Obamacare may cause the government to seize homes from the estates of poor people

In the past 20 years, the state of California has seized $978.5 million worth of assets from the estates of medicaid recipients.

Obamacare requires everyone in the U.S. whose income is less than 138% of the poverty level to enroll in medicaid.

Based on those two pieces of information, it seems likely that Obamacare will result in the homes of quite a few poor people being seized by the government.

The Los Angeles Times reports:

One thing the ACA didn’t change was Medicaid’s estate recovery rule. Under a law enacted in 1993, states are required to seek recovery from the estates of deceased enrollees for the costs of long-term care, such as nursing-home care. The recovery rule applied to those who received that care when they were 55 and older, or who were permanently institutionalized at any age.

Medicaid eligibility for the expanded programs is based on income alone, which means there might be some new members with low incomes but sizable illiquid estates, such as homes worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

The prospect of asset seizures raises people’s hackles, especially since under the Affordable Care Act, those earning less than 138% of the poverty level may be offered no choice for subsidized health insurance except Medicaid.

On the whole, the estate recovery program hasn’t been a big moneymaker for government at any level. Since 1993, California has collected $978.5 million


February 12, 2014. Tags: , , , . Health care, Police state, Politics.


  1. Constitution Believer replied:

    That may be more fact then fiction.
    Here in Ohio should you need to use the services of Medicaid you will end up loosing your home.
    Two people passed away on either side of me within a week of each other. Neither knew each other but when they passed away their families were forced to either sign over the deeds to their home or pay what was paid out by the state.
    Now many liberals will say that is good not thinking many of their people don’t even own anything but yet have more then the poor do.

  2. Fred replied:

    There is a 6 year look back. My mothers estate was transferred to trusts
    and LLC’s prior, so nothing to recover. Nobody in my family holds any assets on paper personally. Any decent estate planner will protect assets like that. There is no excuse for not protecting assets from recovery..

    • paola medina replied:

      To Fred: Living trusts or irrevocable trusts??

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trackback URI

%d bloggers like this: