Wikipedia’s Obamacare article continues to knowingly and deliberately include false information

On October 15, 2013, I posted Wikipedia’s article on Obamacare is a heavily censored, utopian puff piece that ignores Obamacare’s real world problems

On November 6, 2013, I followed that up with Wikipedia’s Obamacare article continues to be a heavily biased and censored puff piece

Now, on November 30, 2013, I am writing part 3 of this series.

Wikipedia’s Obamacare article still includes a substantial amount of false information. Suggestions to correct this, with many reliable sources, have been repeatedly posted on the article’s talk page, but the comments were erased, and the editors who made these comments were banned.

So we know that it is not an accident that wikipedia contains false information about Obamacare. It is a deliberate action on the part of Obama supporters. They saw the comments on the talk page about how to correct the article, but they knowingly and deliberately chose to continue keeping the false information in the article.

The article has a section called “Effects on insurance premiums,” which cites 12 different sources. However, all of those sources talk about premiums going down. There are zero references to the “rate shock” that has been widely reported by the mainstream media. Many news sources, including the Washington Post, the Christian Science Monitor, Investor’s Business Daily, the Daily Caller, CBS News, Forbes, CNN, the San Jose Mercury News,  and the San Francisco Chronicle, have reported on Obamacare’s “rate shock,” and have been cited on the article’s talk page. But the Obama supporters at wikipedia will not allow any of this information to be in the article.

The article has a section called “Change in number of uninsured” which has 10 citations. However, it only mentions increases, both theoretical increases and real increases. It does not mention any of the people who lost their insurance, whether these be theoretical losses or real losses. For example, it does not mention any of the following 22 examples:

1) After Obamacare was passed, the Congressional Budget Office said that the law would cause seven million people to lose their employer provided insurance.

2) After Obamacare was passed, 1199SEIU United Healthcare Workers East announced that it would drop health insurance for the children of more than 30,000 low-wage home attendants. Mitra Behroozi, executive director of benefit and pension funds for 1199SEIU stated

“… new federal health-care reform legislation requires plans with dependent coverage to expand that coverage up to age 26… meeting this new requirement would be financially impossible.”

3) After Obamacare was passed, the Franciscan University of Steubenville dropped its coverage in response to the law.

4) Universal Orlando dropped its coverage for part time employees in response to Obamacare.

5) After Obamacare was passed, Forbes reported

“The House Ways and Means Committee has released a new report that sheds light onto how Obamacare incentivizes companies to dump their workers onto the new law’s subsidized exchanges.”

6) After Obamacare was passed, MSN reported

“The Affordable Care Act mandate most commonly known as Obamacare has some tight stipulations that, CNN says, are forcing health care companies to rip up most of their current plans and draft new ones that comply. According to a University of Chicago study, just about half of the individual health care plans currently on the market won’t cut it once key provisions of the Affordable Care Act kick in next year.”

7) It was reported that Obamacare would cause 58,000 Aetna and UnitedHealth Group customers in California to lose their insurance.

8) In response to Obamacare, some employers have dropped coverage for their employees’ spouses. In August 2013, it was reported that UPS had announced that it would be dropping 15,000 spouses of its employees from its health insurance, and that it had cited Obamacare as the reason it was doing this.

9) The chain of Wegmans supermarkets cancelled the policies of its part time employees in response to Obamacare.

10) In July 2013, leaders of the Teamsters, UFCW, and UNITE-HERE sent a letter to Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi which said that Obamacare

“will shatter not only our hard-earned health benefits… these restrictions will make non-profit plans like ours unsustainable… we can no longer stand silent in the face of elements of the Affordable Care Act that will destroy the very health and well being of our members along with millions of other hardworking Americans”

11) In August 2013, it was reported that 106,000 New Jersey citizens would lose their health insurance because of Obamacare.

12) In September 2013, IBM announced that it would be switching 110,000 of its retirees from their current IBM-provided health insurance to the Obamacare exchanges.

13 In September 2013, Trader Joe’s announced that, in response to Obamacare, it would stop providing insurance to its part time employees.

14) In October 2013, it was reported that at least 146,000 people in Michigan would be losing their insurance because of Obamacare.

15) In October 2013, it was reported that Florida Blue would be dropping 300,000 customers because of Obamacare.

16) In October 2013, it was reported that 491,977 individual insurance plans in California would be canceled because of Obamacare.

17) In October 2013, it was reported that, in response to Obamacare, Home Depot would stop providing insurance to its part time employees.

18) In October 2013, it was reported that Obamacare was forcing CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield to cancel the insurance of 76,000 people in Virginia, Maryland, and Washington, D.C., because their policies did not meet the minimum requirements of Obamacare.

19) In October 2013, it was reported that hundreds of thousands of people in Washington state would be losing their insurance because of Obamacare.

20) In November 2013, it was reported that nearly nearly 250,000 people in Colorado would lose their insurance because of Obamacare.

21) In June 2010 in the Federal Register, the Obama administration estimated that 93 million people would lose their insurance because of Obamacare.

22) On November 12, 2013, Forbes reported:

The Obamacare Exchange Scorecard: Around 100,000 Enrollees And Five Million Cancellations

HHS has released the official numbers here. The HHS report states that only 26,794 people enrolled in the federal exchange—which amounts to 23 per state per day—and 79,391 enrolled in the state-based exchanges, for a total of 106,185.

In the market for individually-purchased health insurance, more than 4.8 million Americans have received notices that their preexisting plans are soon to be illegal, and will be cancelled. Many more cancellation notices are imminent.

The article talks about the new 29-hour work week, but falsely claims that this is limited to “several businesses and the State of Virginia.” The actual number of documented examples is much larger, and this information has been mentioned on the article’s talk page several times. But the Obama supporters at wikipedia prefer that the article contain lies about this instead of the truth. As a result, none of the following 15 examples are in the article:

1) The New York Times reported that Obamacare

“sharply penalizes full-time employment in favor of part-time employment.”

2) In response to the employer mandate of Obamacare, some restaurants have announced plans to switch some of their employees from full time to part time, including some franchises of Olive Garden, Red Lobster, Taco Bell, White Castle, and Fatburger.

3) Community College of Allegheny County switched 200 professors and 200 other employees from full time to part time in response to Obamacare. Clint Benjamin, an English professor at Community College of Allegheny County, said that this would reduce his own monthly pay by $600.

4) In response to the employer mandate of Obamacare, other colleges have announced plans to switch some of their employees from full time to part time, including Florida’s Palm Beach State College, Ohio’s Youngstown State University, and New Jersey’s Kean University.

5) The Carnegie Museum of Pittsburgh reduced the hours of 48 of its employees in response to Obamacare.

6) Regal Entertainment Group, the largest chain of movie theaters in the country, announced that it would be switching thousands of its employees from full time to part time in response to the Obamacare mandate.

7) Utah’s Granite School District reduced the hours of 1,200 of its employees in response to Obamacare.

8) In response to Obamacare, many Wal-Mart stores have stopped hiring full time workers.

9) In July 2013, leaders of the Teamsters, UFCW, and UNITE-HERE sent a letter to Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi which said that Obamacare will

“destroy the foundation of the 40 hour work week that is the backbone of the American middle class… the law creates an incentive for employers to keep employees’ work hours below 30 hours a week. Numerous employers have begun to cut workers’ hours to avoid this obligation.”

10) In response to Obamacare, Forever 21 reduced its employees’ hours.

11) As of September 2013, more than 200 public-sector employers had reduced their employees’ hours in response to Obamacare.

12) Sea World reduced the weekly hours of its part time employees from 32 to 28 in response to Obamacare.

13) Lands’ End limited its part time employees to 29 hours per week in response to Obamacare.

14) As of September 2013, at least 34 universities and colleges had reduced some of their employees’ hours in response to Obamacare.

15) On October 23, 2013, Investor’s Business Daily wrote:

IBD has a running list that now includes 351 employers that have opted to cut work hours below 30 per week or take related steps to limit liability under ObamaCare’s employer mandate. Each entry is documented with links to news sources and public records.

About 275 entries on IBD’s list come from the public sector, including more than 100 school districts.

All of these things, with reliable sources, have been mentioned on the article’s talk page several times. But the Obama supporters almost always erase those comments, and ban the editors who suggested them.

It is not an accident, or a mistake, or an error, that Wikipedia’s Obamacare article contains false information. Instead, the Obama supporters at wikipedia are deliberately and knowingly including false information in the article.

Shame on them.

Advertisements

November 30, 2013. Tags: , , , , . Health care, Media bias, Politics, Wikipedia.

9 Comments

  1. Joseph Each replied:

    Dan – what is your twitter handle?

    Best Regards, Joseph R. Each

    >

    • danfromsquirrelhill replied:

      I don’t have one.

      • Joseph replied:

        You can reach many new readers by setting up an account. Many of us who enjoy your blog can easily share your writings on twitter. My advice is to sign up.

      • danfromsquirrelhill replied:

        I’m happy when others post links to my blog at Twitter. I don’t really want my own Twitter account – I often have trouble limiting myself to such short messages!

  2. Schlongy von Tiddlywinks-Husqvarna replied:

    Of course. Wikipedia is full of libtards who will never ever ever ever ever acknowledge the direct and laser-straight-line cause and effect between this heinous piece of legislative garbage and the destructive intended effects on all of our lives. They see it, allright. They just fail to generate the moral compass to actually give a ratsass about anyone but themselves and their godless marxist little ’causes’.

    But don’t post it on Fakebook, either. Or you will get shut down by a 22 year old punk-ass webtroll as some kind of ‘insane person’. (‘insane person’ = person who tells the truth and appears insane to others who truly are insane). As we all know, ‘liberals’ strongly believe in free speech – as long as it freely espouses the redistribution schemes and other ploys they worship as a modern day godless religion.

  3. vitale38 replied:

    Who owns and controls Wikipedia?

    • danfromsquirrelhill replied:

      As far as who owns wikipedia:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia%3AFAQ/Overview

      “Who owns the Web site? Wikipedia’s tech framework is supported by a non-profit parent organization, the Wikimedia Foundation, which also supports Wikipedia’s sister projects, including Wiktionary (a wiki dictionary), Wikibooks (textbooks), and others, and owns all of their domain names. Previously, the site was hosted on the servers of Bomis, Inc., a company mostly owned by Jimmy Wales. With the announcement of the Wikimedia Foundation on June 20, 2003, the ownership of all domain names was transferred to the Foundation.”

      “Who owns the encyclopedia articles? The articles hosted on this site have been edited by many people, each of whom has (by editing the article) agreed to release their contributions under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license. As such, the articles are free content and may be reproduced freely under this license. See Wikipedia:Copyrights and Wikipedia:Readers’ FAQ for information on how you can use Wikipedia content.”

      As far as who controls wikipedia, it’s supposed to operate based on consensus. One of the rules states:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view

      “Editing from a neutral point of view (NPOV) means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without bias, all of the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic. All Wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view. NPOV is a fundamental principle of Wikipedia and of other Wikimedia projects. This policy is nonnegotiable and all editors and articles must follow it.”

      This means that wikipedia is supposed to include the truth.

      The Obamacsre article is in violation of wikipedia policy.

  4. Honey Robin replied:

    Great stuff. Keep up the good work. Wikipedia is a not for profit approved directly by Lois Lerner IRS scandalous lady.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback URI

%d bloggers like this: