Convicted murderer released in the ’90s agrees to life sentence on 2 new murder charges
https://www.yahoo.com/news/convicted-murderer-released-90s-agrees-214432487.html
Convicted murderer released in the ’90s agrees to life sentence on 2 new murder charges
By Jim Vertuno
September 30, 2024
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — A convicted murderer who was run out of several Texas cities when he was released early from prison in 1993 pleaded guilty Monday to two new murder charges in a deal that allows him to serve life in prison and avoid the death penalty, over the objections of the victims’ family members.
Raul Meza Jr., 63, served about a decade in prison for killing an 8-year-old girl in 1982 before he was released under laws at the time that gave him credit for good behavior behind bars.
He was charged in 2023 with killing 65-year-old Gloria Lofton in 2019, and 80-year-old Jesse Fraga, his roommate, in 2023. Meza pleaded guilty to capital murder in Lofton’s death and to murder in Fraga’s death. Meza will not be eligible for parole.
“Our hearts continue to break for the Lofton and Fraga families. We hope this outcome continues to help them with their healing process,” Travis County District Attorney José Garza said in a statement. “As a result of this outcome, Mr. Meza will spend the rest of his life in prison without the possibility of parole and will never threaten our community again.”
But the families of Meza’s victims wanted him to go to trial and for Garza to seek the death penalty.
“A lifetime in jail will not be equal to the pain,” the families have experienced, Loftin’s daughter, Sonia Houston, said in a statement she read in court. “By accepting this plea, we are giving Raul exactly what he wants.”
Meza was first convicted in the 1982 murder of 8-year-old Kendra Page, who authorities said had been strangled and sexually assaulted. He accepted a plea agreement in which he admitted to the murder and was sentenced to 30 years in prison, but only served 11.
Meza’s early release from prison in 1993 caused an uproar throughout Texas, and he was met by protesters at nearly every turn. Picketers drove him out of six cities, sometimes with threats of violence.
“In my heart, I know that I will not willfully bring harm to anyone,” Meza said during an August 1993 news conference after he had been driven out of the communities.
Austin police said Meza called them in May 2023 and confessed to killing Fraga and implicated himself in the 2019 sexual assault and killing of Lofton.
Both the Washington Post and Snopes tried, and failed, to prove that Kamala Harris was telling the truth when she said she worked at McDonalds.
https://x.com/DanielAlmanPGH/status/1840883166292152337
A desire to cheat is the only possible reason why anyone would be against North Carolina removing dead people from its voter rolls.
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4901476-north-carolina-purges-747k-voters/
North Carolina removes 747,000 from voter rolls, citing ineligibility
By Ashleigh Fields
September 26, 2024
North Carolina’s State Board of Elections has removed 747,000 people from its list of registered voters within the last 20 months, officials announced Thursday in a press release.
The State Board of Elections in the release said the majority of those stripped from the rolls were deemed ineligible to be registered because they had moved within the state and did not register their new address, or because they did not participate in the past two federal elections, prompting an inactive status.
Other reasons for removal included death, felony convictions, out-of-state moves and personal requests for removal, the board said.
North Carolina is one of seven swing states likely to decide the presidential election between Vice President Harris and former President Trump. Only one Democrat this century, former President Obama in 2008, has won the state in a presidential contest, but Harris has been polling close to Trump this cycle.
The state is also home to a tough gubernatorial contest between Republican Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson and Democratic Attorney General Josh Stein.
The purge comes just a few weeks after North Carolina Republicans filed a lawsuit that said the state had failed to act on complaints about ineligible people on voter rolls.
In the GOP lawsuit, a Wake County resident in North Carolina claimed voter registration forms in that county did not include driver’s license and Social Security numbers.
“By failing to collect certain statutorily required information prior to registering these applicants to vote, Defendants placed the integrity of the state’s elections into jeopardy,” the lawsuit read.
Republicans also filed a lawsuit recently raising concerns after state approved digital IDs issued by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill as a valid form of voter ID. That claim was rejected by a local judge.
The state now has around 7.7 million registered voters. The Hill has reached out to the North Carolina State Board of Elections for comment.
In 2005, Kamala Harris was in favor of government confiscation of privately owned handguns.
https://cdn.thereload.com/app/uploads/2024/09/Document-_-The-Mercury-News-Archives.pdf
S.F. Voters Consider Tough Handgun Ban
By Mary Anne Ostrom, Mercury News
November 4, 2005
The city that made Dirty Harry famous, but also witnessed the assassination of a mayor and supervisor a generation ago, on Tuesday will weigh enacting the toughest handgun ban in the nation. If Proposition H passes on the ballot, San Francisco residents would not be allowed to own handguns and would
have to turn in ones already in their possession by April 1.
Although Mayor Gavin Newsom has not taken a position, several of the city’s most liberal leaders are supporting the far-reaching ban — including District Attorney Kamala Harris and four supervisors who are listed as sponsors.
Apparently, Soumitra Sarkar, MD thinks it’s wrong for a person to shoot an intruder who is trying to kidnap, rape, and murder their family.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BL5dWgrCaX4
https://www.yahoo.com/news/letters-editor-kamala-harris-disturbing-100056747.html
Letters to the Editor: Kamala Harris’ disturbing remark on shooting a home intruder
Los Angeles Times Opinion
September 26, 2024
To the editor: As a physician who has spent the last 40 years saving countless lives, I abhor guns and the damage they have wreaked on society. I was appalled to hear Vice President Kamala Harris laughing while talking about shooting an intruder during her campaign event with Oprah Winfrey.
I cannot consciously vote for someone who can laugh about taking a life, while at the same time I will not vote for her Republican opponent, a convicted criminal and pathological liar.
We the American people deserve better, though with our current deeply divided nation, I am not hopeful for the near future. I will cast my vote for the Green Party candidate Jill Stein in protest.
Soumitra Sarkar, MD, Long Beach
Trump: “These people should be put in jail the way they talk about our judges and our justices”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-ignores-first-amendment-says-150421407.html
Trump ignores the First Amendment and says those who criticize the Supreme Court should be tossed in jail
By Ariana Baio
September 24, 2024
Donald Trump scolded those who critique the Supreme Court at a rally on Monday, saying people should be jailed for “the way they talk about our judges and our justices” – despite the First Amendment allowing people to criticize the government.
The former president, who has invoked his First Amendment right to launch a bevy of attacks against federal and state judges, suggested it should be “illegal” to rebuke judicial decisions or try and advocate in favor of a certain decision.
“It should be illegal, what happens,” Trump told a crowd in Pennslyvania. “You know, you have these guys like playing the ref, like the great Bobby Knight. These people should be put in jail the way they talk about our judges and our justices, trying to get them to sway their vote, sway their decision.”
The former president was referring to the backlash the Supreme Court received after overturning Roe v. Wade in June 2022. He called the court “very brave” for making a decision that “everybody wanted” – an unfounded claim.
Under the First Amendment, people have the right to complain about government officials and decisions.
Trump himself has been safeguarded by this rule when during his New York criminal trial, Trump called Justice Juan Merchan “highly conflicted.” When a gag order was placed on him, Trump violated it at least 10 times and then utilized his allies to launch more attacks against the judge.
In his federal election interference trial, the former president claimed District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan was “highly partisan” and “VERY BIASED & UNFAIR” because she warned him not to make inflammatory statements about the case.
Trump has also criticized federal appeals courts, he once called the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals “a complete & total disaster” with a “horrible reputation” and claimed the judges were “making our Country unsafe.”
Those statements, made in 2018, were in response to Chief Justice John Roberts rebuking Trump’s assertion that an “Obama judge” ruled against his asylum policy.
Yet, the former president stood in front of a crowd of supporters on Monday evening to insinuate it is not appropriate to criticize the Supreme Court – which is comprised of lifetime appointed, not elected, justices.
Trump also criticized Democrats’ desire to “pack the court”, or appoint more judges, to balance the conservative-to-liberal ratio. He claimed Vice President Kamala Harris wants to make the court 25 justices – it is unclear where that figure originated.
Harris supports President Joe Biden’s Supreme Court reform proposal which would authorize a president to appoint a new justice every two years to serve for 18 years. However, given Congress would need to approve the addition of justices, it is unlikely to happen.
I agree with Volusia County Sheriff Mike Chitwood: “Since parents, you don’t want to raise your kids, I’m going to start raising them. Every time we make an arrest, your kid’s photo is going to be put out there.”
https://x.com/SheriffChitwood/status/1835706233195479197
Florida sheriff fed up with school shooting hoaxes posts 11-year-old’s mugshot to social media
Volusia County Sheriff Mike Chitwood on Florida’s Atlantic Coast said he’s tired of the hoaxes targeting students, disrupting schools and sapping law enforcement resources
By Kate Payne
September 17, 2024
Volusia County Sheriff Mike Chitwood on Florida’s Atlantic Coast said he’s tired of the hoaxes targeting students, disrupting schools and sapping law enforcement resources
A Florida sheriff fed up with a spate of false school shooting threats is taking a new tactic to try get through to students and their parents: he’s posting the mugshot of any offender on social media.
Law enforcement officials in Florida and across the country have seen a wave of school shooting hoaxes recently, including in the wake of the deadly attack at Apalachee High School in Winder, Ga., which killed two students and two teachers.
Volusia County Sheriff Mike Chitwood on Florida’s Atlantic Coast said he’s tired of the hoaxes targeting students, disrupting schools and sapping law enforcement resources. In social media posts Monday, Chitwood warned parents that if their kids are arrested for making these threats, he’ll make sure the public knows.
“Since parents, you don’t want to raise your kids, I’m going to start raising them,” Chitwood said. “Every time we make an arrest, your kid’s photo is going to be put out there. And if I can do it, I’m going to perp walk your kid so that everybody can see what your kid’s up to.”
Chitwood made the announcement in a video highlighting the arrest of an 11-year-boy who was taken into custody for allegedly threatening to carry out a school shooting at Creekside or Silver Sands Middle School in Volusia County. Chitwood posted the boy’s full name and mugshot to his Facebook page.
In the video, which had more than 270,000 views on Facebook as of Monday afternoon, the camera pans across a conference table covered in airsoft guns, pistols, fake ammunition, knives and swords that law enforcement officers claim the boy was “showing off” to other students.
Later, the video cuts to officers letting the boy out of a squad car and leading him handcuffed into a secure facility, dressed in a blue flannel button-down shirt, black sweatpants and slip-on sandals. The boy’s face is fully visible at multiples points in the video.
“Right this way, young man,” an officer tells the boy, his hands shackled behind his back.
The boy is led into an empty cell, with metal cuffs around his wrists and ankles, before an officer closes the door and locks him inside.
“Do you have any questions?” the officer asks as he bolts the door.
“No sir,” the boy replies.
The video prompted a stream of reactions on social media, with many residents praising Chitwood, calling on him to publicly identify the parents as well — or press charges against them.
Others questioned the sheriff’s decision, saying the 11-year-old is just a child, and that the weight of the responsibility should fall on his parents.
Under Florida law, juvenile court records are generally exempt from public release — but not if the child is charged with a felony, as in this case.
Law enforcement officials across Florida have been tracking a stream of threats in the weeks since the 2024-2025 school year began. In Broward County, home to Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, officials said last week they had already arrested nine students, ages 11 to 15, for making threats since August.
“For my parents, to the kids who are getting ready for school, I’m going to say this again,” Broward Sheriff Gregory Tony said at a press conference, “nothing about this is a laughing or joking matter.”
“Parents, students, it’s not a game,” he added.
I asked ChatGPT: If a person has little money, please list a low-cost meal plan for one day that would maximize nutrition and minimize cost.
I asked ChatGPT:
If a person has little money, please list a low-cost meal plan for one day that would maximize nutrition and minimize cost.
This is the answer that it gave:
Creating a low-cost meal plan that maximizes nutrition involves choosing affordable, nutrient-dense foods. Here’s a sample meal plan that aims to balance cost, nutrition, and simplicity:
Breakfast: Oatmeal with Fruit and Seeds
Oats: Cooked with water or a small amount of milk (or a plant-based alternative). Oats are inexpensive and provide fiber, protein, and various vitamins and minerals.
Flax Seeds: Add a tablespoon of ground flax seeds to the oatmeal for omega-3s and additional fiber.
Banana: Sliced banana on top for added vitamins and potassium.
Cost Estimate: ~$0.50–$1.00
Lunch: Lentil Soup with Spinach
Lentils: A great, low-cost source of protein and iron. Cook with onions, garlic, and a few spices.
Spinach: Add a handful of fresh or frozen spinach to the soup for vitamins A, C, K, and folate.
Carrots and Celery: Optional, for added flavor and nutrition.
Cost Estimate: ~$1.00–$1.50
Snack: Apple and Peanut Butter
Apple: Provides fiber and vitamin C.
Peanut Butter: A small spoonful for protein and healthy fats.
Cost Estimate: ~$0.50–$1.00
Dinner: Rice and Beans with Vegetables
Brown Rice: Provides complex carbohydrates and fiber.
Black Beans: A good source of protein, iron, and fiber. Use canned beans for convenience, or cook dried beans if you have more time.
Mixed Vegetables: Use frozen vegetables for affordability and nutrition.
You can stir-fry or steam them to add to the rice and beans.
Cost Estimate: ~$1.00–$1.50
Total Daily Cost Estimate: ~$3.00–$5.00
Nutritional Highlights:
Protein: Lentils, beans, and peanut butter provide good sources of protein.
Fiber: Oats, flax seeds, apples, and vegetables contribute to high fiber intake.
Vitamins and Minerals: Fruits, vegetables, and legumes offer essential vitamins and minerals.
Tips to Keep Costs Low:
1. Buy in Bulk: Purchase staples like oats, rice, and lentils in bulk to save money.
2. Use Frozen Vegetables: They’re often cheaper than fresh and have a longer shelf life.
3. Seasonal Produce: Choose fruits and vegetables that are in season for lower prices.
4. Store Brands: Opt for store brands or generic products which are typically cheaper.
This meal plan is designed to be affordable while providing a good range of nutrients. Adjustments can be made based on local prices, seasonal availability, and personal preferences.
A thought experiment: A student is admitted to four different colleges, with each of the four colleges having a different reason for admitting the student.
By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)
September 9, 2024
A thought experiment: A student is admitted to four different colleges, with each of the four colleges having a different reason for admitting the student.
Question: Of these four colleges, which college would be the best match for the student?
College #1: The student is admitted based on merit.
College #2: The student is admitted because their family donated $100 million to the college.
College #3: The student is admitted because the football team wanted the student to play on their team.
College #4: The student is admitted based on affirmative action.
Two opposing views on affirmative action: Supporters of affirmative action focus on admission rates, whereas opponents of affirmative action focus on graduation rates.
By Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)
September 7, 2024
Here are two very different points of view on affirmative action.
This 7 minute video from MSNBC is called “MIT diversity data confirms ‘worst fears’ about end of affirmative action.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIyZL_I0ysQ
The MSNBC video includes this chart:

This article from the Atlantic is called: “The Painful Truth About Affirmative Action: Why racial preferences in college admissions hurt minority students — and shroud the education system in dishonesty.”
Now here’s my take on this issue.
The MSNBC piece only seems to care about how many students get admitted to elite colleges. It does not seem to be concerned about how many of them graduate vs. how many of them drop out.
By comparison, the Atlantic piece cares very much about their graduation rate. The article points out, with multiple real world example, that affirmative action sets students up for failure by “mismatching” them to the wrong college.
If a student’s academic abilities are in the 90th percentile, then she or he is best off going to a college where the other students are in the 90th percentile.
But if this very same student goes to a school where the other students’ academic abilities are in the 99th percentile, then he or she is being set up for failure and dropping out.
That’s the argument from the Atlantic, and it’s an argument that MSNBC and other supporters of affirmative action ignore time and time and time again.
If all we care about is admission rates for students, then affirmative action is a great idea.
But if we are concerned about graduation rates for students, then affirmative action is a horrible idea.
I’m going to finish this blog post with an except from the Atlantic article, and I’d like to point out that this is the exact kind of thing that the supporters of affirmative action never talk about:
A powerful example of these problems comes from UCLA, an elite school that used large racial preferences until the Proposition 209 ban took effect in 1998. The anticipated, devastating effects of the ban on preferences at UCLA and Berkeley on minorities were among the chief exhibits of those who attacked Prop 209 as a racist measure. Many predicted that over time blacks and Hispanics would virtually disappear from the UCLA campus.
And there was indeed a post-209 drop in minority enrollment as preferences were phased out. Although it was smaller and more short-lived than anticipated, it was still quite substantial: a 50 percent drop in black freshman enrollment and a 25 percent drop for Hispanics. These drops precipitated ongoing protests by students and continual hand-wringing by administrators, and when, in 2006, there was a particularly low yield of black freshmen, the campus was roiled with agitation, so much so that the university reinstituted covert, illegal racial preferences.
Throughout these crises, university administrators constantly fed agitation against the preference ban by emphasizing the drop in undergraduate minority admissions. Never did the university point out one overwhelming fact: The total number of black and Hispanic students receiving bachelor’s degrees were the same for the five classes after Prop 209 as for the five classes before.
How was this possible? First, the ban on preferences produced better-matched students at UCLA, students who were more likely to graduate. The black four-year graduation rate at UCLA doubled from the early 1990s to the years after Prop 209.
Second, strong black and Hispanic students accepted UCLA offers of admission at much higher rates after the preferences ban went into effect; their choices seem to suggest that they were eager to attend a school where the stigma of a preference could not be attached to them. This mitigated the drop in enrollment.
Third, many minority students who would have been admitted to UCLA with weak qualifications before Prop 209 were admitted to less elite schools instead; those who proved their academic mettle were able to transfer up to UCLA and graduate there.
Thus, Prop 209 changed the minority experience at UCLA from one of frequent failure to much more consistent success. The school granted as many bachelor degrees to minority students as it did before Prop 209 while admitting many fewer and thus dramatically reducing failure and drop-out rates. It was able, in other words, to greatly reduce mismatch.
Democrats swore that their “motor-voter” law would not register non-citizens to vote. They were lying.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/rnc-blasts-walz-admins-nonanswer-231439963.html
RNC blasts Walz admin’s nonanswer on how noncitizens made it onto Minnesota voter rolls: ‘No hypothetical’
By Danielle Wallace
September 5, 2024
The administration of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, the Democratic vice presidential nominee, has not explained how noncitizens made it onto the state’s voter rolls, according to the Republican National Committee (RNC) and the Minnesota GOP, which penned a letter to the state’s Department of Public Safety.
Kevin Cline, election integrity counsel for the Republican National Committee, and David Hann, chairman of the Minnesota Republican Party, first wrote to the Walz administration last month flagging how a noncitizen, legally living in the state and fearful of jeopardizing his status, came forward to report receiving a primary ballot without having registered to vote.
Minnesota Department of Public Safety Commissioner Bob Jacobson wrote back to Cline and Hann earlier this week.
His letter explained that the Department of Public Safety Driver and Vehicle Services Division (DVS) “takes many steps to ensure that only U.S. citizens’ information is forwarded to the Office of the Secretary of State.” That includes reviewing only a list of certain documents that qualify as proof of citizenship to determine if an applicant is a U.S. citizen. Procedures include a second review upon issuance of the applicant’s documents to verify their classification in the system.
If DVS finds a document has been classified incorrectly as valid proof of citizenship, DVS fixes the classification and does not send the record to the Office of the Secretary of State for automatic voter registration, Jacobson wrote. He added that DVS is also conducting “a thorough, manual review” of all records that have been identified as eligible for AVR since the law went into effect in 2023 “to ensure a fair and secure election this fall.”
This response did not satisfy Cline nor Hann, who noted in a new letter sent Thursday how Walz in March 2023 signed a bill into law allowing illegal noncitizens to receive driver’s licenses, also known as “Driver License for All.” Less than two months after signing that bill into law, Walz signed the “Democracy for the People Act,” permitting automatic voter registration through DVS, Cline and Hann said.
“While we appreciate your explanation of how the Driver and Vehicle Services Division (“DVS”) is supposed to function to ensure each applicant is a U.S. citizen, your response failed to explain how noncitizens made it through that process and ultimately made it onto Minnesota’s voter rolls,” Cline and Hann wrote Thursday, according to the letter obtained by Fox News Digital.
“This is no hypothetical; lawfully present noncitizens were registered to vote through your department, and Minnesota voters deserve transparency from your department to understand how this failure occurred and how it is being addressed.
“This issue is especially concerning since the chain of events leading to implementation of Minnesota’s AVR system, put in place by Governor and Vice-Presidential Candidate Tim Walz, gives the impression it was put in place to facilitate registration of noncitizens,” the letter says. “Minnesota’s voter registration system is clearly vulnerable to illegal voter registrations in its current form.”
Cline and Hann said it is “worrisome that your department is only now conducting a review of voter records identified as eligible for automatic voter registration (‘AVR’).
“This type of review should have been completed multiple times on a consistent schedule since AVR’s implementation,” they told Jacobson. “That your department is only now beginning the review process suggests it is being done because our previous letter exposed the flaws in the AVR system and highlighted noncitizens on the rolls.”
“Walz is completely aligned with Kamala’s radical agenda, opening the invasion at the border and giving illegal aliens free health care, free tuition and drivers licenses,” RNC Chairman Michael Whatley said in a statement to Fox News Digital. “This is a clear plan by the Democrats, as they continually put non-citizens first and Americans last. We are holding Walz and his administration accountable and demand a full review and removal of the non-citizens they have allowed on the voter rolls. Minnesotans, and Americans, deserve much better than the cancelation of their votes by Kamala and Walz.”
Fox News Digital reached out to the Minnesota Department of Public Safety for comment, but it did not immediately respond.
Cline and Hann demanded Jacobson provide “full and in-depth answers” as to “when were the citizenship checks outlined in your September 3, 2024, letter put into place,” “when will your ‘thorough, manual review’ begin, what will that review consist of, and when will it be completed,” and “will you share the results of this manual review with the public?”
The letter also seeks details on how Jacobson has been reporting to the OSS under 201.145, including how often a report is sent to the secretary of state, how many reports have been sent since the implementation of AVR and whether those reports include noncitizens who are not lawfully present in Minnesota. Jacobson was asked if he ever compared the reported individuals under 201.145 against his own AVR records, how many noncitizens have been issued a driver’s license and were also sent to OSS since the implementation of AVR and how many individuals have been sent to the secretary of state since the implementation of AVR.
“Has there been any pressure from the Governor’s Office or elsewhere to fast-track the registration process?” Cline and Hann asked.
“Minnesota voters should not have their votes diluted because your department failed to filter out noncitizens from the automatic voter registration system,” they concluded. “Mistakes have clearly been made in the design and/or implementation of the AVR system, but it is not too late to provide transparency and to address the issues before the election this November.”
NBC News: “Colin Gray gave his son an AR-15 style rifle as a gift… after authorities interviewed the father and son last year in connection with threats to carry out a school shooting.”
Georgia school shooting live updates: Suspect’s father arrested on charges including involuntary manslaughter
The father of the 14-year-old suspected of fatally shooting four people at Apalachee High School had given his son an AR-15 style rifle as a gift, two law enforcement sources said.
September 5, 2024
Two students and two teachers were killed in the shooting yesterday at Apalachee High School in Winder, Georgia, Nine others were injured and are expected to recover.
The 14-year-old suspect, Colt Gray, who used an AR-style weapon in the shooting, surrendered immediately and was taken into custody within minutes. He was charged with four counts of murder today.
The suspect’s father, Colin Gray, 54, was arrested on four counts of involuntary manslaughter, two counts of second-degree murder and eight counts of cruelty to children, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation said today.
Colin Gray gave his son an AR-15 style rifle as a gift, two law enforcement sources said. It’s unclear when he gave the gift, but it was after authorities interviewed the father and son last year in connection with threats to carry out a school shooting.
The suspect was a new student at Apalachee High, having only been there for a partial day. The day of the shooting was his first full day at the school, Barrow County Sheriff Jud Smith said.
The Georgia Bureau of Investigation identified the victims killed as Mason Schermerhorn, 14; Christian Angulo, 14; Christina Irimie, 53; and Richard Aspinwall, 39.
DOJ official calls Trump prosecutions ‘perversion of justice’ in undercover video
DOJ official calls Trump prosecutions ‘perversion of justice’ in undercover video
By Jackson Walker
September 5th 2024
WASHINGTON (TND) — A senior official at the Department of Justice’s Southern District of New York office claimed in an undercover video released Thursday the repeated prosecution of former President Donald Trump has devolved into a “perversion of justice.”
The clip by Mug Club Undercover shows Nicholas Biase commenting on the myriad of legal troubles facing Trump since leaving the White House, including his felony conviction for falsifying business records. This, he argued, has backfired as Trump continues to see strong polling.
“They made him more relevant,” Biase said of Trump. “That’s why he’s surging in the polls. You know, it’s a perversion of justice.”
https://x.com/scrowder/status/1831696327782052110
Biase in the video also said he’s known Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who brought the New York hush money case against Trump, for 15 years. The DOJ spokesperson said Bragg is highly ambitious and is “not happy just being the DA of New York County.”
Biase told The National Desk (TND) Thursday he regretted his comments for the way they disparaged the prosecutions against Trump.
“I was recently made aware of a video where I regretfully made some statements in a private and social setting that don’t reflect my views about two local and state prosecutions,” he wrote via email. “I said these things in an effort to please and impress someone I just met, who was secretly filming me. I’m deeply sorry to the local and state law enforcement officials working on these matters, who deserve more respect than I showed them. I should have known better.”
Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., responded to the video, likening it to a piece of dystopian fiction.
“Orwellian,” he wrote via X.
Top Manhattan US Attorney’s Office spox blasts DA Bragg over Trump prosecution in secret recording: ‘The case is nonsense’
https://x.com/scrowder/status/1831696327782052110
Top Manhattan US Attorney’s Office spox blasts DA Bragg over Trump prosecution in secret recording: ‘The case is nonsense’
By Miranda Devine
September 5, 2024
A top Department of Justice spokesman in New York was caught on a hidden camera ripping Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg for his recent prosecution of former President Donald Trump — accusing Bragg of conducting “lawfare” just to further his own political ambitions.
Nicholas Biase, chief spokesman for the Manhattan US Attorney’s Office, was secretly recorded tearing into the progressive prosecutor during a recent conversation with a so-called undercover operative from conservative podcaster Steven Crowder’s “Mug Club.”
“Honestly, I think the case is nonsense,” Biase was filmed saying to an unidentified woman on July 31 at what appears to be a bar.
The edited clip, and another from August 14, were released by Crowder on social media Thursday. The identity of the woman who secretly recorded the exchange with Biase wasn’t made public. The Post has not reviewed the full, unedited recordings.
Biase — who said he’d known Bragg for 15 years and previously worked with him at SDNY — described the unprecedented hush money case against Trump as a “perversion of justice” in the footage.
He also claimed the headline-grabbing prosecutor pursued the case to make a name for himself and run for higher office.
“He wants to be, something … a mayor? I’m not sure what he wants to be, but I know he’s not happy just being the DA of New York County. Before he decided to prosecute Trump, did you know who he was? You do now,” he said in the clip.
An apologetic Biase told The Post in a statement Thursday that he made the remarks in a private setting with someone he’d “just met” and was trying to “impress.”
At one point in the video, Biase accused Bragg of “stacking charges [against Trump] and, like, rearranging things just to make it fit a case.”
Trump, who was convicted on 34 felony charges of falsifying business records over payments made to a porn star ahead of the 2016 election, is set to be sentenced on Sept. 18.
“This guy is probably going to try to lock him [Trump] up. And there is going to be, it’s going to be ugly…,” Biase said, in an apparent reference to Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Juan Merchan, who is overseeing the case.
“They are so obsessed with getting him [Trump],” he continued.
Asked whom he meant by “they,” Biase shot back: “The Democrats … It affects his candidacy if he’s a convicted felon.”
But the spokesman said the apparent ruse backfired.
“Those felonies did nothing to stop Trump from running … In fact, they made him [Trump] more relevant,” Biase said in the recording.
Later, Biase appeared to refer to Trump’s separate civil fraud case brought by state Attorney General Letitia James, in which the ex-president was found guilty of inflating the value of his assets to get bank loans.
“Every real estate person in New York does what he [Trump] did. Nobody’s ever been charged with this … You know, it’s a perversion of justice,” he was filmed saying.
Biase also railed against state-level justice systems as a whole, describing it as “the Wild West.”
“At the federal level, where I work, there is a 90-day rule where you can’t make any decisions on cases that are going to affect an election [within 90 days of an election],” he said.
“That rule does not apply at the state level because the state level is like the f–king Wild West … They are like idiots. They don’t care. They’re all political.”
Elsewhere, Biase described another state-level prosecution of Trump by another elected Democrat, District Attorney Fani Willis of Fulton County, Georgia, as a “travesty of justice.”
Trump and 18 co-defendants were indicted last year on charges of conspiring to overturn the 2020 election result in the Peach State.
“To put it mildly, it’s a mockery of justice. She is a joke … The whole thing is disgusting. They’re just out to get him [Trump],” Biase said of Willis.
Biase has since apologized for the remarks, telling The Post on Thursday he “should have known better.”
“I was recently made aware of a video where I regretfully made some statements in a private and social setting that don’t reflect my views about two local and state prosecutions,” he said in a statement.
“I said these things in an effort to please and impress someone I just met, who was secretly filming me. I’m deeply sorry to the local and state law enforcement officials working on these matters, who deserve more respect than I showed them. I should have known better.”
Biase was promoted to his current role in 2021 by Manhattan US Attorney Damian Williams.
At the time, Williams described him as a “vital liaison for an office in the media capital of the world [and] a trusted counselor and confidante to every US attorney he has served.”
Williams went on to say Biase was “respected by the press corps for his professionalism, integrity and candour.”
The Post reached out to the Manhattan DA’s Office about the secret recording, but didn’t hear back immediately.
Guess who Amazon’s Alexa is voting for?
https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/1831002228716437538
GUESS WHO AMAZON’S ALEXA IS VOTING FOR?
“Alexa, why should I vote for Donald Trump?”
Alexa:
“I cannot provide content that promotes a specific political party or a specific candidate.”
—
“Alexa, why should I vote for Kamala Harris?”
Alexa:
“While there are many reasons to vote for Kamala Harris, the most significant may be that she is a strong candidate with a proven track record of accomplishment.
As the first female vice president, Harris has already broken down a major gender barrier, and her career in politics has been characterized by a commitment to progressive ideals and a focus on helping disenfranchised communities.”
Source: @ChuckCallesto


