lessons that ought to have followed the election — lessons about the importance of understanding other Americans, the necessity of resisting tribalism, and the centrality of the free exchange of ideas to a democratic society — have not been learned. Instead, a new consensus has emerged in the press, but perhaps especially at this paper: that truth isn’t a process of collective discovery, but an orthodoxy already known to an enlightened few whose job is to inform everyone else.

Twitter is not on the masthead of The New York Times. But Twitter has become its ultimate editor. As the ethics and mores of that platform have become those of the paper, the paper itself has increasingly become a kind of performance space. Stories are chosen and told in a way to satisfy the narrowest of audiences, rather than to allow a curious public to read about the world and then draw their own conclusions. I was always taught that journalists were charged with writing the first rough draft of history. Now, history itself is one more ephemeral thing molded to fit the needs of a predetermined narrative.

My own forays into Wrongthink have made me the subject of constant bullying by colleagues who disagree with my views. They have called me a Nazi and a racist; I have learned to brush off comments about how I’m “writing about the Jews again.” Several colleagues perceived to be friendly with me were badgered by coworkers. My work and my character are openly demeaned on company-wide Slack channels where masthead editors regularly weigh in. There, some coworkers insist I need to be rooted out if this company is to be a truly “inclusive” one, while others post ax emojis next to my name. Still other New York Times employees publicly smear me as a liar and a bigot on Twitter with no fear that harassing me will be met with appropriate action. They never are.

There are terms for all of this: unlawful discrimination, hostile work environment, and constructive discharge. I’m no legal expert. But I know that this is wrong.

I do not understand how you have allowed this kind of behavior to go on inside your company in full view of the paper’s entire staff and the public. And I certainly can’t square how you and other Times leaders have stood by while simultaneously praising me in private for my courage. Showing up for work as a centrist at an American newspaper should not require bravery.

Part of me wishes I could say that my experience was unique. But the truth is that intellectual curiosity — let alone risk-taking — is now a liability at The Times. Why edit something challenging to our readers, or write something bold only to go through the numbing process of making it ideologically kosher, when we can assure ourselves of job security (and clicks) by publishing our 4000th op-ed arguing that Donald Trump is a unique danger to the country and the world? And so self-censorship has become the norm.

What rules that remain at The Times are applied with extreme selectivity. If a person’s ideology is in keeping with the new orthodoxy, they and their work remain unscrutinized. Everyone else lives in fear of the digital thunderdome. Online venom is excused so long as it is directed at the proper targets.

Op-eds that would have easily been published just two years ago would now get an editor or a writer in serious trouble, if not fired. If a piece is perceived as likely to inspire backlash internally or on social media, the editor or writer avoids pitching it.

If she feels strongly enough to suggest it, she is quickly steered to safer ground. And if, every now and then, she succeeds in getting a piece published that does not explicitly promote progressive causes, it happens only after every line is carefully massaged, negotiated and caveated.

It took the paper two days and two jobs to say that the Tom Cotton op-ed “fell short of our standards.” We attached an editor’s note on a travel story about Jaffa shortly after it was published because it “failed to touch on important aspects of Jaffa’s makeup and its history.” But there is still none appended to Cheryl Strayed’s fawning interview with the writer Alice Walker, a proud anti-Semite who believes in lizard Illuminati.

The paper of record is, more and more, the record of those living in a distant galaxy, one whose concerns are profoundly removed from the lives of most people. This is a galaxy in which, to choose just a few recent examples, the Soviet space program is lauded for its “diversity”; the doxxing of teenagers in the name of justice is condoned; and the worst caste systems in human history includes the United States alongside Nazi Germany.

Even now, I am confident that most people at The Times do not hold these views. Yet they are cowed by those who do. Why? Perhaps because they believe the ultimate goal is righteous. Perhaps because they believe that they will be granted protection if they nod along as the coin of our realm — language — is degraded in service to an ever-shifting laundry list of right causes. Perhaps because there are millions of unemployed people in this country and they feel lucky to have a job in a contracting industry.

Or perhaps it is because they know that, nowadays, standing up for principle at the paper does not win plaudits. It puts a target on your back. Too wise to post on Slack, they write to me privately about the “new McCarthyism” that has taken root at the paper of record.

All this bodes ill, especially for independent-minded young writers and editors paying close attention to what they’ll have to do to advance in their careers. Rule One: Speak your mind at your own peril. Rule Two: Never risk commissioning a story that goes against the narrative. Rule Three: Never believe an editor or publisher who urges you to go against the grain. Eventually, the publisher will cave to the mob, the editor will get fired or reassigned, and you’ll be hung out to dry.

For these young writers and editors, there is one consolation. As places like The Times and other once-great journalistic institutions betray their standards and lose sight of their principles, Americans still hunger for news that is accurate, opinions that are vital, and debate that is sincere. I hear from these people every day. “An independent press is not a liberal ideal or a progressive ideal or a democratic ideal. It’s an American ideal,” you said a few years ago. I couldn’t agree more. America is a great country that deserves a great newspaper.

None of this means that some of the most talented journalists in the world don’t still labor for this newspaper. They do, which is what makes the illiberal environment especially heartbreaking. I will be, as ever, a dedicated reader of their work. But I can no longer do the work that you brought me here to do — the work that Adolph Ochs described in that famous 1896 statement: “to make of the columns of The New York Times a forum for the consideration of all questions of public importance, and to that end to invite intelligent discussion from all shades of opinion.”

Ochs’s idea is one of the best I’ve encountered. And I’ve always comforted myself with the notion that the best ideas win out. But ideas cannot win on their own. They need a voice. They need a hearing. Above all, they must be backed by people willing to live by them.

Sincerely,
Bari

July 16, 2020. Tags: , , , . Cancel culture, Media bias. Leave a comment.

One of the biggest examples yet of why the lockdown is a scam! NBC News “medical expert” Dr. Joseph Fair appeared on air nearly a dozen times to document his “struggle” with COVID-19. But later, he admitted that he never actually had COVID-19! From the very start, every single one of his COVID-19 tests was negative! Here are some of NBC’s bogus, con-game videos for you to watch!

By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)

July 10, 2020

I’ll definitely be adding this one to my list the next time I update it. My current list can be read at Here are 167 reasons why I’m against the COVID-19 lockdowns

This is just too funny!

This is one of the biggest and best examples of the media bias that is being used to exaggerate the problem of COVID-19.

NBC News “medical expert” Dr. Joseph Fair appeared on air nearly a dozen times to document his “struggle” with COVID-19.

But later, he admitted that he never actually had COVID-19!

From the very start, every single one of his COVID-19 tests was negative!

Here’s a picture of Dr. Fair from one of his reports. I got this image from the following link, which also has a great article about how NBC pulled off their huge con:

https://freebeacon.com/media/nbc-contributor-reveals-he-never-had-coronavirus-after-network-documented-his-recovery/

Here are some of the videos of NBC’s con that aired on the network:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWRVXxTdgYs

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjZbSHv6lws

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=of4RlbgUbEc

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyizJh3–5o

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_tupmKGy0c

 

July 10, 2020. Tags: , , , , . COVID-19, Media bias. 3 comments.

According to NPR, this video from Louisville, Kentucky is a “right-wing extremist” attack

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpZ1D0Ylbsk

https://www.npr.org/2020/06/21/880963592/vehicle-attacks-rise-as-extremists-target-protesters

Vehicle Attacks Rise As Extremists Target Protesters

June 21, 2020

Right-wing extremists are turning cars into weapons

July 9, 2020. Tags: , , , , , , , . Black lives matter, Idiots blocking traffic, Media bias, Social justice warriors. Leave a comment.

Comedy writer permanently banned from Twitter for saying “men aren’t women”

https://disrn.com/news/comedy-writer-banned-from-twitter-for-saying-men-arent-women/

Comedy writer permanently banned from Twitter for saying “men aren’t women”

By Adam Ford

June 28, 2020

Irish comedy writer Graham Linehan has been permanently banned from Twitter after he tweeted “men aren’t women tho” in response to a tweet by a women’s group wishing men who identify as women a happy Pride Month.

Lineman, who had hundreds of thousands of followers on the social network, is the creator or co-creator of the sitcoms Father Ted, Black Books, and The IT Crowd.

Twitter said Linehan “has been permanently suspended after repeated violations of our rules against hateful conduct and platform manipulation.”

June 29, 2020. Tags: , , , , , , , , . Cancel culture, LGBT, Media bias, Political correctness, Social justice warriors. Leave a comment.

I created an account at Parler. It’s like Twitter, except they support free speech.

I created an account at Parler. It’s like Twitter, except they support free speech.

Here’s my account: https://parler.com/profile/DanFromSquirrelHill/posts

June 28, 2020. Tags: , , . Media bias. Leave a comment.

The Guardian falsely wrote: “a protester was shot as he tried to bring down conquistador statue.” Wrong! The guy who got shot in Albuquerque was not “trying to bring down a statue.” He was trying to murder someone. So the guy shot him in self defense.

By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)

June 17, 2020

This incident recently happened in Albuquerque.

The Guardian just published this article, which has the following headline and subheadline: (the bolding is mine)

“Armed vigilantes under scrutiny after statue protester shot in New Mexico”

“Armed militia members were out in force at demonstration when a protester was shot as he tried to bring down conquistador statue”

The article states:

“Steven Ray Baca, 31, shot a protester as he and others attempted to bring down a statue”

That’s not what happened.

The guy who got shot was not “trying to bring down a statue.”

Instead, the guy who got shot was trying to commit murder.

The shooting was self defense.

The shooter had just been assaulted by several members of Antifa. They beat him. They hit him with a skateboard. They knocked him down to the ground. And they verbally threatened to kill him.

Here’s a video which shows them attacking him. And then he shoots one of them in self defense:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjNSvexSLoQ

It’s very clear that the shooting was in self defense.

And it’s also very clear that the person who got shot was not “trying to bring down a statue.”

Note from Daniel Alman: If you like this blog post that I wrote, you can buy my books from amazon, and/or donate to me via PayPal, using the links below:

amazon logo

Note from Daniel Alman: I’d like to recommend that you visit Whatfinger News. It’s a really awesome website.

June 17, 2020. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , . Antifa, Guns, Media bias, Social justice warriors. 5 comments.

Twitter banned Trump’s video tribute to George Floyd. Here’s the same video at YouTube.

President Trump put this four minute video tribute to George Floyd up at Twitter, but Twitter deleted it.

Here’s the same video at YouTube:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0P40rSPTRKI

June 5, 2020. Tags: , , , , . Donald Trump, Media bias, Racism. 2 comments.

Former ESPN NBA reporter Chris Palmer praised protesters for burning down 189 units of affordable housing. But later, when protestors came to his own neighborhood, he got really scared.

By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)

May 31, 2020

Chris Palmer is a former ESPN NBA reporter.

He praised protesters for burning down 189 units of affordable housing.

But later, when protestors came to his own neighborhood, he got really scared.

Here’s a screenshot of his hypocritical tweets. You can see a bigger version of the image at this link: https://i.redd.it/szbv1kn485251.jpg

In the first tweet, Palmer shows a photograph of 189 units of affordable housing that was burned down by protestors. Palmer praised the protestors with the following words:

“Burn that shit down. Burn it all down.”

However, very soon afterwards, Palmer made two tweets where he complained about protestors coming to his own neighborhood.

In the first of those two tweets, he said:

“They just attacked our sister community down the street. It’s a gated community and they tried to climb the gates. They had to beat them back. Then destroyed a Starbucks and are now in front of my building. Get these animals TF out of my neighborhood. Go back to where you live.”

In the second of those two tweets, he said:

“Welp. They’re gone. Security called the cops and they swarmed. Some scattered, others were arrested. (You hate to see it.) Tense moments. There’s graffiti everywhere. We live in a beautiful, safe community and have pride. These people had no pride and weren’t protestors.”

Palmer’s hypocrisy is some of the worst that I have ever seen.

Note from Daniel Alman: If you like this blog post that I wrote, you can buy my books from amazon, and/or donate to me via PayPal, using the links below:

amazon logo

Note from Daniel Alman: I’d like to recommend that you visit Whatfinger News. It’s a really awesome website.

May 31, 2020. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , . Media bias, Rioting looting and arson, Social justice warriors. 1 comment.

CNN reporter Kaitlan Collins caught removing face mask when she thought camera was off

https://nypost.com/2020/05/16/cnn-reporter-caught-removing-face-mask-when-she-thought-camera-was-off/

CNN reporter Kaitlan Collins caught removing face mask when she thought camera was off

May 16, 2020

Masks for thee but not for me.

CNN White House correspondent Kaitlan Collins may have worn her mask during the White House press briefing Friday, but she promptly removed the facial covering when the cameras were off — or so she thought.

Video percolating on Twitter shows shortly after White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany finished her briefing, Collins removed her face mask which she had worn during the televised event.

May 18, 2020. Tags: , , , . COVID-19, Media bias. 1 comment.

Video Allegedly Shows That Once The Cameras Are Off Reporters Remove Their Masks And Don’t Follow Social Distancing Rules

https://www.rightjournalism.com/video-allegedly-shows-that-once-the-cameras-are-off-reporters-remove-their-masks-and-dont-follow-social-distancing-rules/

Video Allegedly Shows That Once The Cameras Are Off Reporters Remove Their Masks And Don’t Follow Social Distancing Rules

May 12, 2020

The U.S. debate over restrictions for fighting the coronavirus intensified in the last few weeks, as protesters labeled mandatory lockdowns as “tyranny,” while medical workers and health experts cautioned that lifting them too soon risked unleashing a greater disaster.

We’ve seen it happen time and again: clambering for attention in our click-driven world, major news outlets cherry-pick sensational stories and dramatize their headlines. This tactic has blown countless news stories out of proportion and COVID-19 isn’t one of them.

Americans are skeptical of the news media. A recent Gallup Poll shows that 55% of Americans disapprove of the way the media have handled the coronavirus coverage — that’s a higher disapproval rating than Congress, which is saying a lot.

And the public’s response to the coronavirus pandemic reveals its distrust.

And we can now tell why Americans don’t trust the mainstream media.

A recent video that surfaced on Twitter shows plenty of mainstream media reporters that removes their masks as the cameras are turned off.

Video below:

So once the cameras are off the virus is not as dangerous and reporters remove their masks, and ask for the common people to follow the guidelines.

Please share this article wherever you can. It is the only way we can work around their censorship and ensure people receive news about issues that the mainstream media suppress.

May 12, 2020. Tags: , , . COVID-19, Media bias. Leave a comment.

Hypocrite New York Times writer Taylor Lorenz wants to shut down other people’s jobs, but not her own.

Taylor Lorenz is a writer for the New York Times.

On May 2, 2020, she made the following tweet, but deleted it soon afterward, because she could not handle the fact that other people disagreed with her. Fortunately, the Internet Archive saved a copy of her tweet before she deleted it.

This is the original link to her (deleted) tweet: https://twitter.com/taylorlorenz/status/1256761280150593537

And this is the link to the archived version of her tweet: https://web.archive.org/web/20200503014927/https:/twitter.com/taylorlorenz/status/1256761280150593537

This is the text of her tweet:

The “open up the economy” people are truly the dumbest ppl on here. How do they think the economy will look when millions are dead and our hospitals are overwhelmed? If u want to “save the economy” then u need to keep everyone *alive.*

Here is a screenshot of her tweet:

Taylor Lorenz has a job.

She gets a paycheck.

She uses that paycheck to pay for food, housing, etc.

But she is against other people having a job.

She is against other people getting a paycheck.

She is against other people using a paycheck to pay for food, housing, etc.

What a hypocrite!

May 3, 2020. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , . COVID-19, Media bias. Leave a comment.

The irresponsible, biased, and scaremonger mainstream media has been dishonestly and grossly overstating the death rate of COVID-19 in order to try to justify totalitarian lockdowns and economic destruction. Here are examples of doctors and scientists showing that the real COVID-19 death rate is far, far lower than what the mainstream media has been saying.

By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)

April 23, 2020

On March 30, 2020, I wrote:

It’s possible that the number of people in the U.S. who are infected with COVID-19 is much bigger than the number that is being currently reported, but many of those people haven’t gotten substantially sick, and so haven’t gotten tested.

The death rate is calculated by dividing the number of people who die by the number who get infected.

But while we do have accurate information about the numerator, we really have no idea what the denominator is. It’s possible that the real denominator is magnitudes bigger than what is being reported, because most infected people have either no symptoms or minor symptoms, and thus, don’t get tested. If this is indeed the case, then it’s possible that the real death rate is far, far lower than the one that is being reported.

It turns out that I was right.

The irresponsible, biased, and scaremonger mainstream media has been dishonestly and grossly overstating the death rate of COVID-19 in order to try to justify totalitarian lockdowns and economic destruction.

Here are examples of doctors and scientists showing that the real COVID-19 death rate is far, far lower than what the mainstream media has been saying.

March 26, 2020: “Stanford medical professors: COVID-19 death toll estimates may be ‘orders of magnitude’ too high”: https://www.theblaze.com/news/stanford_coronavirus_too_high_death

March 26, 2020: New England Journal of Medicine: “the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%)”: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2002387?fbclid=IwAR3psHRYCZL1uIMKU2cJuSrpcc7SCs7kAIjjfDCmXqG_bOjcWd2Li-xXZHs

April 8, 2020: From a medical paper: “The COVID-19 death risk in people <65 years old during the period of fatalities from the epidemic was equivalent to the death risk from driving between 9 miles per day (Germany) and 415 miles per day (New York City)”: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.05.20054361v1

April 11, 2020: The Economist: “Covid-19 takes 20-25 days to kill victims. The paper reckons that 7m Americans were infected from March 8th to 14th, and official data show 7,000 deaths three weeks later. The resulting fatality rate is 0.1%, similar to that of flu.”: https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/04/11/why-a-study-showing-that-covid-19-is-everywhere-is-good-news

April 18, 2020: Stanford University researchers: “Between 50 and 85 times as many people in Santa Clara County have coronavirus antibodies as have tested positive for the virus.”:  https://www.livescience.com/coronavirus-antibodies-widespread-in-santa-clara.html

April 20, 2020: Los Angeles County: “Based on the first round of testing, the research team estimated that roughly 4.1% of the county’s adult population has developed antibodies to the virus — an indication they are or were infected at some point. Adjusting for the statistical margin of error implies that approximately 221,000 to 442,000 adults in the county have had the infection. That estimate is 28 to 55 times higher than the 7,994 confirmed cases of COVID-19 reported to the county by the time of the study in early April.”: https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/early-antibody-testing-indicates-far-more-covid-19-cases-lower-mortality-rate/2349275/

April 20, 2020: Los Angeles County: “the study suggests that 0.1 percent to 0.2 percent of people infected by the virus will die, which would make COVID-19 only somewhat more deadly than the seasonal flu”: https://reason.com/2020/04/20/l-a-county-antibody-tests-suggest-the-fatality-rate-for-covid-19-is-much-lower-than-people-feared/

 

April 23, 2020. Tags: , , . COVID-19, Media bias. Leave a comment.

Attention Washington Post! If COVID-19 was truly putting supermarket employees in a “war zone,” their death rate would be higher, not lower, than the general population!

By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)

April 21, 2020

Real world evidence shows that the fatality rate of COVID-19 is far, far lower than what has been portrayed by the mainstream media. Examples of this can be read here, here, here, here, here, and here.

It has also been predicted that the shutdowns will kill more people than they save. Examples of this can be seen here, here, and here.

If the COVID-19 virus was truly as big of a threat as is being claimed by the mainstream media, then supermarket employees would have a much higher death rate than that of the general population. But there is no evidence that their death rate is higher. Therefore, if it’s OK for the supermarkets to be open, then it should also be OK for just about everything else to be open too.

So how does the COVID-19 death rate of supermarket employees compare to that of the general population?

On April 12, 2020, the Washington Post published this article.

It says that the U.S. has three million people who work in supermarkets, and that at least 41 of them had died from COVID-19. The Washington Post refers to this as a “war zone.”

The same article also says that more than 21,000 people in the U.S. had died from COVID-19.

The article is from April 12, so those numbers are somewhat out of date. However, I am more interested in the ratio of those numbers, so the fact that the article is somewhat out of date does not really matter.

The U.S. has 328 million people.

Supermarket employees make up approximately 1% of the U.S. population.

But they account for approximately only 0.2% of the country’s COVID-19 deaths.

If supermarkets were truly a “war zone,” then the death rate of their employees would be higher, not lower, than that of the general population.

I’d be curious to know how many supermarket employees died from the flu during the same time period. But I’m not holding my breath for the Washington Post to publish such a comparison.

In 2018, 36,560 people in the U.S. died from automobile accidents. I think it’s likely that somewhere between 300 and 400 of those were supermarket employees. It’s possible that during this COVID-19 “war zone,” more supermarket employees have been killed by automobile accidents than by COVID-19.

The best way to avoid dying in an automobile accident is to take mass transit instead of driving yourself. (The buses used for mass transit are bigger and heavier than cars, and often move more slowly than cars, so fatality rates are much lower than for cars.)

But the best way to avoid getting COVID-19 is to drive yourself instead of using mass transit. (Nearly half of COVID-19 deaths in the U.S. are in New York, and its overcrowded subway system seems to be the main reason for that.)

Quite a conundrum, I suppose.

Life is full of risks. And we need to acknowledge these risks, and act accordingly.

COVID-19 is real. And it is deadly.

But it is not nearly as deadly as many in the media have been trying to portray it.

Note from Daniel Alman: If you like this blog post that I wrote, you can buy my books from amazon, and/or donate to me via PayPal, using the links below:

amazon logo

 

April 21, 2020. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , . COVID-19, Media bias. Leave a comment.

Why Are the Mainstream Media Ignoring Tara Reade’s Sexual Assault Accusation Against Joe Biden?

https://reason.com/2020/03/30/joe-biden-tara-reade-sexual-assault-media/

Why Are the Mainstream Media Ignoring Tara Reade’s Sexual Assault Accusation Against Joe Biden?

So far, it’s been silence from The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, and others.

March 30, 2020

On September 14, 2018, The New York Times reported the existence of an unverified sexual misconduct allegation against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. The story cited three people who had read a letter sent by the accuser—Christine Blasey Ford—to Sen. Diane Feinstein (D–Calif.). Ford was not interviewed for the story; indeed, she wasn’t named.

Unconfirmed reports of a teenaged Kavanaugh assaulting a teenaged Ford evidently merited coverage from The Times. This prompts an obvious question: Why is the paper of record now declining to publicize a very troubling allegation against former Vice President Joe Biden?

The Times is hardly alone in this regard. The mainstream media have remained bafflingly silent about Tara Reade, a former member of then-Senator Biden’s staff who claims that he sexually assaulted her in 1993. Reade’s name has only appeared twice in The Washington Post, and both were quick asides: A news roundup from April of last year briefly acknowledged an earlier, milder version of Reade’s accusation, and a recent rapid-fire Q&A asked a Post political reporter to weigh-in on the political ramifications “of the Tara Reade bombshell.” (The nature of the bombshell is not described.)

And while the coronavirus pandemic is obviously dominating news coverage, CNN has made plenty of time for Biden. Chris Cillizza is still ranking Biden’s potential veep choices, and the network conducted a virtual townhall event with the candidate last Friday. Reade’s name didn’t come up, and it has never appeared at CNN.com. At NBC, it’s the same story: Chuck Todd interviewed Biden but didn’t ask about the allegation.

Reade’s story has garnered some coverage elsewhere, most noticeably from The Hill and The Intercept. Some left-leaning news sites—The Huffington Post, Vox—have written about it, and of course conservative media are all over the story. But the biggest mainstream print and TV outlets are, at present, silent.

I am not the only one to notice this. The Columbia Journalism Review notes that “media outlets on both the left and the right have covered Reade’s claim, yet mainstream news organizations have mostly avoided it.” That article links to a piece in The Guardian—part of a recurring feature called “The Week in Patriarchy”—that suggests the media may be ignoring the story because Reade’s accusations will be “difficult to prove.” To its credit, the Guardian piece acknowledges that this would be inconsistent with how the Kavanaugh accusation was handled.

That’s what’s most frustrating about this lack of mainstream coverage. Ideally, all media outlets—mainstream or otherwise—would tread carefully with respect to decades-old accusations. They would not rush to publish unverified rumors, instead carefully vetting them to the best of their ability. They would consider whether every salacious or scandalous detail of an important person’s past is worth revisiting.

Perhaps that’s what reporters at The New York Times, The Washington Post, and other outlets are doing. (I have heard it third-hand that various stories might be in the works, but nobody at those publications would confirm anything to me.) But Reade has already come forward. She has already identified herself and told her story. At this stage in the process of the Kavanaugh accusation’s public reveal, the mainstream press was already actively covering it.

As I wrote last week, there’s a case for taking Reade’s accusation more seriously than Ford’s, since the behavior described by Reade (penetrative sexual assault during Biden’s Senate years) is even worse than what was described by Ford.

And while it’s certainly true that there’s currently a global pandemic unfolding, that isn’t a good excuse to avoid discussing Reade. In fact, there’s some reason to proceed quickly: The Democratic Party will soon nominate Joe Biden to be its presidential candidate, but Sen. Bernie Sanders (I–Vt.) is technically still in the race, and he is still making the case that he should be the one to face President Donald Trump in November. Whether or not Biden is credibly accused of sexual assault is extremely relevant to this rapidly approaching decision point. This seems only slightly less urgent than covering Kavanaugh’s alleged misbehavior during the period immediately before his confirmation to the Supreme Court.

If the media’s rule is this—We’re going to proceed extremely cautiously when revisiting unverified sexual misconduct allegations that are several decades years old—then fine. But that’s a new rule, isn’t it?

April 1, 2020. Tags: , , , , , , . Joe Biden, Media bias. Leave a comment.

« Previous PageNext Page »