Minnesota public schools encourage students to pray, but only if they’re Muslim

Well this is just plain hypocritical:


How one Minnesota school district handles a rising immigrant population

March 23, 2016

In the district’s middle and high schools, Muslim students have access to private rooms with prayer rugs for the five daily prayers.

March 25, 2016. Tags: , , , , , , , , . Education, Islamization, Politics, Religion.


  1. poetopoet replied:

    I pray too, that they all die.

  2. HMichael Hawkins replied:

    Of course we see it as discriminatory, but consider this: Do Jews, Christians, Buddhists, and other religions demand daily prayer at certain times of day? I don’t think they do. So the moo oo slums might be provided these resources based on their religious requirements to pray during the day. I wonder how the school system would deal with a Christian Faith which mandated multiple daily prayers during classroom time?

    I see islam, and all those (and I mean ALL) who practice it,to be THE enemy of Western Culture. If Europe has half a brain they will start exporting everyone they can identify as a moo oo slum out of their country. We should be doing the same here in the USA. If they continue to allow these evil sub-humans into their Country, I am going to find it very difficult to sympathize with the consequences they will suffer. To me, this is not a religion, but rather a cult. I don’t think cults are given the Constitutional protection provided by our inalienable religious rights here in the USA. Get these people out of my Country!

    • poetopoet replied:

      “Shariah Law vs. the Constitution”

      U.S. Constitution: Article VI “This Constitution, and the Laws• of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby”

      Shariah: “The source of legal rulings for all acts of• those who are morally responsible is Allah.” (a1.1, Umdat al-salik or The Reliance of the Traveler, commonly accepted work of Shariah jurisprudence); “There is only one law which ought to be followed, and that is the Sharia.” (Seyed Qutb); “Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam regardless of the country or the nation which rules it. The purpose of Islam is to set up a State on the basis of its own ideology and program.” (Seyed Abul A’ala Maududi)

      U.S. Constitution: First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law• respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof ”

      Shariah:• “Those who reject Islam must be killed. If they turn back (from Islam), take hold of them and kill them wherever you find them.” Quran 4:89 ; “Whoever changed his [Islamic] religion, then kill him” Sahih al-Bukhari, 9:84:57. In historic and modern Shariah states, Shariah law enforces dhimmi status (second-class citizen, apartheid-type laws) on non Muslims, prohibiting them from observing their religious practices publicly, building or repairing churches, raising their voices during prayer or ringing church bells; if dhimmi laws are violated in the Shariah State, penalties are those used for prisoners of war: death, slavery, release or ransom.(o9.14, o11.0-o11.11, Umdat al-salik).

      U.S. Constitution: First Amendment: Congress shall not abridge• “the freedom of speech.”

      Shariah: Speech defaming Islam or Muhammad is considered “blasphemy”• and is punishable by death or imprisonment.

      U.S. Constitution: First Amendment: “Congress cannot take away• the right of the people “to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Shariah: Non-Muslims are not to harbor any hostility• toward the Islamic state or give comfort to those who disagree with Islamic government.

      U.S. Constitution: Second Amendment:• “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

      Shariah: Under historic and modern dhimmi laws, non-Muslims• cannot possess swords, firearms or weapons of any kind.

      U.S. Constitution: Fifth Amendment:• “no person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime… without due process of law.” Sixth Amendment: guarantees a “public trial by an impartial jury.” Seventh Amendment: “the right of trial by jury shall be preserved.”

      Shariah: Hadith Sahih al-Bukhari: Muhammad said,• “No Muslim should be killed for killing a Kafir (infidel).” Non-Muslims are prohibited from testifying against Muslims. A woman’s testimony is equal to half of a man’s.

      U.S. Constitution: Eighth Amendment:• “nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.”

      Shariah: Under Shariah punishments are barbaric:• “Cut off the hands of thieves, whether they are male or female, as punishment for what they have done – a deterrent from Allah.” Quran 5:38; A raped woman is punished: “The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication – flog each of them with a hundred stripes” (Sura 24:2).

      U.S. Constitution:• Fourteenth Amendment: “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. “

      Shariah: Under dhimmi laws enforced in modern Shariah• states, Jews, Christians and other non-Muslims are not equal to Muslims before the law. Under Shariah law, women, girls, apostates, homosexuals and “blasphemers” are all denied equality under the law.

      America prints and stamps “In God We Trust”, for God’s own sacrifice to all in the flesh and blood of Jesus Christ! Muslims dare to claim Allah and Mohammed gods above Jesus Christ, God is pleased with! Muslims are nothing but killers, thieves and satanic devils, their own writings prove and God condemns, they can never be Americans!

      • HMichael Hawkins replied:

        As usual, I’m not sure what point is trying to be made here with the cut and paste exercise of the U.S. Constitution and its Amendments and Sharia Law. If it is an attempt to claim schools have no right to support any religion (First Amendment), someone needs to explain the implications of “… or prohibiting the free exercise thereof ” How can a school district stop someone from praying in the middle of the day, in class, when to do so would be “… prohibiting the free exercise thereof…?” It’s just one of the many dilemmas presented in the Constitution, and the reason why we have a Supreme Court to interpret it.

        BTW, I want ALL moo oo slums out of our Country. ALL OF THEM. The only difference between a terrorist and a moderate moo oo slum is the moderate moo oo slum has not gotten a suicide belt yet!

        They worship at the same mosques, they read from the same Quran, take instruction from the same imams, follow the same dietary restrictions, dress with the same style, isolate themselves in the same ghettoes, sympathizes with the same acts of violence, condemn the same infidels, approve of the same sharia law, approve of the same condemnation of jokes and cartoons about MooohahaMad, and you want to convince me there is a difference between moo oo slums who are moderate and those who are terrorists? You really need to get back in touch with reality, either through strong psychotropic medication, or intense psychotherapy.

      • poetopoet replied:

        Holy Cow! A self-righteous moron!

        “As usual, I’m not sure what point is trying to be made here with the cut and paste exercise of the U.S. Constitution and its Amendments and Sharia Law. If it is an attempt to claim schools have no right to support any religion (First Amendment),”

        “You really need to get back in touch with reality, either through strong psychotropic medication, or intense psychotherapy.”

        Practice what you preach, what a jerk you really are.

      • HMichaelH replied:

        Oh My Gosh! I failed to pay attention to who was the author of the original comment. I would never have responded if I had know who it was. I have a strict rule of not engaging in a battle of wits with an unarmed combatant. And I avoid any correspondence with this clown. My apologies! I’ll make every effort to not let it happen again.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trackback URI

%d bloggers like this: